Does density-dependent diversification mirror ecological competitive exclusion?

Density-dependence is a term used in ecology to describe processes such as birth and death rates that are regulated by the number of individuals in a population. Evolutionary biologists have borrowed the term to describe decreasing rates of species accumulation, suggesting that speciation and extinc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melanie J Monroe, Folmer Bokma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5638247?pdf=render
id doaj-71b065c182654c74905ffb16a759a39a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71b065c182654c74905ffb16a759a39a2020-11-25T02:48:24ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011210e018481410.1371/journal.pone.0184814Does density-dependent diversification mirror ecological competitive exclusion?Melanie J MonroeFolmer BokmaDensity-dependence is a term used in ecology to describe processes such as birth and death rates that are regulated by the number of individuals in a population. Evolutionary biologists have borrowed the term to describe decreasing rates of species accumulation, suggesting that speciation and extinction rates depend on the total number of species in a clade. If this analogy with ecological density-dependence holds, diversification of clades is restricted because species compete for limited resources. We hypothesize that such competition should not only affect numbers of species, but also prevent species from being phenotypically similar. Here, we present a method to detect whether competitive interactions between species have ordered phenotypic traits on a phylogeny, assuming that competition prevents related species from having identical trait values. We use the method to analyze clades of birds and mammals, with body size as the phenotypic trait. We find no sign that competition has prevented species from having the same body size. Thus, since body size is a key ecological trait and competition does not seem to be responsible for differences in body size between species, we conclude that the diversification slowdown that is prevalent in these clades is unlikely due to the ecological interference implied by the term density dependence.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5638247?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Melanie J Monroe
Folmer Bokma
spellingShingle Melanie J Monroe
Folmer Bokma
Does density-dependent diversification mirror ecological competitive exclusion?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Melanie J Monroe
Folmer Bokma
author_sort Melanie J Monroe
title Does density-dependent diversification mirror ecological competitive exclusion?
title_short Does density-dependent diversification mirror ecological competitive exclusion?
title_full Does density-dependent diversification mirror ecological competitive exclusion?
title_fullStr Does density-dependent diversification mirror ecological competitive exclusion?
title_full_unstemmed Does density-dependent diversification mirror ecological competitive exclusion?
title_sort does density-dependent diversification mirror ecological competitive exclusion?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Density-dependence is a term used in ecology to describe processes such as birth and death rates that are regulated by the number of individuals in a population. Evolutionary biologists have borrowed the term to describe decreasing rates of species accumulation, suggesting that speciation and extinction rates depend on the total number of species in a clade. If this analogy with ecological density-dependence holds, diversification of clades is restricted because species compete for limited resources. We hypothesize that such competition should not only affect numbers of species, but also prevent species from being phenotypically similar. Here, we present a method to detect whether competitive interactions between species have ordered phenotypic traits on a phylogeny, assuming that competition prevents related species from having identical trait values. We use the method to analyze clades of birds and mammals, with body size as the phenotypic trait. We find no sign that competition has prevented species from having the same body size. Thus, since body size is a key ecological trait and competition does not seem to be responsible for differences in body size between species, we conclude that the diversification slowdown that is prevalent in these clades is unlikely due to the ecological interference implied by the term density dependence.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5638247?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT melaniejmonroe doesdensitydependentdiversificationmirrorecologicalcompetitiveexclusion
AT folmerbokma doesdensitydependentdiversificationmirrorecologicalcompetitiveexclusion
_version_ 1724748110867988480