One touch of Venus. Notes on a cardiac arrest at the Uffizi

A recent cardiovascular event at the Galleria degli Uffizi in Florence in December 2018 involving an elderly Tuscan male gathered significant media attention, being promptly reported as another case of the so-called Stendhal syndrome. The victim was at the Botticelli room the moment he lost conscio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ianick Takaes de Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2020-05-01
Series:Figura
Subjects:
Online Access:https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/figura/article/view/13579
id doaj-97bc134c442f462db02087d86c218af5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-97bc134c442f462db02087d86c218af52021-06-22T16:11:30ZporUniversidade Estadual de CampinasFigura2317-46252020-05-018110.20396/figura.v8i1.13579One touch of Venus. Notes on a cardiac arrest at the UffiziIanick Takaes de Oliveira0Columbia University A recent cardiovascular event at the Galleria degli Uffizi in Florence in December 2018 involving an elderly Tuscan male gathered significant media attention, being promptly reported as another case of the so-called Stendhal syndrome. The victim was at the Botticelli room the moment he lost consciousness, purportedly gazing at the Birth of Venus. Medical support was made immediately available, assuring the patient’s survival. Taking the 2018 cardiovascular event as a case study, this paper addresses the emergence of the Stendhal syndrome (as defined by the Florentine psychiatrist Graziella Magherini from the 1970s onwards) and similar worldwide syndromes, such as the Jerusalem, Paris, India, White House, and Rubens syndromes. Their congeniality and coevality speak in favor of their understanding as a set of interconnected phenomena made possible partly by the rise of global tourism and associated aestheticreligious anxieties, partly by the migration of ideas concerning artistic experience in extremis. While media coverage and most art historical writings have discussed the Stendhal syndrome as a quizzical phenomenon – one which serves more or less to justify the belief in the “power of art” –, our purpose in this paper is to (1) question the etiological specificity of the Stendhal syndrome and, therefore, its appellation as such; (2) argue in favor of a more precise neuroesthetic explanation for the incident at the Uffizi; (3) raise questions about the fraught connection between health-related events caused by artworks and the aesthetic experience. https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/figura/article/view/13579Stendhal syndromeaesthetic experienceGalleria degli Uffizi
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ianick Takaes de Oliveira
spellingShingle Ianick Takaes de Oliveira
One touch of Venus. Notes on a cardiac arrest at the Uffizi
Figura
Stendhal syndrome
aesthetic experience
Galleria degli Uffizi
author_facet Ianick Takaes de Oliveira
author_sort Ianick Takaes de Oliveira
title One touch of Venus. Notes on a cardiac arrest at the Uffizi
title_short One touch of Venus. Notes on a cardiac arrest at the Uffizi
title_full One touch of Venus. Notes on a cardiac arrest at the Uffizi
title_fullStr One touch of Venus. Notes on a cardiac arrest at the Uffizi
title_full_unstemmed One touch of Venus. Notes on a cardiac arrest at the Uffizi
title_sort one touch of venus. notes on a cardiac arrest at the uffizi
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Figura
issn 2317-4625
publishDate 2020-05-01
description A recent cardiovascular event at the Galleria degli Uffizi in Florence in December 2018 involving an elderly Tuscan male gathered significant media attention, being promptly reported as another case of the so-called Stendhal syndrome. The victim was at the Botticelli room the moment he lost consciousness, purportedly gazing at the Birth of Venus. Medical support was made immediately available, assuring the patient’s survival. Taking the 2018 cardiovascular event as a case study, this paper addresses the emergence of the Stendhal syndrome (as defined by the Florentine psychiatrist Graziella Magherini from the 1970s onwards) and similar worldwide syndromes, such as the Jerusalem, Paris, India, White House, and Rubens syndromes. Their congeniality and coevality speak in favor of their understanding as a set of interconnected phenomena made possible partly by the rise of global tourism and associated aestheticreligious anxieties, partly by the migration of ideas concerning artistic experience in extremis. While media coverage and most art historical writings have discussed the Stendhal syndrome as a quizzical phenomenon – one which serves more or less to justify the belief in the “power of art” –, our purpose in this paper is to (1) question the etiological specificity of the Stendhal syndrome and, therefore, its appellation as such; (2) argue in favor of a more precise neuroesthetic explanation for the incident at the Uffizi; (3) raise questions about the fraught connection between health-related events caused by artworks and the aesthetic experience.
topic Stendhal syndrome
aesthetic experience
Galleria degli Uffizi
url https://econtents.bc.unicamp.br/inpec/index.php/figura/article/view/13579
work_keys_str_mv AT ianicktakaesdeoliveira onetouchofvenusnotesonacardiacarrestattheuffizi
_version_ 1721363067701297152