Biomechanics and the thermotolerance of development.

Successful completion of development requires coordination of patterning events with morphogenetic movements. Environmental variability challenges this coordination. For example, developing organisms encounter varying environmental temperatures that can strongly influence developmental rates. We hyp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelangelo von Dassow, Callie Johnson Miller, Lance A Davidson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4002435?pdf=render
id doaj-a4b60de639c447fda890e47c4eb61eb5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4b60de639c447fda890e47c4eb61eb52020-11-24T20:50:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9567010.1371/journal.pone.0095670Biomechanics and the thermotolerance of development.Michelangelo von DassowCallie Johnson MillerLance A DavidsonSuccessful completion of development requires coordination of patterning events with morphogenetic movements. Environmental variability challenges this coordination. For example, developing organisms encounter varying environmental temperatures that can strongly influence developmental rates. We hypothesized that the mechanics of morphogenesis would have to be finely adjusted to allow for normal morphogenesis across a wide range of developmental rates. We formulated our hypothesis as a simple model incorporating time-dependent application of force to a viscoelastic tissue. This model suggested that the capacity to maintain normal morphogenesis across a range of temperatures would depend on how both tissue viscoelasticity and the forces that drive deformation vary with temperature. To test this model we investigated how the mechanical behavior of embryonic tissue (Xenopus laevis) changed with temperature; we used a combination of micropipette aspiration to measure viscoelasticity, electrically induced contractions to measure cellular force generation, and confocal microscopy to measure endogenous contractility. Contrary to expectations, the viscoelasticity of the tissues and peak contractile tension proved invariant with temperature even as rates of force generation and gastrulation movements varied three-fold. Furthermore, the relative rates of different gastrulation movements varied with temperature: the speed of blastopore closure increased more slowly with temperature than the speed of the dorsal-to-ventral progression of involution. The changes in the relative rates of different tissue movements can be explained by the viscoelastic deformation model given observed viscoelastic properties, but only if morphogenetic forces increase slowly rather than all at once.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4002435?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michelangelo von Dassow
Callie Johnson Miller
Lance A Davidson
spellingShingle Michelangelo von Dassow
Callie Johnson Miller
Lance A Davidson
Biomechanics and the thermotolerance of development.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Michelangelo von Dassow
Callie Johnson Miller
Lance A Davidson
author_sort Michelangelo von Dassow
title Biomechanics and the thermotolerance of development.
title_short Biomechanics and the thermotolerance of development.
title_full Biomechanics and the thermotolerance of development.
title_fullStr Biomechanics and the thermotolerance of development.
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanics and the thermotolerance of development.
title_sort biomechanics and the thermotolerance of development.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Successful completion of development requires coordination of patterning events with morphogenetic movements. Environmental variability challenges this coordination. For example, developing organisms encounter varying environmental temperatures that can strongly influence developmental rates. We hypothesized that the mechanics of morphogenesis would have to be finely adjusted to allow for normal morphogenesis across a wide range of developmental rates. We formulated our hypothesis as a simple model incorporating time-dependent application of force to a viscoelastic tissue. This model suggested that the capacity to maintain normal morphogenesis across a range of temperatures would depend on how both tissue viscoelasticity and the forces that drive deformation vary with temperature. To test this model we investigated how the mechanical behavior of embryonic tissue (Xenopus laevis) changed with temperature; we used a combination of micropipette aspiration to measure viscoelasticity, electrically induced contractions to measure cellular force generation, and confocal microscopy to measure endogenous contractility. Contrary to expectations, the viscoelasticity of the tissues and peak contractile tension proved invariant with temperature even as rates of force generation and gastrulation movements varied three-fold. Furthermore, the relative rates of different gastrulation movements varied with temperature: the speed of blastopore closure increased more slowly with temperature than the speed of the dorsal-to-ventral progression of involution. The changes in the relative rates of different tissue movements can be explained by the viscoelastic deformation model given observed viscoelastic properties, but only if morphogenetic forces increase slowly rather than all at once.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4002435?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT michelangelovondassow biomechanicsandthethermotoleranceofdevelopment
AT calliejohnsonmiller biomechanicsandthethermotoleranceofdevelopment
AT lanceadavidson biomechanicsandthethermotoleranceofdevelopment
_version_ 1716805101929103360