COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MAIN SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT MODELS FOR INSURANCE FIELD

During the recent financial crisis of insurance domain, there were imposed new aspects that have to be taken into account concerning the risks management and surveillance activity. The insurance societies could develop internal models in order to determine the minimum capital requirement imposed by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniela Nicoleta SAHLIAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House 2015-07-01
Series:Challenges of the Knowledge Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2015_articles/index.php?dir=07_finance_and_accounting%2F&download=CKS+2015_finance_and_accounting_art.117.pdf
id doaj-88651ea0e0ee44b2a0d26a8d95140584
record_format Article
spelling doaj-88651ea0e0ee44b2a0d26a8d951405842020-11-24T21:02:14ZengNicolae Titulescu University Publishing HouseChallenges of the Knowledge Society2068-77962068-77962015-07-0151806811COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MAIN SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT MODELS FOR INSURANCE FIELDDaniela Nicoleta SAHLIAN0Postdoctoral Student, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Bucharest University of Economic Studies (e-mail: daniela.sahlian@gmail.com).During the recent financial crisis of insurance domain, there were imposed new aspects that have to be taken into account concerning the risks management and surveillance activity. The insurance societies could develop internal models in order to determine the minimum capital requirement imposed by the new regulations that are to be adopted on 1 January 2016. In this respect, the purpose of this research paper is to offer a real presentation and comparing with the main solvency regulation systems used worldwide, the accent being on their common characteristics and current tendencies. Thereby, we would like to offer a better understanding of the similarities and differences between the existent solvency regimes in order to develop the best regime of solvency for Romania within the Solvency II project. The study will show that there are clear differences between the existent Solvency I regime and the new approaches based on risk and will also point out the fact that even the key principles supporting the new solvency regimes are convergent, there are a lot of approaches for the application of these principles. In this context, the question we would try to find the answer is "how could the global solvency models be useful for the financial surveillance authority of Romania for the implementation of general model and for the development of internal solvency models according to the requirements of Solvency II" and "which would be the requirements for the implementation of this type of approach?". This thing makes the analysis of solvency models an interesting exercise.http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2015_articles/index.php?dir=07_finance_and_accounting%2F&download=CKS+2015_finance_and_accounting_art.117.pdfInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR)Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR)risk managementsolvency II.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniela Nicoleta SAHLIAN
spellingShingle Daniela Nicoleta SAHLIAN
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MAIN SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT MODELS FOR INSURANCE FIELD
Challenges of the Knowledge Society
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR)
Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR)
risk management
solvency II.
author_facet Daniela Nicoleta SAHLIAN
author_sort Daniela Nicoleta SAHLIAN
title COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MAIN SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT MODELS FOR INSURANCE FIELD
title_short COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MAIN SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT MODELS FOR INSURANCE FIELD
title_full COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MAIN SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT MODELS FOR INSURANCE FIELD
title_fullStr COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MAIN SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT MODELS FOR INSURANCE FIELD
title_full_unstemmed COMPARATIVE STUDY ON MAIN SOLVENCY ASSESSMENT MODELS FOR INSURANCE FIELD
title_sort comparative study on main solvency assessment models for insurance field
publisher Nicolae Titulescu University Publishing House
series Challenges of the Knowledge Society
issn 2068-7796
2068-7796
publishDate 2015-07-01
description During the recent financial crisis of insurance domain, there were imposed new aspects that have to be taken into account concerning the risks management and surveillance activity. The insurance societies could develop internal models in order to determine the minimum capital requirement imposed by the new regulations that are to be adopted on 1 January 2016. In this respect, the purpose of this research paper is to offer a real presentation and comparing with the main solvency regulation systems used worldwide, the accent being on their common characteristics and current tendencies. Thereby, we would like to offer a better understanding of the similarities and differences between the existent solvency regimes in order to develop the best regime of solvency for Romania within the Solvency II project. The study will show that there are clear differences between the existent Solvency I regime and the new approaches based on risk and will also point out the fact that even the key principles supporting the new solvency regimes are convergent, there are a lot of approaches for the application of these principles. In this context, the question we would try to find the answer is "how could the global solvency models be useful for the financial surveillance authority of Romania for the implementation of general model and for the development of internal solvency models according to the requirements of Solvency II" and "which would be the requirements for the implementation of this type of approach?". This thing makes the analysis of solvency models an interesting exercise.
topic International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR)
Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR)
risk management
solvency II.
url http://cks.univnt.ro/uploads/cks_2015_articles/index.php?dir=07_finance_and_accounting%2F&download=CKS+2015_finance_and_accounting_art.117.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT danielanicoletasahlian comparativestudyonmainsolvencyassessmentmodelsforinsurancefield
_version_ 1716776080432431104