Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint
At normal conditions, one of the most important knee stabilizers is the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL). Seven pig knees were subjected to a 700 N compressive load at three different flexion angles (70°, 55° and 40°) using a universal testing machine MTS Bionix 515.11. Contact pressure, contact...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad Industrial de Santander
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Revista UIS Ingenierías |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistauisingenierias/article/view/8158 |
id |
doaj-7b536b685d2d448ea96568df7c0471e5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7b536b685d2d448ea96568df7c0471e52020-11-25T02:21:54ZengUniversidad Industrial de SantanderRevista UIS Ingenierías1657-45832145-84562018-06-0117210.18273/revuin.v17n2-2018024Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee jointDaniel Chaparro0Cesar Herrera1Diego Fernando Villegas Bermudez2Universidad Industrial de SantanderInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyUniversidad Industrial de Santander At normal conditions, one of the most important knee stabilizers is the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL). Seven pig knees were subjected to a 700 N compressive load at three different flexion angles (70°, 55° and 40°) using a universal testing machine MTS Bionix 515.11. Contact pressure, contact area and peak force were obtained for healthy knees and ACL hyper-extension injury was induced to the knee by a load in the posterior side of the tibia with the knee at full extension until the ligament failed. The obtained results showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) for the contact pressure for the highest angle evaluated vs all the other angles in an injured knee. To the contact area with some little differences. Lastly, for the peak force statistically significant differences were found in almost all the conditions denoting the importance of the ACL as a primary stabilizer. The present study sought to determine the contact mechanics on healthy and ACL ruptured knees. https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistauisingenierias/article/view/8158ACLtibiofemoral contact propertiesknee jointosteoarthritispressure sensor |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Daniel Chaparro Cesar Herrera Diego Fernando Villegas Bermudez |
spellingShingle |
Daniel Chaparro Cesar Herrera Diego Fernando Villegas Bermudez Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint Revista UIS Ingenierías ACL tibiofemoral contact properties knee joint osteoarthritis pressure sensor |
author_facet |
Daniel Chaparro Cesar Herrera Diego Fernando Villegas Bermudez |
author_sort |
Daniel Chaparro |
title |
Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint |
title_short |
Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint |
title_full |
Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint |
title_fullStr |
Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint |
title_sort |
tibiofemoral contact properties for different flexion angles on injured acl knee joint |
publisher |
Universidad Industrial de Santander |
series |
Revista UIS Ingenierías |
issn |
1657-4583 2145-8456 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
At normal conditions, one of the most important knee stabilizers is the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL). Seven pig knees were subjected to a 700 N compressive load at three different flexion angles (70°, 55° and 40°) using a universal testing machine MTS Bionix 515.11. Contact pressure, contact area and peak force were obtained for healthy knees and ACL hyper-extension injury was induced to the knee by a load in the posterior side of the tibia with the knee at full extension until the ligament failed. The obtained results showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) for the contact pressure for the highest angle evaluated vs all the other angles in an injured knee. To the contact area with some little differences. Lastly, for the peak force statistically significant differences were found in almost all the conditions denoting the importance of the ACL as a primary stabilizer. The present study sought to determine the contact mechanics on healthy and ACL ruptured knees.
|
topic |
ACL tibiofemoral contact properties knee joint osteoarthritis pressure sensor |
url |
https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistauisingenierias/article/view/8158 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT danielchaparro tibiofemoralcontactpropertiesfordifferentflexionanglesoninjuredaclkneejoint AT cesarherrera tibiofemoralcontactpropertiesfordifferentflexionanglesoninjuredaclkneejoint AT diegofernandovillegasbermudez tibiofemoralcontactpropertiesfordifferentflexionanglesoninjuredaclkneejoint |
_version_ |
1724864732589981696 |