Does uroflowmetry parameter facilitate discrimination between detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction?

Purpose: Though urodynamic study (UDS) is the current established standard to distinguish between detrusor underactivity (DU) and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), concerns of patient discomfort and potential complications of catheterization deters its use. We inspected clinical variables to discr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kwon Soo Lee, Phil Hyun Song, Young Hwii Ko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Urological Association 2016-11-01
Series:Investigative and Clinical Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.icurology.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2020ICU/icu-57-437.pdf
id doaj-89dda89ae0934b5a84330efc7cd59fd4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-89dda89ae0934b5a84330efc7cd59fd42020-11-24T23:44:25ZengKorean Urological AssociationInvestigative and Clinical Urology2466-04932466-054X2016-11-0157643744110.4111/icu.2016.57.6.437Does uroflowmetry parameter facilitate discrimination between detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction?Kwon Soo Lee0Phil Hyun Song1Young Hwii Ko2Yeungnam University College of MedicineYeungnam University College of MedicineYeungnam University College of MedicinePurpose: Though urodynamic study (UDS) is the current established standard to distinguish between detrusor underactivity (DU) and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), concerns of patient discomfort and potential complications of catheterization deters its use. We inspected clinical variables to discriminate between DU and BOO in uroflowmetry, which can be more easily performed in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Total 240 men who both underwent UDS and uroflowmetry were reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups by a single experienced urologist based on UDS outcome; DU (n=111) and BOO (n=129). From uroflowmetry, 5 variables including maximal flow rate (Qmax), average flow rate (Qave), voiding volume (VV), postvoid residual urine (PVR), and value of Qmax minus Qave (DeltaQ) was obtained. Multivariable analysis including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the important diagnostic predictors. Results: The mean age (±standard deviation) was 65.3±9.2 years. Except Qave, all uroflowmetry components were significantly different between DU and BOO groups. DeltaQ was smaller in DU group (8.71 mL/s vs. 5.26 mL/s, p<0.001). By logistic regression analysis, DeltaQ (Exp(B)=0.648, p<0.001) and PVR (Exp(B)=1.009, p<0.001) significantly discriminate DU and BOO diagnosis. In diagnosing DU using a single variable, the area under the curve of ROC from DeltaQ (0.806) was significantly higher than that from Qmax (0.763, p=0.0126) and Qave (0.574, p<0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DeltaQ is a novel predictor capable of discriminating DU from BOO in men with obstructive lower urinary tract symptom.https://www.icurology.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2020ICU/icu-57-437.pdfLower urinary tract symptoms; Urinary bladder neck obstruction; Urodynamics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kwon Soo Lee
Phil Hyun Song
Young Hwii Ko
spellingShingle Kwon Soo Lee
Phil Hyun Song
Young Hwii Ko
Does uroflowmetry parameter facilitate discrimination between detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction?
Investigative and Clinical Urology
Lower urinary tract symptoms; Urinary bladder neck obstruction; Urodynamics
author_facet Kwon Soo Lee
Phil Hyun Song
Young Hwii Ko
author_sort Kwon Soo Lee
title Does uroflowmetry parameter facilitate discrimination between detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction?
title_short Does uroflowmetry parameter facilitate discrimination between detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction?
title_full Does uroflowmetry parameter facilitate discrimination between detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction?
title_fullStr Does uroflowmetry parameter facilitate discrimination between detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction?
title_full_unstemmed Does uroflowmetry parameter facilitate discrimination between detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction?
title_sort does uroflowmetry parameter facilitate discrimination between detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction?
publisher Korean Urological Association
series Investigative and Clinical Urology
issn 2466-0493
2466-054X
publishDate 2016-11-01
description Purpose: Though urodynamic study (UDS) is the current established standard to distinguish between detrusor underactivity (DU) and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), concerns of patient discomfort and potential complications of catheterization deters its use. We inspected clinical variables to discriminate between DU and BOO in uroflowmetry, which can be more easily performed in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Total 240 men who both underwent UDS and uroflowmetry were reviewed. The patients were divided into 2 groups by a single experienced urologist based on UDS outcome; DU (n=111) and BOO (n=129). From uroflowmetry, 5 variables including maximal flow rate (Qmax), average flow rate (Qave), voiding volume (VV), postvoid residual urine (PVR), and value of Qmax minus Qave (DeltaQ) was obtained. Multivariable analysis including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the important diagnostic predictors. Results: The mean age (±standard deviation) was 65.3±9.2 years. Except Qave, all uroflowmetry components were significantly different between DU and BOO groups. DeltaQ was smaller in DU group (8.71 mL/s vs. 5.26 mL/s, p<0.001). By logistic regression analysis, DeltaQ (Exp(B)=0.648, p<0.001) and PVR (Exp(B)=1.009, p<0.001) significantly discriminate DU and BOO diagnosis. In diagnosing DU using a single variable, the area under the curve of ROC from DeltaQ (0.806) was significantly higher than that from Qmax (0.763, p=0.0126) and Qave (0.574, p<0.0001). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DeltaQ is a novel predictor capable of discriminating DU from BOO in men with obstructive lower urinary tract symptom.
topic Lower urinary tract symptoms; Urinary bladder neck obstruction; Urodynamics
url https://www.icurology.org/Synapse/Data/PDFData/2020ICU/icu-57-437.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kwonsoolee doesuroflowmetryparameterfacilitatediscriminationbetweendetrusorunderactivityandbladderoutletobstruction
AT philhyunsong doesuroflowmetryparameterfacilitatediscriminationbetweendetrusorunderactivityandbladderoutletobstruction
AT younghwiiko doesuroflowmetryparameterfacilitatediscriminationbetweendetrusorunderactivityandbladderoutletobstruction
_version_ 1725498646589341696