From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation

Participation in spatial planning has been studied extensively in the past decades, but many cases of spatial planning have nonetheless seen a gap between decision makers and local residents. This is why participation in spatial planning has become a classic research question of many urban planning–...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aidan Cerar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Urbanistični inštitut RS 2014-06-01
Series:Urbani Izziv
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-002.pdf
id doaj-b913683d33164b5bb5bd5e13d8714420
record_format Article
spelling doaj-b913683d33164b5bb5bd5e13d87144202021-10-02T06:47:45ZengUrbanistični inštitut RSUrbani Izziv0353-64831855-83992014-06-012519310610.5379/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-002From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participationAidan Cerar0Regional Development Agency of the Ljubljana Urban Region, Ljubljana, SloveniaParticipation in spatial planning has been studied extensively in the past decades, but many cases of spatial planning have nonetheless seen a gap between decision makers and local residents. This is why participation in spatial planning has become a classic research question of many urban planning–related sciences. The greatest focus has been on cases of participation that present some kind of reaction to plans or actions, whereas far less attention has been given to cases of participation based on initiatives and the search for new content for underused or decaying areas. Such cases usually start with initiatives for the new use of particular places and often result in physical changes to these places. This article defines various types of local initiatives, and it especially studies the distinction between reactionary and contributive local initiatives and relates them to the notion of community. The article is based on an analysis of two particular cases. The differences in these two cases represent a foundation for the article’s conclusions, which emphasises the potentials for stimulating contributive participation. The conclusion includes recommendations for the spatial planning system to become more open to participation in terms of revitalising underused spaces because such space has been increasing during the economic downturn. The complex and inefficient system of spatial planning is turning away many creative initiatives.http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-002.pdfparticipationlocal initiativesurban regenerationcommunity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aidan Cerar
spellingShingle Aidan Cerar
From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation
Urbani Izziv
participation
local initiatives
urban regeneration
community
author_facet Aidan Cerar
author_sort Aidan Cerar
title From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation
title_short From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation
title_full From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation
title_fullStr From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation
title_full_unstemmed From reaction to initiative: Potentials of contributive participation
title_sort from reaction to initiative: potentials of contributive participation
publisher Urbanistični inštitut RS
series Urbani Izziv
issn 0353-6483
1855-8399
publishDate 2014-06-01
description Participation in spatial planning has been studied extensively in the past decades, but many cases of spatial planning have nonetheless seen a gap between decision makers and local residents. This is why participation in spatial planning has become a classic research question of many urban planning–related sciences. The greatest focus has been on cases of participation that present some kind of reaction to plans or actions, whereas far less attention has been given to cases of participation based on initiatives and the search for new content for underused or decaying areas. Such cases usually start with initiatives for the new use of particular places and often result in physical changes to these places. This article defines various types of local initiatives, and it especially studies the distinction between reactionary and contributive local initiatives and relates them to the notion of community. The article is based on an analysis of two particular cases. The differences in these two cases represent a foundation for the article’s conclusions, which emphasises the potentials for stimulating contributive participation. The conclusion includes recommendations for the spatial planning system to become more open to participation in terms of revitalising underused spaces because such space has been increasing during the economic downturn. The complex and inefficient system of spatial planning is turning away many creative initiatives.
topic participation
local initiatives
urban regeneration
community
url http://urbani-izziv.uirs.si/Portals/uizziv/papers/urbani-izziv-en-2014-25-01-002.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aidancerar fromreactiontoinitiativepotentialsofcontributiveparticipation
_version_ 1716857698237022208