Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparative genome mapping studies in Rosaceae have been conducted until now by aligning genetic maps within the same genus, or closely related genera and using a limited number of common markers. The growing body of genomics resourc...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2011-01-01
|
Series: | BMC Evolutionary Biology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/9 |
id |
doaj-7f251830ed3d47f88ea7fd1c699cfbca |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7f251830ed3d47f88ea7fd1c699cfbca2021-09-02T07:39:58ZengBMCBMC Evolutionary Biology1471-21482011-01-01111910.1186/1471-2148-11-9Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the familyVelasco RiccardoGardiner SusanIezzoni Amyvan der Knaap EstherCabrera AntonioPindo MassimoCrowhurst RossCestaro AlessandroBushakra JillGirona ElenaSargent Daniel JIlla EudaldArús PereChagné DavidTroggio Michela<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparative genome mapping studies in Rosaceae have been conducted until now by aligning genetic maps within the same genus, or closely related genera and using a limited number of common markers. The growing body of genomics resources and sequence data for both <it>Prunus </it>and <it>Fragaria </it>permits detailed comparisons between these genera and the recently released <it>Malus × domestica </it>genome sequence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We generated a comparative analysis using 806 molecular markers that are anchored genetically to the <it>Prunus </it>and/or <it>Fragaria </it>reference maps, and physically to the <it>Malus </it>genome sequence. Markers in common for <it>Malus </it>and <it>Prunus</it>, and <it>Malus </it>and <it>Fragaria</it>, respectively were 784 and 148. The correspondence between marker positions was high and conserved syntenic blocks were identified among the three genera in the Rosaceae. We reconstructed a proposed ancestral genome for the Rosaceae.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A genome containing nine chromosomes is the most likely candidate for the ancestral Rosaceae progenitor. The number of chromosomal translocations observed between the three genera investigated was low. However, the number of inversions identified among <it>Malus </it>and <it>Prunus </it>was much higher than any reported genome comparisons in plants, suggesting that small inversions have played an important role in the evolution of these two genera or of the Rosaceae.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/9 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Velasco Riccardo Gardiner Susan Iezzoni Amy van der Knaap Esther Cabrera Antonio Pindo Massimo Crowhurst Ross Cestaro Alessandro Bushakra Jill Girona Elena Sargent Daniel J Illa Eudald Arús Pere Chagné David Troggio Michela |
spellingShingle |
Velasco Riccardo Gardiner Susan Iezzoni Amy van der Knaap Esther Cabrera Antonio Pindo Massimo Crowhurst Ross Cestaro Alessandro Bushakra Jill Girona Elena Sargent Daniel J Illa Eudald Arús Pere Chagné David Troggio Michela Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family BMC Evolutionary Biology |
author_facet |
Velasco Riccardo Gardiner Susan Iezzoni Amy van der Knaap Esther Cabrera Antonio Pindo Massimo Crowhurst Ross Cestaro Alessandro Bushakra Jill Girona Elena Sargent Daniel J Illa Eudald Arús Pere Chagné David Troggio Michela |
author_sort |
Velasco Riccardo |
title |
Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family |
title_sort |
comparative analysis of rosaceous genomes and the reconstruction of a putative ancestral genome for the family |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Evolutionary Biology |
issn |
1471-2148 |
publishDate |
2011-01-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Comparative genome mapping studies in Rosaceae have been conducted until now by aligning genetic maps within the same genus, or closely related genera and using a limited number of common markers. The growing body of genomics resources and sequence data for both <it>Prunus </it>and <it>Fragaria </it>permits detailed comparisons between these genera and the recently released <it>Malus × domestica </it>genome sequence.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We generated a comparative analysis using 806 molecular markers that are anchored genetically to the <it>Prunus </it>and/or <it>Fragaria </it>reference maps, and physically to the <it>Malus </it>genome sequence. Markers in common for <it>Malus </it>and <it>Prunus</it>, and <it>Malus </it>and <it>Fragaria</it>, respectively were 784 and 148. The correspondence between marker positions was high and conserved syntenic blocks were identified among the three genera in the Rosaceae. We reconstructed a proposed ancestral genome for the Rosaceae.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>A genome containing nine chromosomes is the most likely candidate for the ancestral Rosaceae progenitor. The number of chromosomal translocations observed between the three genera investigated was low. However, the number of inversions identified among <it>Malus </it>and <it>Prunus </it>was much higher than any reported genome comparisons in plants, suggesting that small inversions have played an important role in the evolution of these two genera or of the Rosaceae.</p> |
url |
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT velascoriccardo comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT gardinersusan comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT iezzoniamy comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT vanderknaapesther comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT cabreraantonio comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT pindomassimo comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT crowhurstross comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT cestaroalessandro comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT bushakrajill comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT gironaelena comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT sargentdanielj comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT illaeudald comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT aruspere comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT chagnedavid comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily AT troggiomichela comparativeanalysisofrosaceousgenomesandthereconstructionofaputativeancestralgenomeforthefamily |
_version_ |
1721178309196251136 |