Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust

Rational trust decisions depend on potential outcomes and expectations of reciprocity. In the trust game, outcomes and expectations correspond to the structural factors of risk and temptation. Two experiments investigated how risk and temptation influenced information search and final decisions in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anthony M. Evans, Joachim I. Krueger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Judgment and Decision Making 2014-03-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/13/13502/jdm13502.pdf
id doaj-8454112c14db4318936bea970cbdf65d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-8454112c14db4318936bea970cbdf65d2021-05-02T21:18:48ZengSociety for Judgment and Decision MakingJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752014-03-019290103Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trustAnthony M. EvansJoachim I. Krueger Rational trust decisions depend on potential outcomes and expectations of reciprocity. In the trust game, outcomes and expectations correspond to the structural factors of risk and temptation. Two experiments investigated how risk and temptation influenced information search and final decisions in the trust game. The central finding was that trustors underemphasized temptation relative to its effects on the expected value of trust. Instead, trustors made decisions egocentrically, focusing on potential outcomes. In Experiment 1, information search data revealed that trustors often made decisions without learning about the payoffs related to temptation. Experiment 2 investigated whether trustors were able to use temptation to form accurate expectations of reciprocity. Trustors understood, but underestimated, the relationship between temptation and the probability of reciprocity. Moreover, they did not fully consider expectations in their final trust decisions. Changes in potential outcomes had larger effects on trust than comparable changes in expectations. These results suggest that levels of trust are too high when the probability of reciprocity is low and too low when that probability is high. http://journal.sjdm.org/13/13502/jdm13502.pdftrust reciprocity social dilemmas egocentrism.NAKeywords
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anthony M. Evans
Joachim I. Krueger
spellingShingle Anthony M. Evans
Joachim I. Krueger
Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust
Judgment and Decision Making
trust
reciprocity
social dilemmas
egocentrism.NAKeywords
author_facet Anthony M. Evans
Joachim I. Krueger
author_sort Anthony M. Evans
title Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust
title_short Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust
title_full Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust
title_fullStr Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust
title_sort outcomes and expectations in dilemmas of trust
publisher Society for Judgment and Decision Making
series Judgment and Decision Making
issn 1930-2975
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Rational trust decisions depend on potential outcomes and expectations of reciprocity. In the trust game, outcomes and expectations correspond to the structural factors of risk and temptation. Two experiments investigated how risk and temptation influenced information search and final decisions in the trust game. The central finding was that trustors underemphasized temptation relative to its effects on the expected value of trust. Instead, trustors made decisions egocentrically, focusing on potential outcomes. In Experiment 1, information search data revealed that trustors often made decisions without learning about the payoffs related to temptation. Experiment 2 investigated whether trustors were able to use temptation to form accurate expectations of reciprocity. Trustors understood, but underestimated, the relationship between temptation and the probability of reciprocity. Moreover, they did not fully consider expectations in their final trust decisions. Changes in potential outcomes had larger effects on trust than comparable changes in expectations. These results suggest that levels of trust are too high when the probability of reciprocity is low and too low when that probability is high.
topic trust
reciprocity
social dilemmas
egocentrism.NAKeywords
url http://journal.sjdm.org/13/13502/jdm13502.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT anthonymevans outcomesandexpectationsindilemmasoftrust
AT joachimikrueger outcomesandexpectationsindilemmasoftrust
_version_ 1721487332621680640