Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations
OBJECTIVES: Cardiology referral is common for patients admitted for non-cardiac diseases. Recommendations from cardiologists may involve complex and aggressive treatments that could be ignored or denied by other physicians. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who were g...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Clinics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322014001000666&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-a8fb51882e8a4fd382eaed6b0d586e6d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-a8fb51882e8a4fd382eaed6b0d586e6d2020-11-24T20:58:10ZengFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics1980-53222014-12-01691066667110.6061/clinics/2014(10)03S1807-59322014001000666Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendationsAndré C. MarquesDaniela CalderaroPai C. YuDanielle M. GualandroGabriel A.L. CarmoFernanda R. AzevedoAdriana F. PastanaEneas M.O. LimaMaristela MonachiniBruno CaramelliOBJECTIVES: Cardiology referral is common for patients admitted for non-cardiac diseases. Recommendations from cardiologists may involve complex and aggressive treatments that could be ignored or denied by other physicians. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who were given recommendations during cardiology referrals and to examine the clinical outcomes of patients who did not follow the recommendations. METHODS: We enrolled 589 consecutive patients who received in-hospital cardiology consultations. Data on recommendations, implementation of suggestions and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Regarding adherence of the referring service to the recommendations, 77% of patients were classified in the adherence group and 23% were classified in the non-adherence group. Membership in the non-adherence group (p<0.001; odds ratio: 10.25; 95% CI: 4.45-23.62) and advanced age (p = 0.017; OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07) were associated with unfavorable outcomes. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of adherence to recommendations: follow-up notes in the medical chart (p<0.001; OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.48-4.01); verbal reinforcement (p = 0.001; OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.23-2.81); a small number of recommendation (p = 0.001; OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80-0.94); and a younger patient age (p = 0.002; OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Poor adherence to cardiology referral recommendations was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. Follow-up notes in the medical chart, verbal reinforcement, a limited number of recommendations and a patient age were associated with greater adherence to recommendations.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322014001000666&lng=en&tlng=enReferralConsultationAudit |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
André C. Marques Daniela Calderaro Pai C. Yu Danielle M. Gualandro Gabriel A.L. Carmo Fernanda R. Azevedo Adriana F. Pastana Eneas M.O. Lima Maristela Monachini Bruno Caramelli |
spellingShingle |
André C. Marques Daniela Calderaro Pai C. Yu Danielle M. Gualandro Gabriel A.L. Carmo Fernanda R. Azevedo Adriana F. Pastana Eneas M.O. Lima Maristela Monachini Bruno Caramelli Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations Clinics Referral Consultation Audit |
author_facet |
André C. Marques Daniela Calderaro Pai C. Yu Danielle M. Gualandro Gabriel A.L. Carmo Fernanda R. Azevedo Adriana F. Pastana Eneas M.O. Lima Maristela Monachini Bruno Caramelli |
author_sort |
André C. Marques |
title |
Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations |
title_short |
Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations |
title_full |
Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations |
title_fullStr |
Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations |
title_sort |
impact of cardiology referral: clinical outcomes and factors associated with physicians' adherence to recommendations |
publisher |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
series |
Clinics |
issn |
1980-5322 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
OBJECTIVES: Cardiology referral is common for patients admitted for non-cardiac diseases. Recommendations from cardiologists may involve complex and aggressive treatments that could be ignored or denied by other physicians. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients who were given recommendations during cardiology referrals and to examine the clinical outcomes of patients who did not follow the recommendations. METHODS: We enrolled 589 consecutive patients who received in-hospital cardiology consultations. Data on recommendations, implementation of suggestions and outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Regarding adherence of the referring service to the recommendations, 77% of patients were classified in the adherence group and 23% were classified in the non-adherence group. Membership in the non-adherence group (p<0.001; odds ratio: 10.25; 95% CI: 4.45-23.62) and advanced age (p = 0.017; OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01-1.07) were associated with unfavorable outcomes. Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictors of adherence to recommendations: follow-up notes in the medical chart (p<0.001; OR: 2.43; 95% CI: 1.48-4.01); verbal reinforcement (p = 0.001; OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.23-2.81); a small number of recommendation (p = 0.001; OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.80-0.94); and a younger patient age (p = 0.002; OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.96-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Poor adherence to cardiology referral recommendations was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes. Follow-up notes in the medical chart, verbal reinforcement, a limited number of recommendations and a patient age were associated with greater adherence to recommendations. |
topic |
Referral Consultation Audit |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322014001000666&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andrecmarques impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations AT danielacalderaro impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations AT paicyu impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations AT daniellemgualandro impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations AT gabrielalcarmo impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations AT fernandarazevedo impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations AT adrianafpastana impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations AT eneasmolima impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations AT maristelamonachini impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations AT brunocaramelli impactofcardiologyreferralclinicaloutcomesandfactorsassociatedwithphysiciansadherencetorecommendations |
_version_ |
1716786384414441472 |