Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint

At normal conditions, one of the most important knee stabilizers is the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL).  Seven pig knees were subjected to a 700 N compressive load at three different flexion angles (70°, 55° and 40°) using a universal testing machine MTS Bionix 515.11.  Contact pressure, contact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Chaparro, Cesar Herrera, Diego Fernando Villegas Bermudez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Industrial de Santander 2018-06-01
Series:Revista UIS Ingenierías
Subjects:
ACL
Online Access:https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistauisingenierias/article/view/8158
id doaj-7b536b685d2d448ea96568df7c0471e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7b536b685d2d448ea96568df7c0471e52020-11-25T02:21:54ZengUniversidad Industrial de SantanderRevista UIS Ingenierías1657-45832145-84562018-06-0117210.18273/revuin.v17n2-2018024Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee jointDaniel Chaparro0Cesar Herrera1Diego Fernando Villegas Bermudez2Universidad Industrial de SantanderInstituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de MonterreyUniversidad Industrial de Santander At normal conditions, one of the most important knee stabilizers is the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL).  Seven pig knees were subjected to a 700 N compressive load at three different flexion angles (70°, 55° and 40°) using a universal testing machine MTS Bionix 515.11.  Contact pressure, contact area and peak force were obtained for healthy knees and ACL hyper-extension injury was induced to the knee by a load in the posterior side of the tibia with the knee at full extension until the ligament failed.  The obtained results showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) for the contact pressure for the highest angle evaluated vs all the other angles in an injured knee.  To the contact area with some little differences.  Lastly, for the peak force statistically significant differences were found in almost all the conditions denoting the importance of the ACL as a primary stabilizer. The present study sought to determine the contact mechanics on healthy and ACL ruptured knees. https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistauisingenierias/article/view/8158ACLtibiofemoral contact propertiesknee jointosteoarthritispressure sensor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Chaparro
Cesar Herrera
Diego Fernando Villegas Bermudez
spellingShingle Daniel Chaparro
Cesar Herrera
Diego Fernando Villegas Bermudez
Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint
Revista UIS Ingenierías
ACL
tibiofemoral contact properties
knee joint
osteoarthritis
pressure sensor
author_facet Daniel Chaparro
Cesar Herrera
Diego Fernando Villegas Bermudez
author_sort Daniel Chaparro
title Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint
title_short Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint
title_full Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint
title_fullStr Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint
title_full_unstemmed Tibiofemoral Contact Properties for different flexion angles on injured ACL knee joint
title_sort tibiofemoral contact properties for different flexion angles on injured acl knee joint
publisher Universidad Industrial de Santander
series Revista UIS Ingenierías
issn 1657-4583
2145-8456
publishDate 2018-06-01
description At normal conditions, one of the most important knee stabilizers is the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL).  Seven pig knees were subjected to a 700 N compressive load at three different flexion angles (70°, 55° and 40°) using a universal testing machine MTS Bionix 515.11.  Contact pressure, contact area and peak force were obtained for healthy knees and ACL hyper-extension injury was induced to the knee by a load in the posterior side of the tibia with the knee at full extension until the ligament failed.  The obtained results showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05) for the contact pressure for the highest angle evaluated vs all the other angles in an injured knee.  To the contact area with some little differences.  Lastly, for the peak force statistically significant differences were found in almost all the conditions denoting the importance of the ACL as a primary stabilizer. The present study sought to determine the contact mechanics on healthy and ACL ruptured knees.
topic ACL
tibiofemoral contact properties
knee joint
osteoarthritis
pressure sensor
url https://revistas.uis.edu.co/index.php/revistauisingenierias/article/view/8158
work_keys_str_mv AT danielchaparro tibiofemoralcontactpropertiesfordifferentflexionanglesoninjuredaclkneejoint
AT cesarherrera tibiofemoralcontactpropertiesfordifferentflexionanglesoninjuredaclkneejoint
AT diegofernandovillegasbermudez tibiofemoralcontactpropertiesfordifferentflexionanglesoninjuredaclkneejoint
_version_ 1724864732589981696