Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?

Abstract Background Determine the exact slot dimension of a sample of a MBT prescription stainless steel conventional brackets from different manufacturers to compare the actual values with the nominal ones declared by the manufacturers and to verify the compliance with tolerance limits given by the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Bernés Martínez, Daniele Garcovich, Pilar España Pamplona, Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín, Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-07-01
Series:Head & Face Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00276-0
id doaj-887a633da3b541ce8b7c5851fe5325cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-887a633da3b541ce8b7c5851fe5325cc2021-07-11T11:13:14ZengBMCHead & Face Medicine1746-160X2021-07-0117111010.1186/s13005-021-00276-0Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?Laura Bernés Martínez0Daniele Garcovich1Pilar España Pamplona2Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín3Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo4Department of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de ValenciaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de ValenciaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de ValenciaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de ValenciaDepartment of Oral Surgery, Universidad de SalamancaAbstract Background Determine the exact slot dimension of a sample of a MBT prescription stainless steel conventional brackets from different manufacturers to compare the actual values with the nominal ones declared by the manufacturers and to verify the compliance with tolerance limits given by the ISO 27020:2019. Different batches from each manufacturer were evaluated to determine whether or not they are different in size. In addition, the geometry of the slot walls was assessed. Methods 360 stainless steel preadjusted orthodontic brackets of 12 different manufacturers were assessed. All brackets had a nominal slot size of 0.022 by 0.028 inches, belonged to the right upper central incisor, and were fabricated with the metal injection molding technique (MIM). For each manufacturer, three different manufacturing batches were evaluated. Brackets were coded using a single-blind design. Results All bracket systems in the study group except one displayed a statistically significant difference with the nominal declared value, although only four of the systems did not comply with the tolerance limits established by the ISO 27020:2019. In most of the systems, the slot height was oversized when compared to the nominal one. A significant interbatch variability was found in most of the evaluated systems. Most of the brackets walls were divergent. Conclusions The dimensional accuracy of commercially available metal brackets is not guaranteed. The respect for the norm should be enforced as well as the quality controls along the manufacturing process since orthodontic brackets are a precision medical device.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00276-0Orthodontic BracketsSlot parallelismSlot dimensionISO standardMachining accuracy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Bernés Martínez
Daniele Garcovich
Pilar España Pamplona
Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín
Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo
spellingShingle Laura Bernés Martínez
Daniele Garcovich
Pilar España Pamplona
Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín
Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo
Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?
Head & Face Medicine
Orthodontic Brackets
Slot parallelism
Slot dimension
ISO standard
Machining accuracy
author_facet Laura Bernés Martínez
Daniele Garcovich
Pilar España Pamplona
Milagros Adobes Adobes Martín
Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo
author_sort Laura Bernés Martínez
title Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?
title_short Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?
title_full Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?
title_fullStr Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?
title_full_unstemmed Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?
title_sort compliance with the iso 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted orthodontic bracket systems. are the actual dimensions as expected?
publisher BMC
series Head & Face Medicine
issn 1746-160X
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Background Determine the exact slot dimension of a sample of a MBT prescription stainless steel conventional brackets from different manufacturers to compare the actual values with the nominal ones declared by the manufacturers and to verify the compliance with tolerance limits given by the ISO 27020:2019. Different batches from each manufacturer were evaluated to determine whether or not they are different in size. In addition, the geometry of the slot walls was assessed. Methods 360 stainless steel preadjusted orthodontic brackets of 12 different manufacturers were assessed. All brackets had a nominal slot size of 0.022 by 0.028 inches, belonged to the right upper central incisor, and were fabricated with the metal injection molding technique (MIM). For each manufacturer, three different manufacturing batches were evaluated. Brackets were coded using a single-blind design. Results All bracket systems in the study group except one displayed a statistically significant difference with the nominal declared value, although only four of the systems did not comply with the tolerance limits established by the ISO 27020:2019. In most of the systems, the slot height was oversized when compared to the nominal one. A significant interbatch variability was found in most of the evaluated systems. Most of the brackets walls were divergent. Conclusions The dimensional accuracy of commercially available metal brackets is not guaranteed. The respect for the norm should be enforced as well as the quality controls along the manufacturing process since orthodontic brackets are a precision medical device.
topic Orthodontic Brackets
Slot parallelism
Slot dimension
ISO standard
Machining accuracy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-021-00276-0
work_keys_str_mv AT laurabernesmartinez compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected
AT danielegarcovich compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected
AT pilarespanapamplona compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected
AT milagrosadobesadobesmartin compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected
AT alfonsoalvaradolorenzo compliancewiththeiso270202019normofasampleofcurrentlyavailablepreadjustedorthodonticbracketsystemsaretheactualdimensionsasexpected
_version_ 1721309242601766912