Effects of Emotional Response on Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication and Blood Pressure Improvement

Background. Developing interventions to improve medication adherence may depend upon discovery of novel behavioral risk factors for nonadherence. Objective. Explore the effects of emotional response (ER) on adherence to antihypertensive medication and on systolic blood pressure (SBP) improvement. De...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert D. Keeley, Margaret Driscoll
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2013-01-01
Series:International Journal of Hypertension
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/358562
id doaj-7481732dc05c4d73aaae9a443310e605
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7481732dc05c4d73aaae9a443310e6052020-11-25T00:38:24ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Hypertension2090-03842090-03922013-01-01201310.1155/2013/358562358562Effects of Emotional Response on Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication and Blood Pressure ImprovementRobert D. Keeley0Margaret Driscoll1Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USADriscoll Consulting, Boulder, CO 80303, USABackground. Developing interventions to improve medication adherence may depend upon discovery of novel behavioral risk factors for nonadherence. Objective. Explore the effects of emotional response (ER) on adherence to antihypertensive medication and on systolic blood pressure (SBP) improvement. Design. We studied 101 adults with diabetes and hypertension. The primary outcome, 90-day “percentage of days covered” adherence score, was determined from pharmacy refill records. The secondary outcome was change in SBP over 90 days. ER was classified as positive, negative, or neutral. Results. Average adherence was 71.6% (SD 31.4%), and negative and positive ER were endorsed by 25% and 9% of subjects, respectively. Gender moderated the effect of positive or negative versus neutral ER on adherence (interaction P=0.003); regardless of gender, negative and positive ER were associated with similarly high and low adherence, respectively, but males endorsing neutral ER had significantly higher adherence than their female counterparts (85.6% versus 57.1%, F value = 15.3, P=0.0002). Adherence mediated ER's effect on SBP improvement: among participants with negative, but not positive or neutral, ER, increasing adherence and SBP improvement were correlated (Spearman’s r=0.49, P=0.02). Conclusions. Negative, but not positive or neutral, ER predicted better medication adherence and a correlation between medication adherence and improvement in SBP.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/358562
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert D. Keeley
Margaret Driscoll
spellingShingle Robert D. Keeley
Margaret Driscoll
Effects of Emotional Response on Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication and Blood Pressure Improvement
International Journal of Hypertension
author_facet Robert D. Keeley
Margaret Driscoll
author_sort Robert D. Keeley
title Effects of Emotional Response on Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication and Blood Pressure Improvement
title_short Effects of Emotional Response on Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication and Blood Pressure Improvement
title_full Effects of Emotional Response on Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication and Blood Pressure Improvement
title_fullStr Effects of Emotional Response on Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication and Blood Pressure Improvement
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Emotional Response on Adherence to Antihypertensive Medication and Blood Pressure Improvement
title_sort effects of emotional response on adherence to antihypertensive medication and blood pressure improvement
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Hypertension
issn 2090-0384
2090-0392
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Background. Developing interventions to improve medication adherence may depend upon discovery of novel behavioral risk factors for nonadherence. Objective. Explore the effects of emotional response (ER) on adherence to antihypertensive medication and on systolic blood pressure (SBP) improvement. Design. We studied 101 adults with diabetes and hypertension. The primary outcome, 90-day “percentage of days covered” adherence score, was determined from pharmacy refill records. The secondary outcome was change in SBP over 90 days. ER was classified as positive, negative, or neutral. Results. Average adherence was 71.6% (SD 31.4%), and negative and positive ER were endorsed by 25% and 9% of subjects, respectively. Gender moderated the effect of positive or negative versus neutral ER on adherence (interaction P=0.003); regardless of gender, negative and positive ER were associated with similarly high and low adherence, respectively, but males endorsing neutral ER had significantly higher adherence than their female counterparts (85.6% versus 57.1%, F value = 15.3, P=0.0002). Adherence mediated ER's effect on SBP improvement: among participants with negative, but not positive or neutral, ER, increasing adherence and SBP improvement were correlated (Spearman’s r=0.49, P=0.02). Conclusions. Negative, but not positive or neutral, ER predicted better medication adherence and a correlation between medication adherence and improvement in SBP.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/358562
work_keys_str_mv AT robertdkeeley effectsofemotionalresponseonadherencetoantihypertensivemedicationandbloodpressureimprovement
AT margaretdriscoll effectsofemotionalresponseonadherencetoantihypertensivemedicationandbloodpressureimprovement
_version_ 1725297583496101888