Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data

Background: Participatory approaches to qualitative research practice constantly change in response to evolving research environments. Researchers are increasingly encouraged to undertake secondary analysis of qualitative data, despite epistemological and ethical challenges. Interpretive focus group...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michelle Redman-MacLaren, Jane Mills, Rachael Tommbe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2014-08-01
Series:Global Health Action
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/download/25214/pdf_1
id doaj-b870e63e3deb4a6e9192b31e38397a91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b870e63e3deb4a6e9192b31e38397a912020-11-24T22:42:41ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Health Action1654-98802014-08-01701610.3402/gha.v7.2521425214Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative dataMichelle Redman-MacLaren0Jane Mills1Rachael Tommbe2 College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia School of Health Science, Pacific Adventist University, Port Moresby, Papua New GuineaBackground: Participatory approaches to qualitative research practice constantly change in response to evolving research environments. Researchers are increasingly encouraged to undertake secondary analysis of qualitative data, despite epistemological and ethical challenges. Interpretive focus groups can be described as a more participative method for groups to analyse qualitative data. Objective: To facilitate interpretive focus groups with women in Papua New Guinea to extend analysis of existing qualitative data and co-create new primary data. The purpose of this was to inform a transformational grounded theory and subsequent health promoting action. Design: A two-step approach was used in a grounded theory study about how women experience male circumcision in Papua New Guinea. Participants analysed portions or ‘chunks’ of existing qualitative data in story circles and built upon this analysis by using the visual research method of storyboarding. Results: New understandings of the data were evoked when women in interpretive focus groups analysed the data ‘chunks’. Interpretive focus groups encouraged women to share their personal experiences about male circumcision. The visual method of storyboarding enabled women to draw pictures to represent their experiences. This provided an additional focus for whole-of-group discussions about the research topic. Conclusions: Interpretive focus groups offer opportunity to enhance trustworthiness of findings when researchers undertake secondary analysis of qualitative data. The co-analysis of existing data and co-generation of new data between research participants and researchers informed an emergent transformational grounded theory and subsequent health promoting action.http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/download/25214/pdf_1interpretive focus groupssecondary analysisdecolonizing methodologiesqualitative researchPapua New Guinea
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michelle Redman-MacLaren
Jane Mills
Rachael Tommbe
spellingShingle Michelle Redman-MacLaren
Jane Mills
Rachael Tommbe
Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data
Global Health Action
interpretive focus groups
secondary analysis
decolonizing methodologies
qualitative research
Papua New Guinea
author_facet Michelle Redman-MacLaren
Jane Mills
Rachael Tommbe
author_sort Michelle Redman-MacLaren
title Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data
title_short Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data
title_full Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data
title_fullStr Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data
title_full_unstemmed Interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data
title_sort interpretive focus groups: a participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Global Health Action
issn 1654-9880
publishDate 2014-08-01
description Background: Participatory approaches to qualitative research practice constantly change in response to evolving research environments. Researchers are increasingly encouraged to undertake secondary analysis of qualitative data, despite epistemological and ethical challenges. Interpretive focus groups can be described as a more participative method for groups to analyse qualitative data. Objective: To facilitate interpretive focus groups with women in Papua New Guinea to extend analysis of existing qualitative data and co-create new primary data. The purpose of this was to inform a transformational grounded theory and subsequent health promoting action. Design: A two-step approach was used in a grounded theory study about how women experience male circumcision in Papua New Guinea. Participants analysed portions or ‘chunks’ of existing qualitative data in story circles and built upon this analysis by using the visual research method of storyboarding. Results: New understandings of the data were evoked when women in interpretive focus groups analysed the data ‘chunks’. Interpretive focus groups encouraged women to share their personal experiences about male circumcision. The visual method of storyboarding enabled women to draw pictures to represent their experiences. This provided an additional focus for whole-of-group discussions about the research topic. Conclusions: Interpretive focus groups offer opportunity to enhance trustworthiness of findings when researchers undertake secondary analysis of qualitative data. The co-analysis of existing data and co-generation of new data between research participants and researchers informed an emergent transformational grounded theory and subsequent health promoting action.
topic interpretive focus groups
secondary analysis
decolonizing methodologies
qualitative research
Papua New Guinea
url http://www.globalhealthaction.net/index.php/gha/article/download/25214/pdf_1
work_keys_str_mv AT michelleredmanmaclaren interpretivefocusgroupsaparticipatorymethodforinterpretingandextendingsecondaryanalysisofqualitativedata
AT janemills interpretivefocusgroupsaparticipatorymethodforinterpretingandextendingsecondaryanalysisofqualitativedata
AT rachaeltommbe interpretivefocusgroupsaparticipatorymethodforinterpretingandextendingsecondaryanalysisofqualitativedata
_version_ 1725698986714595328