Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations

OBJECTIVES: Cardiology referral is common for patients admitted for non-cardiac diseases. Recommendations from cardiologists may involve complex and aggressive treatments that could be ignored or denied by other physicians. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who were g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André C. Marques, Daniela Calderaro, Pai C. Yu, Danielle M. Gualandro, Gabriel A.L. Carmo, Fernanda R. Azevedo, Adriana F. Pastana, Eneas M.O. Lima, Maristela Monachini, Bruno Caramelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2014-12-01
Series:Clinics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322014001000666&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-a8fb51882e8a4fd382eaed6b0d586e6d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-a8fb51882e8a4fd382eaed6b0d586e6d2020-11-24T20:58:10ZengFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics1980-53222014-12-01691066667110.6061/clinics/2014(10)03S1807-59322014001000666Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendationsAndré C. MarquesDaniela CalderaroPai C. YuDanielle M. GualandroGabriel A.L. CarmoFernanda R. AzevedoAdriana F. PastanaEneas M.O. LimaMaristela MonachiniBruno CaramelliOBJECTIVES: Cardiology referral is common for patients admitted for non-cardiac diseases. Recommendations from cardiologists may involve complex and aggressive treatments that could be ignored or denied by other physicians. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who were given recommendations during cardiology referrals and to examine the clinical outcomes of patients who did not follow the recommendations. METHODS: We enrolled 589 consecutive patients who received in-hospital cardiology consultations. Data on recommendations, implementation of suggestions and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Regarding adherence of the referring service to the recommendations, 77% of patients were classified in the adherence group and 23% were classified in the non-adherence group. Membership in the non-adherence group (p<0.001; odds ratio: 10.25; 95% CI: 4.45-23.62) and advanced age (p = 0.017; OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07) were associated with unfavorable outcomes. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of adherence to recommendations: follow-up notes in the medical chart (p<0.001; OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.48-4.01); verbal reinforcement (p = 0.001; OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.23-2.81); a small number of recommendation (p = 0.001; OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80-0.94); and a younger patient age (p = 0.002; OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Poor adherence to cardiology referral recommendations was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. Follow-up notes in the medical chart, verbal reinforcement, a limited number of recommendations and a patient age were associated with greater adherence to recommendations.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322014001000666&lng=en&tlng=enReferralConsultationAudit
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author André C. Marques
Daniela Calderaro
Pai C. Yu
Danielle M. Gualandro
Gabriel A.L. Carmo
Fernanda R. Azevedo
Adriana F. Pastana
Eneas M.O. Lima
Maristela Monachini
Bruno Caramelli
spellingShingle André C. Marques
Daniela Calderaro
Pai C. Yu
Danielle M. Gualandro
Gabriel A.L. Carmo
Fernanda R. Azevedo
Adriana F. Pastana
Eneas M.O. Lima
Maristela Monachini
Bruno Caramelli
Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations
Clinics
Referral
Consultation
Audit
author_facet André C. Marques
Daniela Calderaro
Pai C. Yu
Danielle M. Gualandro
Gabriel A.L. Carmo
Fernanda R. Azevedo
Adriana F. Pastana
Eneas M.O. Lima
Maristela Monachini
Bruno Caramelli
author_sort André C. Marques
title Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations
title_short Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations
title_full Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations
title_fullStr Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations
title_sort impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
series Clinics
issn 1980-5322
publishDate 2014-12-01
description OBJECTIVES: Cardiology referral is common for patients admitted for non-cardiac diseases. Recommendations from cardiologists may involve complex and aggressive treatments that could be ignored or denied by other physicians. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who were given recommendations during cardiology referrals and to examine the clinical outcomes of patients who did not follow the recommendations. METHODS: We enrolled 589 consecutive patients who received in-hospital cardiology consultations. Data on recommendations, implementation of suggestions and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Regarding adherence of the referring service to the recommendations, 77% of patients were classified in the adherence group and 23% were classified in the non-adherence group. Membership in the non-adherence group (p<0.001; odds ratio: 10.25; 95% CI: 4.45-23.62) and advanced age (p = 0.017; OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07) were associated with unfavorable outcomes. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of adherence to recommendations: follow-up notes in the medical chart (p<0.001; OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.48-4.01); verbal reinforcement (p = 0.001; OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.23-2.81); a small number of recommendation (p = 0.001; OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80-0.94); and a younger patient age (p = 0.002; OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Poor adherence to cardiology referral recommendations was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. Follow-up notes in the medical chart, verbal reinforcement, a limited number of recommendations and a patient age were associated with greater adherence to recommendations.
topic Referral
Consultation
Audit
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322014001000666&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT andrecmarques impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
AT danielacalderaro impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
AT paicyu impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
AT daniellemgualandro impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
AT gabrielalcarmo impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
AT fernandarazevedo impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
AT adrianafpastana impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
AT eneasmolima impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
AT maristelamonachini impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
AT brunocaramelli impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations
_version_ 1716786384414441472