Comparison of the Effect of Three Methods of Education (Inquirybased Bedside Education and Routine Approach to Clinical Education) on Critical Care Nursing Students Clinical Learning
Background & Objective: Regarding the importance of nursing education promotion there is a need to use methods that have the ability to create knowledge and skills in students This study aimed to assess the effect of education (inquiry bedside education and routine approach to clinical education...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Strides in Development of Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://sdme.kmu.ac.ir/article_90454_174316c6379703ef90af441c106fa79d.pdf |
id |
doaj-900b8cd880e64cc69979b4eabe81848b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-900b8cd880e64cc69979b4eabe81848b2021-01-30T05:42:19ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesStrides in Development of Medical Education2645-34522645-34522016-06-0113213314190454Comparison of the Effect of Three Methods of Education (Inquirybased Bedside Education and Routine Approach to Clinical Education) on Critical Care Nursing Students Clinical LearningParvaneh Asgari0Parvaneh Asgari1Mokhtar Mahmoudi2Fatemeh Bahramnezhad3Fatemeh Bahramnezhad4Fatemeh Rafiei5Mohammad Khajeh-Goodari6M.Sc. in Critical Care Nursing, Instructor, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IranM.Sc. in Critical Care Nursing, Instructor, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IranM.Sc. in Medical Surgical Nursing, Instructor, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IranPh.D. Candidate, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranPh.D. Candidate, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranM.Sc. in Biostatistics, Thyroid Disorders Research Center, Amiralmomenin Hospital, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, IranPh.D. Candidate, Department of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, IranBackground & Objective: Regarding the importance of nursing education promotion there is a need to use methods that have the ability to create knowledge and skills in students This study aimed to assess the effect of education (inquiry bedside education and routine approach to clinical education) on critical care nursing students clinical learning Methods: This quasiexperimental study performed in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Valiasr hospital in Arak Iran during Octobers to March 2014 The subjects were 60 nursing students who were selected via census method and randomly were divided into three groups of 20 subjects After the administration of pretest students in the control group were educated using common method; in one of the experimental groups the inquirybased method and the other group bedside method were used for education for 10 days Then the three groups completed the questionnaires at the end of education again (posttest) Finally data were analyzed using ANOVA pairedt and independentt tests Results: The mean total score of the clinical skills and cognitive domain was significantly difference among the three groups after the intervention (F = 13675 degree of freedom = 2 P = 00001) After testing the homogeneity hypothesis of variances and using GamesHowell posthoc tests the total scores of training in bedside and inquirybased education were significantly more than the routine training after the intervention (P < 00001 and P = 00001 respectively) Conclusion: It seems that two methods inquirybased and bedside education enhanced clinical skills of students Therefore it is recommended to use these two methods of clinical educating to enhance students clinical learninghttp://sdme.kmu.ac.ir/article_90454_174316c6379703ef90af441c106fa79d.pdfinquirybased educationbedside educationroutine approach to clinical educationnursing students |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Parvaneh Asgari Parvaneh Asgari Mokhtar Mahmoudi Fatemeh Bahramnezhad Fatemeh Bahramnezhad Fatemeh Rafiei Mohammad Khajeh-Goodari |
spellingShingle |
Parvaneh Asgari Parvaneh Asgari Mokhtar Mahmoudi Fatemeh Bahramnezhad Fatemeh Bahramnezhad Fatemeh Rafiei Mohammad Khajeh-Goodari Comparison of the Effect of Three Methods of Education (Inquirybased Bedside Education and Routine Approach to Clinical Education) on Critical Care Nursing Students Clinical Learning Strides in Development of Medical Education inquiry based education bedside education routine approach to clinical education nursing students |
author_facet |
Parvaneh Asgari Parvaneh Asgari Mokhtar Mahmoudi Fatemeh Bahramnezhad Fatemeh Bahramnezhad Fatemeh Rafiei Mohammad Khajeh-Goodari |
author_sort |
