A Prospective Pilot Study on Use of Liquid Crystal Thermography to Detect Early Breast Cancer

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. While mammography is the standard for early detection in women older than 50 years of age, there is no standard for younger women. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to assess liquid crystal contact thermography, using the Braste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diana Hodorowicz-Zaniewska MD, Stefano Zurrida MD, Agnieszka Kotlarz MD, Piotr Kasprzak MD, Jan Skupień MD, PhD, Anna Ćwierz MD, Tadeusz J. Popiela MD, PhD, Adrian Maciejewski MD, Paweł Basta MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-04-01
Series:Integrative Cancer Therapies
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420915778
id doaj-a4bb932292424e36afe8da7b352fa45b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a4bb932292424e36afe8da7b352fa45b2020-11-25T02:50:30ZengSAGE PublishingIntegrative Cancer Therapies1534-73541552-695X2020-04-011910.1177/1534735420915778A Prospective Pilot Study on Use of Liquid Crystal Thermography to Detect Early Breast CancerDiana Hodorowicz-Zaniewska MD0Stefano Zurrida MD1Agnieszka Kotlarz MD2Piotr Kasprzak MD3Jan Skupień MD, PhD4Anna Ćwierz MD5Tadeusz J. Popiela MD, PhD6Adrian Maciejewski MD7Paweł Basta MD, PhD8University Hospital in Krakow, PolandUniversity of Milan, Milan, ItalyJagiellonian University, Krakow, PolandLower Silesia Oncology Center, Wroclaw, PolandJagiellonian University, Krakow, PolandLudwik Rydygier Memorial Specialized Hospital, Krakow, PolandUniversity Hospital in Krakow, PolandPoznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, PolandUniversity Hospital in Krakow, PolandBackground: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. While mammography is the standard for early detection in women older than 50 years of age, there is no standard for younger women. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to assess liquid crystal contact thermography, using the Braster device, as a means for the early detection of breast cancer. The device is intended to be used as a complementary tool to standard of care (sonography, mammography, etc). Patients and Methods: A total of 274 consecutive women presenting at Polish breast centers for prophylactic breast examination were enrolled to receive thermography; 19 were excluded for errors in thermographic image acquisition. The women were divided according to age (n = 135, <50 years; n = 120, ≥50 years). A control population was included (n = 40, <50 years; n = 23, ≥50 years). The primary endpoint, stratified by age group, was the C -statistic for discrimination between breast cancer and noncancer. Results: In women with abnormal breast ultrasound (n = 95, <50 years; n = 87, ≥50 years), the C -statistic was 0.85 and 0.75, respectively ( P = .20), for discrimination between breast cancer and noncancer. Sensitivity did not differ ( P = .79) between the younger (82%) and older women (78%), while specificity was lower in the older women (60% vs 87%, P = .025). The false-positive rate was similar in women with normal and abnormal breast ultrasound. Positive thermographic result in women with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4A on ultrasound increased the probability of breast cancer by over 2-fold. Conversely, a negative thermographic result decreased the probability of cancer more than 3-fold. Breast size and structure did not affect the thermography performance. No adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Thermography performed well in women <50 years of age, while its specificity in women ≥50 years was inadequate. These promising findings suggest that the Braster device deserves further investigation as a supporting tool for the early detection of breast cancer in women younger than 50 years of age.https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420915778
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diana Hodorowicz-Zaniewska MD
Stefano Zurrida MD
Agnieszka Kotlarz MD
Piotr Kasprzak MD
Jan Skupień MD, PhD
Anna Ćwierz MD
Tadeusz J. Popiela MD, PhD
Adrian Maciejewski MD
Paweł Basta MD, PhD
spellingShingle Diana Hodorowicz-Zaniewska MD
Stefano Zurrida MD
Agnieszka Kotlarz MD
Piotr Kasprzak MD
Jan Skupień MD, PhD
Anna Ćwierz MD
Tadeusz J. Popiela MD, PhD
Adrian Maciejewski MD
Paweł Basta MD, PhD
A Prospective Pilot Study on Use of Liquid Crystal Thermography to Detect Early Breast Cancer
Integrative Cancer Therapies
author_facet Diana Hodorowicz-Zaniewska MD
Stefano Zurrida MD
Agnieszka Kotlarz MD
Piotr Kasprzak MD
Jan Skupień MD, PhD
Anna Ćwierz MD
Tadeusz J. Popiela MD, PhD
Adrian Maciejewski MD
Paweł Basta MD, PhD
author_sort Diana Hodorowicz-Zaniewska MD
title A Prospective Pilot Study on Use of Liquid Crystal Thermography to Detect Early Breast Cancer
title_short A Prospective Pilot Study on Use of Liquid Crystal Thermography to Detect Early Breast Cancer
title_full A Prospective Pilot Study on Use of Liquid Crystal Thermography to Detect Early Breast Cancer
title_fullStr A Prospective Pilot Study on Use of Liquid Crystal Thermography to Detect Early Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Pilot Study on Use of Liquid Crystal Thermography to Detect Early Breast Cancer
title_sort prospective pilot study on use of liquid crystal thermography to detect early breast cancer
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Integrative Cancer Therapies
issn 1534-7354
1552-695X
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. While mammography is the standard for early detection in women older than 50 years of age, there is no standard for younger women. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to assess liquid crystal contact thermography, using the Braster device, as a means for the early detection of breast cancer. The device is intended to be used as a complementary tool to standard of care (sonography, mammography, etc). Patients and Methods: A total of 274 consecutive women presenting at Polish breast centers for prophylactic breast examination were enrolled to receive thermography; 19 were excluded for errors in thermographic image acquisition. The women were divided according to age (n = 135, <50 years; n = 120, ≥50 years). A control population was included (n = 40, <50 years; n = 23, ≥50 years). The primary endpoint, stratified by age group, was the C -statistic for discrimination between breast cancer and noncancer. Results: In women with abnormal breast ultrasound (n = 95, <50 years; n = 87, ≥50 years), the C -statistic was 0.85 and 0.75, respectively ( P = .20), for discrimination between breast cancer and noncancer. Sensitivity did not differ ( P = .79) between the younger (82%) and older women (78%), while specificity was lower in the older women (60% vs 87%, P = .025). The false-positive rate was similar in women with normal and abnormal breast ultrasound. Positive thermographic result in women with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 4A on ultrasound increased the probability of breast cancer by over 2-fold. Conversely, a negative thermographic result decreased the probability of cancer more than 3-fold. Breast size and structure did not affect the thermography performance. No adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Thermography performed well in women <50 years of age, while its specificity in women ≥50 years was inadequate. These promising findings suggest that the Braster device deserves further investigation as a supporting tool for the early detection of breast cancer in women younger than 50 years of age.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735420915778
work_keys_str_mv AT dianahodorowiczzaniewskamd aprospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT stefanozurridamd aprospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT agnieszkakotlarzmd aprospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT piotrkasprzakmd aprospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT janskupienmdphd aprospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT annacwierzmd aprospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT tadeuszjpopielamdphd aprospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT adrianmaciejewskimd aprospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT pawełbastamdphd aprospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT dianahodorowiczzaniewskamd prospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT stefanozurridamd prospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT agnieszkakotlarzmd prospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT piotrkasprzakmd prospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT janskupienmdphd prospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT annacwierzmd prospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT tadeuszjpopielamdphd prospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT adrianmaciejewskimd prospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
AT pawełbastamdphd prospectivepilotstudyonuseofliquidcrystalthermographytodetectearlybreastcancer
_version_ 1724738159981363200