The ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in Serbia and other region countries

In Serbia it is prescribed that foreign legal or natural persons could not become owners of agricultural land, while in Montenegro, Croatia and The Federation of Bosnia and Hercegovina there is the ban for both agricultural and forest land. The aim of this paper is to show that such a ban creates an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baturan Luka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law 2013-01-01
Series:Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
Subjects:
Online Access:http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2013/0550-21791302515B.pdf
id doaj-98f86f313f11467e93342291d22095bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-98f86f313f11467e93342291d22095bd2020-11-24T22:45:17ZengUniversity of Novi Sad, Faculty of LawZbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu0550-21792406-12552013-01-0147251553110.5937/zrpfns47-44460550-21791302515BThe ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in Serbia and other region countriesBaturan Luka0University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law, Novi Sad, SerbiaIn Serbia it is prescribed that foreign legal or natural persons could not become owners of agricultural land, while in Montenegro, Croatia and The Federation of Bosnia and Hercegovina there is the ban for both agricultural and forest land. The aim of this paper is to show that such a ban creates an economic environment where an optimal allocation of agricultural and forest land as a production factor could not be achieved. The cost - benefit analysis shows that main gainers are domestic producers and buyers of land who are able to realize a monopoly profit, whereas sellers of land are at loss, getting a lower economic rent, as well as foreign buyers. A total loss of domestic sellers only is bigger than a total profit of buyers. In the end, it is being pointed to a relativity of the ban, in the sense of a possibility to easily get past the ban through provisions of the other norms. The conclusion points out that an eventual suspension of the ban would stimulate efficiency of domestic economies and an increase in the neto welfare.http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2013/0550-21791302515B.pdfagricultural landforest landproperty rightforeigners
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Baturan Luka
spellingShingle Baturan Luka
The ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in Serbia and other region countries
Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
agricultural land
forest land
property right
foreigners
author_facet Baturan Luka
author_sort Baturan Luka
title The ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in Serbia and other region countries
title_short The ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in Serbia and other region countries
title_full The ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in Serbia and other region countries
title_fullStr The ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in Serbia and other region countries
title_full_unstemmed The ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in Serbia and other region countries
title_sort ban on foreigners acquiring property rights on agricultural and forest land in serbia and other region countries
publisher University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Law
series Zbornik Radova: Pravni Fakultet u Novom Sadu
issn 0550-2179
2406-1255
publishDate 2013-01-01
description In Serbia it is prescribed that foreign legal or natural persons could not become owners of agricultural land, while in Montenegro, Croatia and The Federation of Bosnia and Hercegovina there is the ban for both agricultural and forest land. The aim of this paper is to show that such a ban creates an economic environment where an optimal allocation of agricultural and forest land as a production factor could not be achieved. The cost - benefit analysis shows that main gainers are domestic producers and buyers of land who are able to realize a monopoly profit, whereas sellers of land are at loss, getting a lower economic rent, as well as foreign buyers. A total loss of domestic sellers only is bigger than a total profit of buyers. In the end, it is being pointed to a relativity of the ban, in the sense of a possibility to easily get past the ban through provisions of the other norms. The conclusion points out that an eventual suspension of the ban would stimulate efficiency of domestic economies and an increase in the neto welfare.
topic agricultural land
forest land
property right
foreigners
url http://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0550-2179/2013/0550-21791302515B.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT baturanluka thebanonforeignersacquiringpropertyrightsonagriculturalandforestlandinserbiaandotherregioncountries
AT baturanluka banonforeignersacquiringpropertyrightsonagriculturalandforestlandinserbiaandotherregioncountries
_version_ 1725689284710629376