Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze incidental CT findings of traffic injury patients discharged from the ER, and to determine overall notification rates. Methods: All traffic injury-related patient records between 01.06.2013–01.03.2013 were obtained from Derince Training...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yavuz YIGIT, Harun AYHAN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2014-03-01
Series:Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452247316300334
id doaj-991ac3aa0b3f49a982fa27abb19cc64e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-991ac3aa0b3f49a982fa27abb19cc64e2021-03-02T08:58:26ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTurkish Journal of Emergency Medicine2452-24732014-03-0114191410.5505/1304.7361.2014.13284Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic AccidentYavuz YIGIT0Harun AYHAN1Derince Training and Research Hospital, KocaeliHaydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, İstanbulObjective: The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze incidental CT findings of traffic injury patients discharged from the ER, and to determine overall notification rates. Methods: All traffic injury-related patient records between 01.06.2013–01.03.2013 were obtained from Derince Training and Research Hospital Emergency Service using patient files and the hospital database. Brain, thorax and/or abdominal CT images of 340 patients aged between 0 to 84 years were included in the study. ER observation forms were investigated for the patients who had incidental findings on CT scanning and overall notification rates were recorded. Results: Mean age of the 363 cases was 31.2 (SD 17.9, min 0, max 84) and 35.5% of patients were female (n=129) and 64.5% were male (n=234). A total of 537 CT scans were performed on 363 patients. 147, 319 and 71 CT scans were performed on the thorax, brain and abdominal, respectively. 27.3% (n=99) of scan results showed the presence of a coincidental pathology. The most common disease on scans were bone lesions (8%, n=29), followed by sinus abnormalities (7.7%, n=28). Incidental findings ratio in patients aged over 60 was 60.8%, while under 60 was 24.8%. It was found that seven patients (7.1%) were informed about the imaging results. Conclusion: Most of the incidental findings were found to be benign; however, 16.5% of them were considered to require in-depth investigation. Further investigations are needed to understand the clinical relevance of these findings and their effects on patients.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452247316300334Incidental findingstomography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yavuz YIGIT
Harun AYHAN
spellingShingle Yavuz YIGIT
Harun AYHAN
Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
Incidental findings
tomography
author_facet Yavuz YIGIT
Harun AYHAN
author_sort Yavuz YIGIT
title Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_short Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_full Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_fullStr Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_full_unstemmed Incidental CT Findings of Patients Who Admitted to ER Following a Traffic Accident
title_sort incidental ct findings of patients who admitted to er following a traffic accident
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine
issn 2452-2473
publishDate 2014-03-01
description Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate and analyze incidental CT findings of traffic injury patients discharged from the ER, and to determine overall notification rates. Methods: All traffic injury-related patient records between 01.06.2013–01.03.2013 were obtained from Derince Training and Research Hospital Emergency Service using patient files and the hospital database. Brain, thorax and/or abdominal CT images of 340 patients aged between 0 to 84 years were included in the study. ER observation forms were investigated for the patients who had incidental findings on CT scanning and overall notification rates were recorded. Results: Mean age of the 363 cases was 31.2 (SD 17.9, min 0, max 84) and 35.5% of patients were female (n=129) and 64.5% were male (n=234). A total of 537 CT scans were performed on 363 patients. 147, 319 and 71 CT scans were performed on the thorax, brain and abdominal, respectively. 27.3% (n=99) of scan results showed the presence of a coincidental pathology. The most common disease on scans were bone lesions (8%, n=29), followed by sinus abnormalities (7.7%, n=28). Incidental findings ratio in patients aged over 60 was 60.8%, while under 60 was 24.8%. It was found that seven patients (7.1%) were informed about the imaging results. Conclusion: Most of the incidental findings were found to be benign; however, 16.5% of them were considered to require in-depth investigation. Further investigations are needed to understand the clinical relevance of these findings and their effects on patients.
topic Incidental findings
tomography
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452247316300334
work_keys_str_mv AT yavuzyigit incidentalctfindingsofpatientswhoadmittedtoerfollowingatrafficaccident
AT harunayhan incidentalctfindingsofpatientswhoadmittedtoerfollowingatrafficaccident
_version_ 1724240201261252608