Evaluation of Marine Agarose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications

Five agarose types (D1LE, D2LE, LM, MS8 and D5) were evaluated in tissue engineering and compared for the first time using an array of analysis methods. Acellular and cellular constructs were generated from 0.3–3%, and their biomechanical properties, in vivo biocompatibility (as determined by LIVE/D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ainhoa Irastorza-Lorenzo, David Sánchez-Porras, Olimpia Ortiz-Arrabal, María José de Frutos, Emilio Esteban, Javier Fernández, Agustín Janer, Antonio Campos, Fernando Campos, Miguel Alaminos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/4/1923
id doaj-a1a0197a06d348e5b5df24e907acc4e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a1a0197a06d348e5b5df24e907acc4e62021-02-16T00:03:02ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1661-65961422-00672021-02-01221923192310.3390/ijms22041923Evaluation of Marine Agarose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering ApplicationsAinhoa Irastorza-Lorenzo0David Sánchez-Porras1Olimpia Ortiz-Arrabal2María José de Frutos3Emilio Esteban4Javier Fernández5Agustín Janer6Antonio Campos7Fernando Campos8Miguel Alaminos9Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, University of Granada and Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, E18016 Granada, SpainTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, University of Granada and Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, E18016 Granada, SpainTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, University of Granada and Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, E18016 Granada, SpainHispanagar, SA, E09001 Burgos, SpainHispanagar, SA, E09001 Burgos, SpainHispanagar, SA, E09001 Burgos, SpainHispanagar, SA, E09001 Burgos, SpainTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, University of Granada and Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, E18016 Granada, SpainTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, University of Granada and Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, E18016 Granada, SpainTissue Engineering Group, Department of Histology, University of Granada and Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, E18016 Granada, SpainFive agarose types (D1LE, D2LE, LM, MS8 and D5) were evaluated in tissue engineering and compared for the first time using an array of analysis methods. Acellular and cellular constructs were generated from 0.3–3%, and their biomechanical properties, in vivo biocompatibility (as determined by LIVE/DEAD, WST-1 and DNA release, with <i>n</i> = 6 per sample) and in vivo biocompatibility (by hematological and biochemical analyses and histology, with <i>n</i> = 4 animals per agarose type) were analyzed. Results revealed that the biomechanical properties of each hydrogel were related to the agarose concentration (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding the agarose type, the highest (<i>p</i> < 0.001) Young modulus, stress at fracture and break load were D1LE, D2LE and D5, whereas the strain at fracture was higher in D5 and MS8 at 3% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). All agaroses showed high biocompatibility on human skin cells, especially in indirect contact, with a correlation with agarose concentration (<i>p</i> = 0.0074 for LIVE/DEAD and <i>p</i> = 0.0014 for WST-1) and type, although cell function tended to decrease in direct contact with highly concentrated agaroses. All agaroses were safe in vivo, with no systemic effects as determined by hematological and biochemical analysis and histology of major organs. Locally, implants were partially encapsulated and a pro-regenerative response with abundant M2-type macrophages was found. In summary, we may state that all these agarose types can be safely used in tissue engineering and that the biomechanical properties and biocompatibility were strongly associated to the agarose concentration in the hydrogel and partially associated to the agarose type. These results open the door to the generation of specific agarose-based hydrogels for definite clinical applications such as the human skin, cornea or oral mucosa.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/4/1923agarosetissue engineeringbiomaterialsbiocompatibilitybiomechanical properties
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ainhoa Irastorza-Lorenzo
David Sánchez-Porras
Olimpia Ortiz-Arrabal
María José de Frutos
Emilio Esteban
Javier Fernández
Agustín Janer
Antonio Campos
Fernando Campos
Miguel Alaminos
spellingShingle Ainhoa Irastorza-Lorenzo
David Sánchez-Porras
Olimpia Ortiz-Arrabal
María José de Frutos
Emilio Esteban
Javier Fernández
Agustín Janer
Antonio Campos
Fernando Campos
Miguel Alaminos
Evaluation of Marine Agarose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
agarose
tissue engineering
biomaterials
biocompatibility
biomechanical properties
author_facet Ainhoa Irastorza-Lorenzo
David Sánchez-Porras
Olimpia Ortiz-Arrabal
María José de Frutos
Emilio Esteban
Javier Fernández
Agustín Janer
Antonio Campos
Fernando Campos
Miguel Alaminos
author_sort Ainhoa Irastorza-Lorenzo
title Evaluation of Marine Agarose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications
title_short Evaluation of Marine Agarose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications
title_full Evaluation of Marine Agarose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications
title_fullStr Evaluation of Marine Agarose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Marine Agarose Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications
title_sort evaluation of marine agarose biomaterials for tissue engineering applications
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Five agarose types (D1LE, D2LE, LM, MS8 and D5) were evaluated in tissue engineering and compared for the first time using an array of analysis methods. Acellular and cellular constructs were generated from 0.3–3%, and their biomechanical properties, in vivo biocompatibility (as determined by LIVE/DEAD, WST-1 and DNA release, with <i>n</i> = 6 per sample) and in vivo biocompatibility (by hematological and biochemical analyses and histology, with <i>n</i> = 4 animals per agarose type) were analyzed. Results revealed that the biomechanical properties of each hydrogel were related to the agarose concentration (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Regarding the agarose type, the highest (<i>p</i> < 0.001) Young modulus, stress at fracture and break load were D1LE, D2LE and D5, whereas the strain at fracture was higher in D5 and MS8 at 3% (<i>p</i> < 0.05). All agaroses showed high biocompatibility on human skin cells, especially in indirect contact, with a correlation with agarose concentration (<i>p</i> = 0.0074 for LIVE/DEAD and <i>p</i> = 0.0014 for WST-1) and type, although cell function tended to decrease in direct contact with highly concentrated agaroses. All agaroses were safe in vivo, with no systemic effects as determined by hematological and biochemical analysis and histology of major organs. Locally, implants were partially encapsulated and a pro-regenerative response with abundant M2-type macrophages was found. In summary, we may state that all these agarose types can be safely used in tissue engineering and that the biomechanical properties and biocompatibility were strongly associated to the agarose concentration in the hydrogel and partially associated to the agarose type. These results open the door to the generation of specific agarose-based hydrogels for definite clinical applications such as the human skin, cornea or oral mucosa.
topic agarose
tissue engineering
biomaterials
biocompatibility
biomechanical properties
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/22/4/1923
work_keys_str_mv AT ainhoairastorzalorenzo evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
AT davidsanchezporras evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
AT olimpiaortizarrabal evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
AT mariajosedefrutos evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
AT emilioesteban evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
AT javierfernandez evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
AT agustinjaner evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
AT antoniocampos evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
AT fernandocampos evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
AT miguelalaminos evaluationofmarineagarosebiomaterialsfortissueengineeringapplications
_version_ 1724268652654493696