Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)
The use of biologging instruments has greatly improved our understanding of the behaviour, physiology and ecology of free-ranging marine mammals. However, handling wild animals and attaching instruments to streamlined bodies can cause stress and potentially influence behaviour and swimming/diving en...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Norwegian Polar Institute
2014-02-01
|
Series: | Polar Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/download/21630/pdf_1 |
id |
doaj-92e9c2e2fa9d4aa2bff76162cd45d457 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-92e9c2e2fa9d4aa2bff76162cd45d4572020-11-24T23:46:29Zeng Norwegian Polar InstitutePolar Research0800-03951751-83692014-02-0133011010.3402/polar.v33.2163021630Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)Marie-Anne Blanchet0Christian Lydersen1Martin Biuw2P.J. Nico de Bruyn3Greg Hofmeyr4Bjørn A. Krafft5Kit M. Kovacs6 Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway Department of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa Department of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, NorwayThe use of biologging instruments has greatly improved our understanding of the behaviour, physiology and ecology of free-ranging marine mammals. However, handling wild animals and attaching instruments to streamlined bodies can cause stress and potentially influence behaviour and swimming/diving energetics. The goals of this study, undertaken on Bouvetøya, were (1) to determine if the first trip to sea after instrumentation is representative of subsequent trips in lactating Antarctic fur seals, to explore potential handling effects and assess possible biases in having multiple short-duration deployments (inflating N, using a limited number of tags) and (2) to evaluate potential effects of two different instrument combinations (SMRU satellite data relay loggers and very high frequency radio transmitters versus Wildlife Computers time–depth recorders and very high frequency radio transmitters) on trip durations, dive parameters, female body condition and pup growth. Handling did not appear to have any effects on the parameters studied; data from the first and second trips did not differ significantly. This implies that multiple short-term deployments are unlikely to result in biased data in this species. Instrument type did have measurable effects; time-at-sea was greater and pup growth was lower for pairs in which mothers carried bulkier instruments. This suggests that instrument streamlining is important to avoid negative impacts and that bulkier equipment should be deployed on lactating females with caution and only for short periods. The study highlights that instrument effects should be taken into account when comparing data from experiments collected using different equipment packages.http://www.polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/download/21630/pdf_1Bioenergeticsbiologginginstrument effectsSRDLsTDRsVHFs. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Marie-Anne Blanchet Christian Lydersen Martin Biuw P.J. Nico de Bruyn Greg Hofmeyr Bjørn A. Krafft Kit M. Kovacs |
spellingShingle |
Marie-Anne Blanchet Christian Lydersen Martin Biuw P.J. Nico de Bruyn Greg Hofmeyr Bjørn A. Krafft Kit M. Kovacs Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) Polar Research Bioenergetics biologging instrument effects SRDLs TDRs VHFs. |
author_facet |
Marie-Anne Blanchet Christian Lydersen Martin Biuw P.J. Nico de Bruyn Greg Hofmeyr Bjørn A. Krafft Kit M. Kovacs |
author_sort |
Marie-Anne Blanchet |
title |
Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) |
title_short |
Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) |
title_full |
Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) |
title_fullStr |
Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella) |
title_sort |
instrumentation and handling effects on antarctic fur seals (arctocephalus gazella) |
publisher |
Norwegian Polar Institute |
series |
Polar Research |
issn |
0800-0395 1751-8369 |
publishDate |
2014-02-01 |
description |
The use of biologging instruments has greatly improved our understanding of the behaviour, physiology and ecology of free-ranging marine mammals. However, handling wild animals and attaching instruments to streamlined bodies can cause stress and potentially influence behaviour and swimming/diving energetics. The goals of this study, undertaken on Bouvetøya, were (1) to determine if the first trip to sea after instrumentation is representative of subsequent trips in lactating Antarctic fur seals, to explore potential handling effects and assess possible biases in having multiple short-duration deployments (inflating N, using a limited number of tags) and (2) to evaluate potential effects of two different instrument combinations (SMRU satellite data relay loggers and very high frequency radio transmitters versus Wildlife Computers time–depth recorders and very high frequency radio transmitters) on trip durations, dive parameters, female body condition and pup growth. Handling did not appear to have any effects on the parameters studied; data from the first and second trips did not differ significantly. This implies that multiple short-term deployments are unlikely to result in biased data in this species. Instrument type did have measurable effects; time-at-sea was greater and pup growth was lower for pairs in which mothers carried bulkier instruments. This suggests that instrument streamlining is important to avoid negative impacts and that bulkier equipment should be deployed on lactating females with caution and only for short periods. The study highlights that instrument effects should be taken into account when comparing data from experiments collected using different equipment packages. |
topic |
Bioenergetics biologging instrument effects SRDLs TDRs VHFs. |
url |
http://www.polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/download/21630/pdf_1 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT marieanneblanchet instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella AT christianlydersen instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella AT martinbiuw instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella AT pjnicodebruyn instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella AT greghofmeyr instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella AT bjørnakrafft instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella AT kitmkovacs instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella |
_version_ |
1725493657161695232 |