Fathering Agency Staff Members’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence Perpetration

Purpose: To describe the perspectives of fathering staff regarding domestic violence (DV) perpetration. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey of 85 fathering staff members was conducted to identify behaviors and barriers regarding inquiry about DV perpetration. Results: Almost half (47.1%)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter F. Cronholm MD, MSCE, Willie Ellison MSW, LSW, Silvana Mazzella BSW, MA GUS, Marcy Witherspoon MSW, LSW, Joy Bowman Lim MSW, LSW, Tony Lapp LCSW, Gilbert Coleman BBA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-01-01
Series:American Journal of Men's Health
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988309360568
id doaj-b88a63bffef84c3f90a70de5c27e4454
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b88a63bffef84c3f90a70de5c27e44542020-11-25T01:20:38ZengSAGE PublishingAmerican Journal of Men's Health1557-98832011-01-01510.1177/1557988309360568Fathering Agency Staff Members’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence PerpetrationPeter F. Cronholm MD, MSCEWillie Ellison MSW, LSWSilvana Mazzella BSW, MA GUSMarcy Witherspoon MSW, LSWJoy Bowman Lim MSW, LSWTony Lapp LCSWGilbert Coleman BBAPurpose: To describe the perspectives of fathering staff regarding domestic violence (DV) perpetration. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey of 85 fathering staff members was conducted to identify behaviors and barriers regarding inquiry about DV perpetration. Results: Almost half (47.1%) of the surveyed staff reported never having identified DV perpetration. Routine inquiry was less likely if staff perceived low prevalence rates among their clients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.11, p = .001), did not have standard ways of asking (OR = 0.11, p < .001), or if they had never identified family violence before (OR = 0.07, p < .001). Increased years as a provider (OR = 6.62, p = .001) and DV training (OR = 7.29, p = .003) increased rates of DV perpetration inquiry. Conclusions: Staff of fathering agencies do not routinely screen for DV perpetration likely due to the interplay between individual and agency-level barriers. Appropriate training interventions can address identified barriers.https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988309360568
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter F. Cronholm MD, MSCE
Willie Ellison MSW, LSW
Silvana Mazzella BSW, MA GUS
Marcy Witherspoon MSW, LSW
Joy Bowman Lim MSW, LSW
Tony Lapp LCSW
Gilbert Coleman BBA
spellingShingle Peter F. Cronholm MD, MSCE
Willie Ellison MSW, LSW
Silvana Mazzella BSW, MA GUS
Marcy Witherspoon MSW, LSW
Joy Bowman Lim MSW, LSW
Tony Lapp LCSW
Gilbert Coleman BBA
Fathering Agency Staff Members’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence Perpetration
American Journal of Men's Health
author_facet Peter F. Cronholm MD, MSCE
Willie Ellison MSW, LSW
Silvana Mazzella BSW, MA GUS
Marcy Witherspoon MSW, LSW
Joy Bowman Lim MSW, LSW
Tony Lapp LCSW
Gilbert Coleman BBA
author_sort Peter F. Cronholm MD, MSCE
title Fathering Agency Staff Members’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence Perpetration
title_short Fathering Agency Staff Members’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence Perpetration
title_full Fathering Agency Staff Members’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence Perpetration
title_fullStr Fathering Agency Staff Members’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence Perpetration
title_full_unstemmed Fathering Agency Staff Members’ Perspectives on Domestic Violence Perpetration
title_sort fathering agency staff members’ perspectives on domestic violence perpetration
publisher SAGE Publishing
series American Journal of Men's Health
issn 1557-9883
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Purpose: To describe the perspectives of fathering staff regarding domestic violence (DV) perpetration. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey of 85 fathering staff members was conducted to identify behaviors and barriers regarding inquiry about DV perpetration. Results: Almost half (47.1%) of the surveyed staff reported never having identified DV perpetration. Routine inquiry was less likely if staff perceived low prevalence rates among their clients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.11, p = .001), did not have standard ways of asking (OR = 0.11, p < .001), or if they had never identified family violence before (OR = 0.07, p < .001). Increased years as a provider (OR = 6.62, p = .001) and DV training (OR = 7.29, p = .003) increased rates of DV perpetration inquiry. Conclusions: Staff of fathering agencies do not routinely screen for DV perpetration likely due to the interplay between individual and agency-level barriers. Appropriate training interventions can address identified barriers.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988309360568
work_keys_str_mv AT peterfcronholmmdmsce fatheringagencystaffmembersperspectivesondomesticviolenceperpetration
AT willieellisonmswlsw fatheringagencystaffmembersperspectivesondomesticviolenceperpetration
AT silvanamazzellabswmagus fatheringagencystaffmembersperspectivesondomesticviolenceperpetration
AT marcywitherspoonmswlsw fatheringagencystaffmembersperspectivesondomesticviolenceperpetration
AT joybowmanlimmswlsw fatheringagencystaffmembersperspectivesondomesticviolenceperpetration
AT tonylapplcsw fatheringagencystaffmembersperspectivesondomesticviolenceperpetration
AT gilbertcolemanbba fatheringagencystaffmembersperspectivesondomesticviolenceperpetration
_version_ 1725132847033876480