Standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: A systematic review

Introduction To systematically review the evidence regarding the effect of standardized packaging on illicit tobacco use. Material and Methods Data sources were EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, PsycInfo, Medline, and the British Library catalogue, from 01/01/1987 to 28/11/2016. Reference lists of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine Haighton, Catherine Taylor, Ailsa Rutter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Publishing 2017-05-01
Series:Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalssystem.com/tpc/Standardised-packaging-and-illicit-tobacco-use-A-systematic-review,70277,0,2.html
id doaj-a6e011a9b4a84d0d9d5e46d7752bda8c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a6e011a9b4a84d0d9d5e46d7752bda8c2020-11-25T00:04:05ZengEuropean PublishingTobacco Prevention and Cessation2459-30872017-05-013May10.18332/tpc/7027770277Standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: A systematic reviewCatherine Haighton0Catherine Taylor1Ailsa Rutter2Northumbria University, UKFresh Smoke Free North EastFresh Smoke Free North EastIntroduction To systematically review the evidence regarding the effect of standardized packaging on illicit tobacco use. Material and Methods Data sources were EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, PsycInfo, Medline, and the British Library catalogue, from 01/01/1987 to 28/11/2016. Reference lists of included studies were hand searched for additional papers. Search strategies were based on the terms ‘tobacco’, ‘packaging’ and ‘illicit’. The search was restricted to English language references. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts for empirical studies that addressed the topic of standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use. This resulted in 153 full text papers retrieved for screening. Following exclusions, ten papers were included in the review. Two reviewers’ extracted data using piloted standardized data extraction forms. Studies were assessed for quality and relevance using CASP. Results There was little homogeneity between included studies, so a narrative synthesis was employed. Of the relevant studies five reported smokers did not intend to or actually purchase further illicit tobacco following standardized packaging, although one suggested a small number of responders to online news felt smokers would be more inclined to purchase illicit tobacco, following standardized packaging. Two studies reported retailers did not intend to or actually increase sales of illicit tobacco following standardized packaging. Finally, two studies reported industry data on illicit tobacco were of poor quality and not supported by independent data. Conclusions There were few studies examining tobacco standardized packaging and illicit trade, however those available showed no evidence that standardized packaging could lead to increases in illicit trade.http://www.journalssystem.com/tpc/Standardised-packaging-and-illicit-tobacco-use-A-systematic-review,70277,0,2.htmlplain packagingillicit tradeTobacco
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Catherine Haighton
Catherine Taylor
Ailsa Rutter
spellingShingle Catherine Haighton
Catherine Taylor
Ailsa Rutter
Standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: A systematic review
Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
plain packaging
illicit trade
Tobacco
author_facet Catherine Haighton
Catherine Taylor
Ailsa Rutter
author_sort Catherine Haighton
title Standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: A systematic review
title_short Standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: A systematic review
title_full Standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: A systematic review
title_fullStr Standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: A systematic review
title_sort standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use: a systematic review
publisher European Publishing
series Tobacco Prevention and Cessation
issn 2459-3087
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Introduction To systematically review the evidence regarding the effect of standardized packaging on illicit tobacco use. Material and Methods Data sources were EMBASE, Web of Knowledge, Scopus, PsycInfo, Medline, and the British Library catalogue, from 01/01/1987 to 28/11/2016. Reference lists of included studies were hand searched for additional papers. Search strategies were based on the terms ‘tobacco’, ‘packaging’ and ‘illicit’. The search was restricted to English language references. Two reviewers screened titles and abstracts for empirical studies that addressed the topic of standardized packaging and illicit tobacco use. This resulted in 153 full text papers retrieved for screening. Following exclusions, ten papers were included in the review. Two reviewers’ extracted data using piloted standardized data extraction forms. Studies were assessed for quality and relevance using CASP. Results There was little homogeneity between included studies, so a narrative synthesis was employed. Of the relevant studies five reported smokers did not intend to or actually purchase further illicit tobacco following standardized packaging, although one suggested a small number of responders to online news felt smokers would be more inclined to purchase illicit tobacco, following standardized packaging. Two studies reported retailers did not intend to or actually increase sales of illicit tobacco following standardized packaging. Finally, two studies reported industry data on illicit tobacco were of poor quality and not supported by independent data. Conclusions There were few studies examining tobacco standardized packaging and illicit trade, however those available showed no evidence that standardized packaging could lead to increases in illicit trade.
topic plain packaging
illicit trade
Tobacco
url http://www.journalssystem.com/tpc/Standardised-packaging-and-illicit-tobacco-use-A-systematic-review,70277,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT catherinehaighton standardizedpackagingandillicittobaccouseasystematicreview
AT catherinetaylor standardizedpackagingandillicittobaccouseasystematicreview
AT ailsarutter standardizedpackagingandillicittobaccouseasystematicreview
_version_ 1725431137519534080