Parvaneh Asgari |
title |
Comparison of the Effect of Three Methods of Education (Inquirybased Bedside Education and Routine Approach to Clinical Education) on Critical Care Nursing Students Clinical Learning |
title_short |
Comparison of the Effect of Three Methods of Education (Inquirybased Bedside Education and Routine Approach to Clinical Education) on Critical Care Nursing Students Clinical Learning |
title_full |
Comparison of the Effect of Three Methods of Education (Inquirybased Bedside Education and Routine Approach to Clinical Education) on Critical Care Nursing Students Clinical Learning |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of the Effect of Three Methods of Education (Inquirybased Bedside Education and Routine Approach to Clinical Education) on Critical Care Nursing Students Clinical Learning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of the Effect of Three Methods of Education (Inquirybased Bedside Education and Routine Approach to Clinical Education) on Critical Care Nursing Students Clinical Learning |
title_sort |
comparison of the effect of three methods of education (inquirybased bedside education and routine approach to clinical education) on critical care nursing students clinical learning |
publisher |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Strides in Development of Medical Education |
issn |
2645-3452 2645-3452 |
publishDate |
2016-06-01 |
description |
Background & Objective: Regarding the importance of nursing education promotion there is a need to use methods that have the ability to create knowledge and skills in students This study aimed to assess the effect of education (inquiry bedside education and routine approach to clinical education) on critical care nursing students clinical learning Methods: This quasiexperimental study performed in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Valiasr hospital in Arak Iran during Octobers to March 2014 The subjects were 60 nursing students who were selected via census method and randomly were divided into three groups of 20 subjects After the administration of pretest students in the control group were educated using common method; in one of the experimental groups the inquirybased method and the other group bedside method were used for education for 10 days Then the three groups completed the questionnaires at the end of education again (posttest) Finally data were analyzed using ANOVA pairedt and independentt tests Results: The mean total score of the clinical skills and cognitive domain was significantly difference among the three groups after the intervention (F = 13675 degree of freedom = 2 P = 00001) After testing the homogeneity hypothesis of variances and using GamesHowell posthoc tests the total scores of training in bedside and inquirybased education were significantly more than the routine training after the intervention (P < 00001 and P = 00001 respectively) Conclusion: It seems that two methods inquirybased and bedside education enhanced clinical skills of students Therefore it is recommended to use these two methods of clinical educating to enhance students clinical learning |
topic |
inquiry based education bedside education routine approach to clinical education nursing students |
url |
http://sdme.kmu.ac.ir/article_90454_174316c6379703ef90af441c106fa79d.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT parvanehasgari comparisonoftheeffectofthreemethodsofeducationinquirybasedbedsideeducationandroutineapproachtoclinicaleducationoncriticalcarenursingstudentsclinicallearning AT parvanehasgari comparisonoftheeffectofthreemethodsofeducationinquirybasedbedsideeducationandroutineapproachtoclinicaleducationoncriticalcarenursingstudentsclinicallearning AT mokhtarmahmoudi comparisonoftheeffectofthreemethodsofeducationinquirybasedbedsideeducationandroutineapproachtoclinicaleducationoncriticalcarenursingstudentsclinicallearning AT fatemehbahramnezhad comparisonoftheeffectofthreemethodsofeducationinquirybasedbedsideeducationandroutineapproachtoclinicaleducationoncriticalcarenursingstudentsclinicallearning AT fatemehbahramnezhad comparisonoftheeffectofthreemethodsofeducationinquirybasedbedsideeducationandroutineapproachtoclinicaleducationoncriticalcarenursingstudentsclinicallearning AT fatemehrafiei comparisonoftheeffectofthreemethodsofeducationinquirybasedbedsideeducationandroutineapproachtoclinicaleducationoncriticalcarenursingstudentsclinicallearning AT mohammadkhajehgoodari comparisonoftheeffectofthreemethodsofeducationinquirybasedbedsideeducationandroutineapproachtoclinicaleducationoncriticalcarenursingstudentsclinicallearning |
_version_ |
1724318079461097472 |