Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review

Objective: To review the psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) as a self-report measure of depression in a variety of settings and populations. Methods: Relevant studies of the BDI-II were retrieved through a search of electronic databases, a hand search, and contact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yuan-Pang Wang, Clarice Gorenstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP) 2013-12-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462013000400416&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-8351bbec604147e39168d291c3cfe76c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8351bbec604147e39168d291c3cfe76c2020-11-25T02:13:01ZengAssociação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry1809-452X2013-12-0135441643110.1590/1516-4446-2012-1048S1516-44462013000400416Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive reviewYuan-Pang WangClarice GorensteinObjective: To review the psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) as a self-report measure of depression in a variety of settings and populations. Methods: Relevant studies of the BDI-II were retrieved through a search of electronic databases, a hand search, and contact with authors. Retained studies (k = 118) were allocated into three groups: non-clinical, psychiatric/institutionalized, and medical samples. Results: The internal consistency was described as around 0.9 and the retest reliability ranged from 0.73 to 0.96. The correlation between BDI-II and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-I) was high and substantial overlap with measures of depression and anxiety was reported. The criterion-based validity showed good sensitivity and specificity for detecting depression in comparison to the adopted gold standard. However, the cutoff score to screen for depression varied according to the type of sample. Factor analysis showed a robust dimension of general depression composed by two constructs: cognitive-affective and somatic-vegetative. Conclusions: The BDI-II is a relevant psychometric instrument, showing high reliability, capacity to discriminate between depressed and non-depressed subjects, and improved concurrent, content, and structural validity. Based on available psychometric evidence, the BDI-II can be viewed as a cost-effective questionnaire for measuring the severity of depression, with broad applicability for research and clinical practice worldwide.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462013000400416&lng=en&tlng=enPsychometric scaledepressionreliabilityvalidityclassical testing theoryitem response theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yuan-Pang Wang
Clarice Gorenstein
spellingShingle Yuan-Pang Wang
Clarice Gorenstein
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review
Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
Psychometric scale
depression
reliability
validity
classical testing theory
item response theory
author_facet Yuan-Pang Wang
Clarice Gorenstein
author_sort Yuan-Pang Wang
title Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review
title_short Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review
title_full Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review
title_fullStr Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review
title_sort psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory-ii: a comprehensive review
publisher Associação Brasileira de Psiquiatria (ABP)
series Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry
issn 1809-452X
publishDate 2013-12-01
description Objective: To review the psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) as a self-report measure of depression in a variety of settings and populations. Methods: Relevant studies of the BDI-II were retrieved through a search of electronic databases, a hand search, and contact with authors. Retained studies (k = 118) were allocated into three groups: non-clinical, psychiatric/institutionalized, and medical samples. Results: The internal consistency was described as around 0.9 and the retest reliability ranged from 0.73 to 0.96. The correlation between BDI-II and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-I) was high and substantial overlap with measures of depression and anxiety was reported. The criterion-based validity showed good sensitivity and specificity for detecting depression in comparison to the adopted gold standard. However, the cutoff score to screen for depression varied according to the type of sample. Factor analysis showed a robust dimension of general depression composed by two constructs: cognitive-affective and somatic-vegetative. Conclusions: The BDI-II is a relevant psychometric instrument, showing high reliability, capacity to discriminate between depressed and non-depressed subjects, and improved concurrent, content, and structural validity. Based on available psychometric evidence, the BDI-II can be viewed as a cost-effective questionnaire for measuring the severity of depression, with broad applicability for research and clinical practice worldwide.
topic Psychometric scale
depression
reliability
validity
classical testing theory
item response theory
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-44462013000400416&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanpangwang psychometricpropertiesofthebeckdepressioninventoryiiacomprehensivereview
AT claricegorenstein psychometricpropertiesofthebeckdepressioninventoryiiacomprehensivereview
_version_ 1724906787244605440