Ethical issues on artificial intelligence in radiology: how is it reported in research articles? The current state and future directions

Background. This paper evaluates the status of reporting information related to the usage and ethical issues of artificial intelligence (AI) procedures in clinical trial (CT) papers focussed on radiology issues as well as other (non-trial) original radiology articles (OA). Material and Methods. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tomasz Piotrowski, Joanna Kazmierska, Mirosława Mocydlarz-Adamcewicz, Adam Ryczkowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Poznan University of Medical Sciences 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Medical Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jms.ump.edu.pl/index.php/JMS/article/view/513
id doaj-7881f169dd63458387838e88df2562e3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7881f169dd63458387838e88df2562e32021-08-08T08:23:53ZengPoznan University of Medical SciencesJournal of Medical Science2353-97982353-98012021-06-0190210.20883/medical.e513416Ethical issues on artificial intelligence in radiology: how is it reported in research articles? The current state and future directionsTomasz Piotrowski0Joanna Kazmierska1Mirosława Mocydlarz-Adamcewicz2Adam Ryczkowski3Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, PolandDepartment of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland; Radiotherapy Department II, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, PolandDepartment of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland; IT Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, PolandDepartment of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland; Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland Background. This paper evaluates the status of reporting information related to the usage and ethical issues of artificial intelligence (AI) procedures in clinical trial (CT) papers focussed on radiology issues as well as other (non-trial) original radiology articles (OA). Material and Methods. The evaluation was performed by three independent observers who were, respectively physicist, physician and computer scientist. The analysis was performed for two groups of publications, i.e., for CT and OA. Each group included 30 papers published from 2018 to 2020, published before guidelines proposed by Liu et al. (Nat Med. 2020; 26:1364-1374). The set of items used to catalogue and to verify the ethical status of the AI reporting was developed using the above-mentioned guidelines. Results. Most of the reviewed studies, clearly stated their use of AI methods and more importantly, almost all tried to address relevant clinical questions. Although in most of the studies, patient inclusion and exclusion criteria were presented, the widespread lack of rigorous descriptions of the study design apart from a detailed explanation of the AI approach itself is noticeable. Few of the chosen studies provided information about anonymization of data and the process of secure data sharing. Only a few studies explore the patterns of incorrect predictions by the proposed AI tools and their possible reasons. Conclusion. Results of review support idea of implementation of uniform guidelines for designing and reporting studies with use of AI tools. Such guidelines help to design robust, transparent and reproducible tools for use in real life. https://jms.ump.edu.pl/index.php/JMS/article/view/513EthicsRadiologyArtificial IntelligenceDiagnosticsMedical Imaging
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tomasz Piotrowski
Joanna Kazmierska
Mirosława Mocydlarz-Adamcewicz
Adam Ryczkowski
spellingShingle Tomasz Piotrowski
Joanna Kazmierska
Mirosława Mocydlarz-Adamcewicz
Adam Ryczkowski
Ethical issues on artificial intelligence in radiology: how is it reported in research articles? The current state and future directions
Journal of Medical Science
Ethics
Radiology
Artificial Intelligence
Diagnostics
Medical Imaging
author_facet Tomasz Piotrowski
Joanna Kazmierska
Mirosława Mocydlarz-Adamcewicz
Adam Ryczkowski
author_sort Tomasz Piotrowski
title Ethical issues on artificial intelligence in radiology: how is it reported in research articles? The current state and future directions
title_short Ethical issues on artificial intelligence in radiology: how is it reported in research articles? The current state and future directions
title_full Ethical issues on artificial intelligence in radiology: how is it reported in research articles? The current state and future directions
title_fullStr Ethical issues on artificial intelligence in radiology: how is it reported in research articles? The current state and future directions
title_full_unstemmed Ethical issues on artificial intelligence in radiology: how is it reported in research articles? The current state and future directions
title_sort ethical issues on artificial intelligence in radiology: how is it reported in research articles? the current state and future directions
publisher Poznan University of Medical Sciences
series Journal of Medical Science
issn 2353-9798
2353-9801
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Background. This paper evaluates the status of reporting information related to the usage and ethical issues of artificial intelligence (AI) procedures in clinical trial (CT) papers focussed on radiology issues as well as other (non-trial) original radiology articles (OA). Material and Methods. The evaluation was performed by three independent observers who were, respectively physicist, physician and computer scientist. The analysis was performed for two groups of publications, i.e., for CT and OA. Each group included 30 papers published from 2018 to 2020, published before guidelines proposed by Liu et al. (Nat Med. 2020; 26:1364-1374). The set of items used to catalogue and to verify the ethical status of the AI reporting was developed using the above-mentioned guidelines. Results. Most of the reviewed studies, clearly stated their use of AI methods and more importantly, almost all tried to address relevant clinical questions. Although in most of the studies, patient inclusion and exclusion criteria were presented, the widespread lack of rigorous descriptions of the study design apart from a detailed explanation of the AI approach itself is noticeable. Few of the chosen studies provided information about anonymization of data and the process of secure data sharing. Only a few studies explore the patterns of incorrect predictions by the proposed AI tools and their possible reasons. Conclusion. Results of review support idea of implementation of uniform guidelines for designing and reporting studies with use of AI tools. Such guidelines help to design robust, transparent and reproducible tools for use in real life.
topic Ethics
Radiology
Artificial Intelligence
Diagnostics
Medical Imaging
url https://jms.ump.edu.pl/index.php/JMS/article/view/513
work_keys_str_mv AT tomaszpiotrowski ethicalissuesonartificialintelligenceinradiologyhowisitreportedinresearcharticlesthecurrentstateandfuturedirections
AT joannakazmierska ethicalissuesonartificialintelligenceinradiologyhowisitreportedinresearcharticlesthecurrentstateandfuturedirections
AT mirosławamocydlarzadamcewicz ethicalissuesonartificialintelligenceinradiologyhowisitreportedinresearcharticlesthecurrentstateandfuturedirections
AT adamryczkowski ethicalissuesonartificialintelligenceinradiologyhowisitreportedinresearcharticlesthecurrentstateandfuturedirections
_version_ 1721216282491092992