Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face

INTRODUCTION: The literature has demonstrated that alterations in craniofacial morphology characterizing individuals with cleft palate are observed in both operated and unoperated patients. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face, based on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho, Larissa Alves de Albuquerque Rosa, Rita de Cássia M. Carvalho Lauris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of São Paulo 2007-06-01
Series:Journal of Applied Oral Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000300009
id doaj-7704f5fb8c7041b687c1e3e03a9bd2b6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7704f5fb8c7041b687c1e3e03a9bd2b62020-11-25T00:41:09ZengUniversity of São PauloJournal of Applied Oral Science1678-77571678-77652007-06-0115319920810.1590/S1678-77572007000300009Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the faceOmar Gabriel da Silva FilhoLarissa Alves de Albuquerque RosaRita de Cássia M. Carvalho LaurisINTRODUCTION: The literature has demonstrated that alterations in craniofacial morphology characterizing individuals with cleft palate are observed in both operated and unoperated patients. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face, based on facial analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral facial photographs of the right side of 85 young adult patients with cleft palate were analyzed, of whom 50 were operated on and 35 had never received any previous surgical treatment. The nasolabial angle and zygomatic projection were used to define the maxillary position in the face. Mandibular positioning was classified as Pattern I, II and III. RESULTS: Patients were distributed into 54.12% as Pattern I, 32.94% Pattern II and 12.94% Pattern III. Distribution of facial patterns did not show statistically significant differences between groups (p>0.05). Although palatoplasty did not influence the facial pattern, the zygomatic projection was vulnerable to plastic surgeries. Twenty-eight percent of the patients in the operated group showed zygomatic deficiency, compared to only 8.5% in the unoperated group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isolated cleft palate, palatoplasty may influence negatively the sagittal behavior of the maxilla, according to the zygomatic projection of the face, though without compromising the facial pattern.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000300009Cleft lipCleft palateSurgeryFace
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho
Larissa Alves de Albuquerque Rosa
Rita de Cássia M. Carvalho Lauris
spellingShingle Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho
Larissa Alves de Albuquerque Rosa
Rita de Cássia M. Carvalho Lauris
Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face
Journal of Applied Oral Science
Cleft lip
Cleft palate
Surgery
Face
author_facet Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho
Larissa Alves de Albuquerque Rosa
Rita de Cássia M. Carvalho Lauris
author_sort Omar Gabriel da Silva Filho
title Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face
title_short Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face
title_full Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face
title_fullStr Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face
title_full_unstemmed Influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face
title_sort influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face
publisher University of São Paulo
series Journal of Applied Oral Science
issn 1678-7757
1678-7765
publishDate 2007-06-01
description INTRODUCTION: The literature has demonstrated that alterations in craniofacial morphology characterizing individuals with cleft palate are observed in both operated and unoperated patients. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the influence of isolated cleft palate and palatoplasty on the face, based on facial analysis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Lateral facial photographs of the right side of 85 young adult patients with cleft palate were analyzed, of whom 50 were operated on and 35 had never received any previous surgical treatment. The nasolabial angle and zygomatic projection were used to define the maxillary position in the face. Mandibular positioning was classified as Pattern I, II and III. RESULTS: Patients were distributed into 54.12% as Pattern I, 32.94% Pattern II and 12.94% Pattern III. Distribution of facial patterns did not show statistically significant differences between groups (p>0.05). Although palatoplasty did not influence the facial pattern, the zygomatic projection was vulnerable to plastic surgeries. Twenty-eight percent of the patients in the operated group showed zygomatic deficiency, compared to only 8.5% in the unoperated group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with isolated cleft palate, palatoplasty may influence negatively the sagittal behavior of the maxilla, according to the zygomatic projection of the face, though without compromising the facial pattern.
topic Cleft lip
Cleft palate
Surgery
Face
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000300009
work_keys_str_mv AT omargabrieldasilvafilho influenceofisolatedcleftpalateandpalatoplastyontheface
AT larissaalvesdealbuquerquerosa influenceofisolatedcleftpalateandpalatoplastyontheface
AT ritadecassiamcarvalholauris influenceofisolatedcleftpalateandpalatoplastyontheface
_version_ 1725287034028818432