cSPider - Evaluation of a Free and Open-Source Automated Tool to Analyze Corticomotor Silent Period.

BACKGROUND:The corticomotor silent period (CSP), as assessed noninvasively by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the primary motor cortex, has been found to reflect intracortical inhibitory mechanisms. Analysis of CSP is mostly conducted manually. However, this approach is time-consuming, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Skadi Wilke, Dennis Groenveld, Ulrike Grittner, Jonathan List, Agnes Flöel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4889140?pdf=render
id doaj-aaca298a3f3b49f2b294f1bf1fcdce79
record_format Article
spelling doaj-aaca298a3f3b49f2b294f1bf1fcdce792020-11-24T21:09:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01116e015606610.1371/journal.pone.0156066cSPider - Evaluation of a Free and Open-Source Automated Tool to Analyze Corticomotor Silent Period.Skadi WilkeDennis GroenveldUlrike GrittnerJonathan ListAgnes FlöelBACKGROUND:The corticomotor silent period (CSP), as assessed noninvasively by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the primary motor cortex, has been found to reflect intracortical inhibitory mechanisms. Analysis of CSP is mostly conducted manually. However, this approach is time-consuming, and comparison of results from different laboratories may be compromised by inter-rater variability in analysis. No open source program for automated analysis is currently available. METHODS/RESULTS:Here, we describe cross-validation with the manual analysis of an in-house written automated tool to assess CSP (cSPider). Results from automated routine were compared with results of the manual evaluation. We found high inter-method reliability between automated and manual analysis (p<0.001), and significantly reduced time for CSP analysis (median = 10.3 sec for automated analysis of 10 CSPs vs. median = 270 sec for manual analysis of 10 CSPs). cSPider can be downloaded free of charge. CONCLUSION:cSPider allows automated analysis of CSP in a reliable and time-efficient manner. Use of this open-source tool may help to improve comparison of data from different laboratories.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4889140?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Skadi Wilke
Dennis Groenveld
Ulrike Grittner
Jonathan List
Agnes Flöel
spellingShingle Skadi Wilke
Dennis Groenveld
Ulrike Grittner
Jonathan List
Agnes Flöel
cSPider - Evaluation of a Free and Open-Source Automated Tool to Analyze Corticomotor Silent Period.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Skadi Wilke
Dennis Groenveld
Ulrike Grittner
Jonathan List
Agnes Flöel
author_sort Skadi Wilke
title cSPider - Evaluation of a Free and Open-Source Automated Tool to Analyze Corticomotor Silent Period.
title_short cSPider - Evaluation of a Free and Open-Source Automated Tool to Analyze Corticomotor Silent Period.
title_full cSPider - Evaluation of a Free and Open-Source Automated Tool to Analyze Corticomotor Silent Period.
title_fullStr cSPider - Evaluation of a Free and Open-Source Automated Tool to Analyze Corticomotor Silent Period.
title_full_unstemmed cSPider - Evaluation of a Free and Open-Source Automated Tool to Analyze Corticomotor Silent Period.
title_sort cspider - evaluation of a free and open-source automated tool to analyze corticomotor silent period.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description BACKGROUND:The corticomotor silent period (CSP), as assessed noninvasively by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the primary motor cortex, has been found to reflect intracortical inhibitory mechanisms. Analysis of CSP is mostly conducted manually. However, this approach is time-consuming, and comparison of results from different laboratories may be compromised by inter-rater variability in analysis. No open source program for automated analysis is currently available. METHODS/RESULTS:Here, we describe cross-validation with the manual analysis of an in-house written automated tool to assess CSP (cSPider). Results from automated routine were compared with results of the manual evaluation. We found high inter-method reliability between automated and manual analysis (p<0.001), and significantly reduced time for CSP analysis (median = 10.3 sec for automated analysis of 10 CSPs vs. median = 270 sec for manual analysis of 10 CSPs). cSPider can be downloaded free of charge. CONCLUSION:cSPider allows automated analysis of CSP in a reliable and time-efficient manner. Use of this open-source tool may help to improve comparison of data from different laboratories.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4889140?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT skadiwilke cspiderevaluationofafreeandopensourceautomatedtooltoanalyzecorticomotorsilentperiod
AT dennisgroenveld cspiderevaluationofafreeandopensourceautomatedtooltoanalyzecorticomotorsilentperiod
AT ulrikegrittner cspiderevaluationofafreeandopensourceautomatedtooltoanalyzecorticomotorsilentperiod
AT jonathanlist cspiderevaluationofafreeandopensourceautomatedtooltoanalyzecorticomotorsilentperiod
AT agnesfloel cspiderevaluationofafreeandopensourceautomatedtooltoanalyzecorticomotorsilentperiod
_version_ 1716757115768406016