Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparative genome mapping studies in Rosaceae have been conducted until now by aligning genetic maps within the same genus, or closely related genera and using a limited number of common markers. The growing body of genomics resourc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Velasco Riccardo, Gardiner Susan, Iezzoni Amy, van der Knaap Esther, Cabrera Antonio, Pindo Massimo, Crowhurst Ross, Cestaro Alessandro, Bushakra Jill, Girona Elena, Sargent Daniel J, Illa Eudald, Arús Pere, Chagné David, Troggio Michela
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-01-01
Series:BMC Evolutionary Biology
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/9
id doaj-7f251830ed3d47f88ea7fd1c699cfbca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7f251830ed3d47f88ea7fd1c699cfbca2021-09-02T07:39:58ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482011-01-01111910.1186/1471-2148-11-9Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the familyVelasco RiccardoGardiner SusanIezzoni Amyvan der Knaap EstherCabrera AntonioPindo MassimoCrowhurst RossCestaro AlessandroBushakra JillGirona ElenaSargent Daniel JIlla EudaldArús PereChagné DavidTroggio Michela<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparative genome mapping studies in Rosaceae have been conducted until now by aligning genetic maps within the same genus, or closely related genera and using a limited number of common markers. The growing body of genomics resources and sequence data for both <it>Prunus </it>and <it>Fragaria </it>permits detailed comparisons between these genera and the recently released <it>Malus × domestica </it>genome sequence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We generated a comparative analysis using 806 molecular markers that are anchored genetically to the <it>Prunus </it>and/or <it>Fragaria </it>reference maps, and physically to the <it>Malus </it>genome sequence. Markers in common for <it>Malus </it>and <it>Prunus</it>, and <it>Malus </it>and <it>Fragaria</it>, respectively were 784 and 148. The correspondence between marker positions was high and conserved syntenic blocks were identified among the three genera in the Rosaceae. We reconstructed a proposed ancestral genome for the Rosaceae.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A genome containing nine chromosomes is the most likely candidate for the ancestral Rosaceae progenitor. The number of chromosomal translocations observed between the three genera investigated was low. However, the number of inversions identified among <it>Malus </it>and <it>Prunus </it>was much higher than any reported genome comparisons in plants, suggesting that small inversions have played an important role in the evolution of these two genera or of the Rosaceae.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Velasco Riccardo
Gardiner Susan
Iezzoni Amy
van der Knaap Esther
Cabrera Antonio
Pindo Massimo
Crowhurst Ross
Cestaro Alessandro
Bushakra Jill
Girona Elena
Sargent Daniel J
Illa Eudald
Arús Pere
Chagné David
Troggio Michela
spellingShingle Velasco Riccardo
Gardiner Susan
Iezzoni Amy
van der Knaap Esther
Cabrera Antonio
Pindo Massimo
Crowhurst Ross
Cestaro Alessandro
Bushakra Jill
Girona Elena
Sargent Daniel J
Illa Eudald
Arús Pere
Chagné David
Troggio Michela
Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family
BMC Evolutionary Biology
author_facet Velasco Riccardo
Gardiner Susan
Iezzoni Amy
van der Knaap Esther
Cabrera Antonio
Pindo Massimo
Crowhurst Ross
Cestaro Alessandro
Bushakra Jill
Girona Elena
Sargent Daniel J
Illa Eudald
Arús Pere
Chagné David
Troggio Michela
author_sort Velasco Riccardo
title Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family
title_short Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family
title_full Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family
title_sort comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family
publisher BMC
series BMC Evolutionary Biology
issn 1471-2148
publishDate 2011-01-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparative genome mapping studies in Rosaceae have been conducted until now by aligning genetic maps within the same genus, or closely related genera and using a limited number of common markers. The growing body of genomics resources and sequence data for both <it>Prunus </it>and <it>Fragaria </it>permits detailed comparisons between these genera and the recently released <it>Malus × domestica </it>genome sequence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We generated a comparative analysis using 806 molecular markers that are anchored genetically to the <it>Prunus </it>and/or <it>Fragaria </it>reference maps, and physically to the <it>Malus </it>genome sequence. Markers in common for <it>Malus </it>and <it>Prunus</it>, and <it>Malus </it>and <it>Fragaria</it>, respectively were 784 and 148. The correspondence between marker positions was high and conserved syntenic blocks were identified among the three genera in the Rosaceae. We reconstructed a proposed ancestral genome for the Rosaceae.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A genome containing nine chromosomes is the most likely candidate for the ancestral Rosaceae progenitor. The number of chromosomal translocations observed between the three genera investigated was low. However, the number of inversions identified among <it>Malus </it>and <it>Prunus </it>was much higher than any reported genome comparisons in plants, suggesting that small inversions have played an important role in the evolution of these two genera or of the Rosaceae.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/9
work_keys_str_mv AT velascoriccardo comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT gardinersusan comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT iezzoniamy comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT vanderknaapesther comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT cabreraantonio comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT pindomassimo comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT crowhurstross comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT cestaroalessandro comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT bushakrajill comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT gironaelena comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT sargentdanielj comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT illaeudald comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT aruspere comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT chagnedavid comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
AT troggiomichela comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily
_version_ 1721178309196251136