Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)

The use of biologging instruments has greatly improved our understanding of the behaviour, physiology and ecology of free-ranging marine mammals. However, handling wild animals and attaching instruments to streamlined bodies can cause stress and potentially influence behaviour and swimming/diving en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marie-Anne Blanchet, Christian Lydersen, Martin Biuw, P.J. Nico de Bruyn, Greg Hofmeyr, Bjørn A. Krafft, Kit M. Kovacs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Norwegian Polar Institute 2014-02-01
Series:Polar Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/download/21630/pdf_1
id doaj-92e9c2e2fa9d4aa2bff76162cd45d457
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92e9c2e2fa9d4aa2bff76162cd45d4572020-11-24T23:46:29Zeng Norwegian Polar InstitutePolar Research0800-03951751-83692014-02-0133011010.3402/polar.v33.2163021630Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)Marie-Anne Blanchet0Christian Lydersen1Martin Biuw2P.J. Nico de Bruyn3Greg Hofmeyr4Bjørn A. Krafft5Kit M. Kovacs6 Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway Department of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa Department of Zoology and Entomology, Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, Pretoria, South Africa Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, Norway Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, NO-9296 Tromsø, NorwayThe use of biologging instruments has greatly improved our understanding of the behaviour, physiology and ecology of free-ranging marine mammals. However, handling wild animals and attaching instruments to streamlined bodies can cause stress and potentially influence behaviour and swimming/diving energetics. The goals of this study, undertaken on Bouvetøya, were (1) to determine if the first trip to sea after instrumentation is representative of subsequent trips in lactating Antarctic fur seals, to explore potential handling effects and assess possible biases in having multiple short-duration deployments (inflating N, using a limited number of tags) and (2) to evaluate potential effects of two different instrument combinations (SMRU satellite data relay loggers and very high frequency radio transmitters versus Wildlife Computers time–depth recorders and very high frequency radio transmitters) on trip durations, dive parameters, female body condition and pup growth. Handling did not appear to have any effects on the parameters studied; data from the first and second trips did not differ significantly. This implies that multiple short-term deployments are unlikely to result in biased data in this species. Instrument type did have measurable effects; time-at-sea was greater and pup growth was lower for pairs in which mothers carried bulkier instruments. This suggests that instrument streamlining is important to avoid negative impacts and that bulkier equipment should be deployed on lactating females with caution and only for short periods. The study highlights that instrument effects should be taken into account when comparing data from experiments collected using different equipment packages.http://www.polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/download/21630/pdf_1Bioenergeticsbiologginginstrument effectsSRDLsTDRsVHFs.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marie-Anne Blanchet
Christian Lydersen
Martin Biuw
P.J. Nico de Bruyn
Greg Hofmeyr
Bjørn A. Krafft
Kit M. Kovacs
spellingShingle Marie-Anne Blanchet
Christian Lydersen
Martin Biuw
P.J. Nico de Bruyn
Greg Hofmeyr
Bjørn A. Krafft
Kit M. Kovacs
Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)
Polar Research
Bioenergetics
biologging
instrument effects
SRDLs
TDRs
VHFs.
author_facet Marie-Anne Blanchet
Christian Lydersen
Martin Biuw
P.J. Nico de Bruyn
Greg Hofmeyr
Bjørn A. Krafft
Kit M. Kovacs
author_sort Marie-Anne Blanchet
title Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)
title_short Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)
title_full Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)
title_fullStr Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)
title_full_unstemmed Instrumentation and handling effects on Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)
title_sort instrumentation and handling effects on antarctic fur seals (arctocephalus gazella)
publisher Norwegian Polar Institute
series Polar Research
issn 0800-0395
1751-8369
publishDate 2014-02-01
description The use of biologging instruments has greatly improved our understanding of the behaviour, physiology and ecology of free-ranging marine mammals. However, handling wild animals and attaching instruments to streamlined bodies can cause stress and potentially influence behaviour and swimming/diving energetics. The goals of this study, undertaken on Bouvetøya, were (1) to determine if the first trip to sea after instrumentation is representative of subsequent trips in lactating Antarctic fur seals, to explore potential handling effects and assess possible biases in having multiple short-duration deployments (inflating N, using a limited number of tags) and (2) to evaluate potential effects of two different instrument combinations (SMRU satellite data relay loggers and very high frequency radio transmitters versus Wildlife Computers time–depth recorders and very high frequency radio transmitters) on trip durations, dive parameters, female body condition and pup growth. Handling did not appear to have any effects on the parameters studied; data from the first and second trips did not differ significantly. This implies that multiple short-term deployments are unlikely to result in biased data in this species. Instrument type did have measurable effects; time-at-sea was greater and pup growth was lower for pairs in which mothers carried bulkier instruments. This suggests that instrument streamlining is important to avoid negative impacts and that bulkier equipment should be deployed on lactating females with caution and only for short periods. The study highlights that instrument effects should be taken into account when comparing data from experiments collected using different equipment packages.
topic Bioenergetics
biologging
instrument effects
SRDLs
TDRs
VHFs.
url http://www.polarresearch.net/index.php/polar/article/download/21630/pdf_1
work_keys_str_mv AT marieanneblanchet instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella
AT christianlydersen instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella
AT martinbiuw instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella
AT pjnicodebruyn instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella
AT greghofmeyr instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella
AT bjørnakrafft instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella
AT kitmkovacs instrumentationandhandlingeffectsonantarcticfursealsarctocephalusgazella
_version_ 1725493657161695232