Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

IntroductionCurrent evidence supporting the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as a first-line treatment option for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is limited. We plan to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the performance of EUS-BD and endosco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zheng Jin, Yaping Wei, Huapeng Lin, Haitao Huang, Wen Lv, Xiaofeng Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2019-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/6/e028156.full
id doaj-b65d8c7ea4be4fb69bcf27ba6752598e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b65d8c7ea4be4fb69bcf27ba6752598e2021-07-03T12:36:48ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552019-06-019610.1136/bmjopen-2018-028156Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsZheng Jin0Yaping Wei1Huapeng Lin2Haitao Huang3Wen Lv4Xiaofeng Zhang5Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China1 Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Management, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaAffiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaAffiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaAffiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, ChinaIntroductionCurrent evidence supporting the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as a first-line treatment option for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is limited. We plan to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the performance of EUS-BD and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage (ERCP-BD) as primary palliation of MBO.Methods and analysisRandomised controlled trials evaluating EUS-BD versus ERCP-BD in primary drainage of MBO will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar, from database inception to 31 October 2018. Data on study design, participant characteristics, intervention details and outcomes will be extracted. Primary outcomes to be assessed are technical and clinical success. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, stent patency, stent dysfunction, reinterventions, procedure duration and overall survival. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan V.5.3 statistical software. Data will be combined with a random effect model. The results will be presented as a risk ratio for dichotomous data, weighted mean difference for continuous data and HR for time-to-event data. Publication bias will be visualised using funnel plots.Ethics and disseminationThis study will not use primary data, and therefore, formal ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and committee conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018117040https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/6/e028156.full
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zheng Jin
Yaping Wei
Huapeng Lin
Haitao Huang
Wen Lv
Xiaofeng Zhang
spellingShingle Zheng Jin
Yaping Wei
Huapeng Lin
Haitao Huang
Wen Lv
Xiaofeng Zhang
Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
BMJ Open
author_facet Zheng Jin
Yaping Wei
Huapeng Lin
Haitao Huang
Wen Lv
Xiaofeng Zhang
author_sort Zheng Jin
title Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_short Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
title_sort endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage for primary decompression of malignant biliary obstruction: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
series BMJ Open
issn 2044-6055
publishDate 2019-06-01
description IntroductionCurrent evidence supporting the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) as a first-line treatment option for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is limited. We plan to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the performance of EUS-BD and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage (ERCP-BD) as primary palliation of MBO.Methods and analysisRandomised controlled trials evaluating EUS-BD versus ERCP-BD in primary drainage of MBO will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar, from database inception to 31 October 2018. Data on study design, participant characteristics, intervention details and outcomes will be extracted. Primary outcomes to be assessed are technical and clinical success. Secondary outcomes include adverse events, stent patency, stent dysfunction, reinterventions, procedure duration and overall survival. Study quality will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analysis will be performed using RevMan V.5.3 statistical software. Data will be combined with a random effect model. The results will be presented as a risk ratio for dichotomous data, weighted mean difference for continuous data and HR for time-to-event data. Publication bias will be visualised using funnel plots.Ethics and disseminationThis study will not use primary data, and therefore, formal ethical approval is not required. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and committee conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018117040
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/6/e028156.full
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengjin endoscopicultrasoundversusendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyguidedbiliarydrainageforprimarydecompressionofmalignantbiliaryobstructionprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT yapingwei endoscopicultrasoundversusendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyguidedbiliarydrainageforprimarydecompressionofmalignantbiliaryobstructionprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT huapenglin endoscopicultrasoundversusendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyguidedbiliarydrainageforprimarydecompressionofmalignantbiliaryobstructionprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT haitaohuang endoscopicultrasoundversusendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyguidedbiliarydrainageforprimarydecompressionofmalignantbiliaryobstructionprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT wenlv endoscopicultrasoundversusendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyguidedbiliarydrainageforprimarydecompressionofmalignantbiliaryobstructionprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT xiaofengzhang endoscopicultrasoundversusendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyguidedbiliarydrainageforprimarydecompressionofmalignantbiliaryobstructionprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomisedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1721320994288697344