Use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in Africa and Asia – testing assumptions

Background: Comparing self-rating health responses across individuals and cultures is misleading due to different reporting behaviors. Anchoring vignettes is a technique that allows identifying and adjusting self-rating responses for reporting heterogeneity (RH). Objective: This article aims to test...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Siddhivinayak Hirve, Xavier Gómez-Olivé, Samuel Oti, Cornelius Debpuur, Sanjay Juvekar, Stephen Tollman, Yulia Blomstedt, Stig Wall, Nawi Ng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2013-09-01
Series:Global Health Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/download/21064/pdf_1
id doaj-9a30d34bb0ef4c75a89fa76f6238fa88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9a30d34bb0ef4c75a89fa76f6238fa882020-11-24T22:34:29ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-98802013-09-016011510.3402/gha.v6i0.21064Use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in Africa and Asia – testing assumptionsSiddhivinayak HirveXavier Gómez-OlivéSamuel OtiCornelius DebpuurSanjay JuvekarStephen TollmanYulia BlomstedtStig WallNawi NgBackground: Comparing self-rating health responses across individuals and cultures is misleading due to different reporting behaviors. Anchoring vignettes is a technique that allows identifying and adjusting self-rating responses for reporting heterogeneity (RH). Objective: This article aims to test two crucial assumptions of vignette equivalence (VE) and response consistency (RC) that are required to be met before vignettes can be used to adjust self-rating responses for RH. Design: We used self-ratings, vignettes, and objective measures covering domains of mobility and cognition from the WHO study on global AGEing and adult health, administered to older adults aged 50 years and above from eight low- and middle-income countries in Africa and Asia. For VE, we specified a hierarchical ordered probit (HOPIT) model to test for equality of perceived vignette locations. For RC, we tested for equality of thresholds that are used to rate vignettes with thresholds derived from objective measures and used to rate their own health function. Results: There was evidence of RH in self-rating responses for difficulty in mobility and cognition. Assumptions of VE and RC between countries were violated driven by age, sex, and education. However, within a country context, assumption of VE was met in some countries (mainly in Africa, except Tanzania) and violated in others (mainly in Asia, except India). Conclusion: We conclude that violation of assumptions of RC and VE precluded the use of anchoring vignettes to adjust self-rated responses for RH across countries in Asia and Africa.www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/download/21064/pdf_1reporting heterogeneitymobilitycognitionself-ratinganchoring vignettesvignette equivalenceresponse consistency
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Siddhivinayak Hirve
Xavier Gómez-Olivé
Samuel Oti
Cornelius Debpuur
Sanjay Juvekar
Stephen Tollman
Yulia Blomstedt
Stig Wall
Nawi Ng
spellingShingle Siddhivinayak Hirve
Xavier Gómez-Olivé
Samuel Oti
Cornelius Debpuur
Sanjay Juvekar
Stephen Tollman
Yulia Blomstedt
Stig Wall
Nawi Ng
Use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in Africa and Asia – testing assumptions
Global Health Action
reporting heterogeneity
mobility
cognition
self-rating
anchoring vignettes
vignette equivalence
response consistency
author_facet Siddhivinayak Hirve
Xavier Gómez-Olivé
Samuel Oti
Cornelius Debpuur
Sanjay Juvekar
Stephen Tollman
Yulia Blomstedt
Stig Wall
Nawi Ng
author_sort Siddhivinayak Hirve
title Use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in Africa and Asia – testing assumptions
title_short Use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in Africa and Asia – testing assumptions
title_full Use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in Africa and Asia – testing assumptions
title_fullStr Use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in Africa and Asia – testing assumptions
title_full_unstemmed Use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in Africa and Asia – testing assumptions
title_sort use of anchoring vignettes to evaluate health reporting behavior amongst adults aged 50 years and above in africa and asia – testing assumptions
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Global Health Action
issn 1654-9880
publishDate 2013-09-01
description Background: Comparing self-rating health responses across individuals and cultures is misleading due to different reporting behaviors. Anchoring vignettes is a technique that allows identifying and adjusting self-rating responses for reporting heterogeneity (RH). Objective: This article aims to test two crucial assumptions of vignette equivalence (VE) and response consistency (RC) that are required to be met before vignettes can be used to adjust self-rating responses for RH. Design: We used self-ratings, vignettes, and objective measures covering domains of mobility and cognition from the WHO study on global AGEing and adult health, administered to older adults aged 50 years and above from eight low- and middle-income countries in Africa and Asia. For VE, we specified a hierarchical ordered probit (HOPIT) model to test for equality of perceived vignette locations. For RC, we tested for equality of thresholds that are used to rate vignettes with thresholds derived from objective measures and used to rate their own health function. Results: There was evidence of RH in self-rating responses for difficulty in mobility and cognition. Assumptions of VE and RC between countries were violated driven by age, sex, and education. However, within a country context, assumption of VE was met in some countries (mainly in Africa, except Tanzania) and violated in others (mainly in Asia, except India). Conclusion: We conclude that violation of assumptions of RC and VE precluded the use of anchoring vignettes to adjust self-rated responses for RH across countries in Asia and Africa.
topic reporting heterogeneity
mobility
cognition
self-rating
anchoring vignettes
vignette equivalence
response consistency
url http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/download/21064/pdf_1
work_keys_str_mv AT siddhivinayakhirve useofanchoringvignettestoevaluatehealthreportingbehavioramongstadultsaged50yearsandaboveinafricaandasiax2013testingassumptions
AT xaviergx00f3mezolivx00e9 useofanchoringvignettestoevaluatehealthreportingbehavioramongstadultsaged50yearsandaboveinafricaandasiax2013testingassumptions
AT samueloti useofanchoringvignettestoevaluatehealthreportingbehavioramongstadultsaged50yearsandaboveinafricaandasiax2013testingassumptions
AT corneliusdebpuur useofanchoringvignettestoevaluatehealthreportingbehavioramongstadultsaged50yearsandaboveinafricaandasiax2013testingassumptions
AT sanjayjuvekar useofanchoringvignettestoevaluatehealthreportingbehavioramongstadultsaged50yearsandaboveinafricaandasiax2013testingassumptions
AT stephentollman useofanchoringvignettestoevaluatehealthreportingbehavioramongstadultsaged50yearsandaboveinafricaandasiax2013testingassumptions
AT yuliablomstedt useofanchoringvignettestoevaluatehealthreportingbehavioramongstadultsaged50yearsandaboveinafricaandasiax2013testingassumptions
AT stigwall useofanchoringvignettestoevaluatehealthreportingbehavioramongstadultsaged50yearsandaboveinafricaandasiax2013testingassumptions
AT nawing useofanchoringvignettestoevaluatehealthreportingbehavioramongstadultsaged50yearsandaboveinafricaandasiax2013testingassumptions
_version_ 1725727262778589184