A comparison of sex identification methods based on lip furrow pattern

The objective of the study was to specify the method with the highest probability of correct sex identification based on lip furrow pattern. Three methods were verified: Vahanwala’s method, identification based on the mid-section of lower lip print and our own method. The examined group included 242...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Topczyłko Aleksandra, Borysławski Krzysztof, Nowakowski Dariusz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-03-01
Series:Anthropological Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2018-0004
id doaj-98a3613f721d4b91a0cb4f4a85dcf9a4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98a3613f721d4b91a0cb4f4a85dcf9a42021-09-06T19:41:12ZengSciendoAnthropological Review2083-45942018-03-01811455210.2478/anre-2018-0004anre-2018-0004A comparison of sex identification methods based on lip furrow patternTopczyłko Aleksandra0Borysławski Krzysztof1Nowakowski Dariusz2Department of Anthropology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life SciencesDepartment of Anthropology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life SciencesDepartment of Anthropology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life SciencesThe objective of the study was to specify the method with the highest probability of correct sex identification based on lip furrow pattern. Three methods were verified: Vahanwala’s method, identification based on the mid-section of lower lip print and our own method. The examined group included 242 persons aged 15-30 years, 68.6% females and 31.4% males. Cheilograms were taken with the method proposed by Vanahwala, modified in such a way that the prints of lower and upper lips were taken separately. The lip furrow patterns were classified according to Suzuki and Tsuchihashi, modified to include horizontal furrows which were considered by Renaud. In all the quadrants patterns II, III and VI prevailed among males and patterns I, I’ and II among females. Females were more frequently diagnosed correctly than males. Our method in which all the lip print was analysed without division into quadrants was the most effective, while Vahanwala’s method was the least so.https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2018-0004cheiloscopycheilogramlip prints
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Topczyłko Aleksandra
Borysławski Krzysztof
Nowakowski Dariusz
spellingShingle Topczyłko Aleksandra
Borysławski Krzysztof
Nowakowski Dariusz
A comparison of sex identification methods based on lip furrow pattern
Anthropological Review
cheiloscopy
cheilogram
lip prints
author_facet Topczyłko Aleksandra
Borysławski Krzysztof
Nowakowski Dariusz
author_sort Topczyłko Aleksandra
title A comparison of sex identification methods based on lip furrow pattern
title_short A comparison of sex identification methods based on lip furrow pattern
title_full A comparison of sex identification methods based on lip furrow pattern
title_fullStr A comparison of sex identification methods based on lip furrow pattern
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of sex identification methods based on lip furrow pattern
title_sort comparison of sex identification methods based on lip furrow pattern
publisher Sciendo
series Anthropological Review
issn 2083-4594
publishDate 2018-03-01
description The objective of the study was to specify the method with the highest probability of correct sex identification based on lip furrow pattern. Three methods were verified: Vahanwala’s method, identification based on the mid-section of lower lip print and our own method. The examined group included 242 persons aged 15-30 years, 68.6% females and 31.4% males. Cheilograms were taken with the method proposed by Vanahwala, modified in such a way that the prints of lower and upper lips were taken separately. The lip furrow patterns were classified according to Suzuki and Tsuchihashi, modified to include horizontal furrows which were considered by Renaud. In all the quadrants patterns II, III and VI prevailed among males and patterns I, I’ and II among females. Females were more frequently diagnosed correctly than males. Our method in which all the lip print was analysed without division into quadrants was the most effective, while Vahanwala’s method was the least so.
topic cheiloscopy
cheilogram
lip prints
url https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2018-0004
work_keys_str_mv AT topczyłkoaleksandra acomparisonofsexidentificationmethodsbasedonlipfurrowpattern
AT borysławskikrzysztof acomparisonofsexidentificationmethodsbasedonlipfurrowpattern
AT nowakowskidariusz acomparisonofsexidentificationmethodsbasedonlipfurrowpattern
AT topczyłkoaleksandra comparisonofsexidentificationmethodsbasedonlipfurrowpattern
AT borysławskikrzysztof comparisonofsexidentificationmethodsbasedonlipfurrowpattern
AT nowakowskidariusz comparisonofsexidentificationmethodsbasedonlipfurrowpattern
_version_ 1717766844675260416