Evaluating and improving the anti-crisis plans in Russia and worldwide under COVID-19 pandemics. Specific features of crisis management in the state

• Main Author: Dmitriy V. Manushin
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Tatar Educational Center "TAGLIMAT" Ltd. 2020-12-01
• Series: Aktualʹnye Problemy Èkonomiki i Prava
• Subjects: economic theory
• Online Access: http://apel.ieml.ru/storage/archive_articles/9995.pdf

Objective based on a critical assessment of the anticrisis plans of the Russian Federation and other states the positions of scientists and experts to propose measures to correct these plans to improve the quality of management of the Russian economy. To generalize the possibilities of applying the experience of neutralizing the crisis consequences in the framework of the views of existing economic schools. Methods the research uses such techniques of abstractlogical method as analysis synthesis generalization comparison analogy deduction induction and prediction. Results the author analyzes the anticrisis plan of Russia and reveals the shortcomings of the Russian national plan which ensures the restoration of employment and income of the population economic growth and longterm structural changes. The article summarizes foreign practices some of which are recommended to be implemented in the Russian economy. Recommendations for correction of the studied anticrisis plans are offered. Taking into account the identified shortcomings and some foreign practices the anticrisis plan of the Russian Federation is proposed to be adjusted in the fields of support for import substitution improvement of social support of the population development of exports modernization of national economy sectors improvement of taxation promotion of digitalization improvement of the quality of work of the Russian regions. The actions to be included in the M. V. Mishustinrsquos anticrisis plan are defined. It is revealed that the actions of the Russian Federation Government under the pandemic clearly show the priority of solving noneconomic problems over economic ones. This may indicate that crisis management is implemented within the framework of the traditional institutionalism paradigm. Scientific novelty first a new direction of economic theory development is proposed ndash anticrisis traditional institutionalism or management of economic crises from the viewpoint of traditional institutionalism. Second the relevance of the littleknown theory of infinite crises and infinite crisis management is confirmed. Third new measures are proposed for managing the Russian state in times of obvious and hidden crises. Many of them are of an organizational nature which fully corresponds with the priorities outlined above. Practical significance the proposed measures can be used to improve crisis management in the Russian economy. The development of economic theory according to the proposed scheme will lead to a change in the structure of objects and methods of anticrisis management which will clarify the methodology of anticrisis management of macroeconomy.