Possibility of Microsimulation Models Calibration – Case Study in the City of Split

The paper presents a comparison of the possibility and complexity of the calibration process of two microsimulation models. The first model CORSIM is simple for use while the second named S-Paramics is more complex software. For research purposes, a model of street network with defined geometry (num...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dražen Cvitanić, Deana Breški, Ivan Lovrić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences 2012-05-01
Series:Promet (Zagreb)
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.fpz.unizg.hr/traffic/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/316
id doaj-bcb7b5ba147e4c4a8dea79cdeeca58d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bcb7b5ba147e4c4a8dea79cdeeca58d32020-11-24T21:42:57ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic SciencesPromet (Zagreb)0353-53201848-40692012-05-0124323124110.7307/ptt.v24i3.316201Possibility of Microsimulation Models Calibration – Case Study in the City of SplitDražen CvitanićDeana BreškiIvan LovrićThe paper presents a comparison of the possibility and complexity of the calibration process of two microsimulation models. The first model CORSIM is simple for use while the second named S-Paramics is more complex software. For research purposes, a model of street network with defined geometry (number, width and purpose of lanes) has been made. The volume and distribution of traffic as well as the data about traffic signals were input in the models. Numerous simulations were performed, first with the default parameters of models, and then with the calibrated parameters. Both programs have resulted in very good prediction of the intersection capacity and discharge volumes. However, for the calibration of speed more time and effort have been made in S-Paramics in which the average speed may be higher than the defined free-flow speed. This can present a problem in determining the level of service and comparing the S-Paramics results with other simulation models and analytical method results. On the other hand S-Paramics has greater capabilities than CORSIM (roundabouts modelling, dynamic traffic assignment, opportunity to interact with traffic signals...). Thus, for each specific task, one should carefully choose an appropriate program which would result in necessary and reliable output data with minimum effort and time consumed.http://www.fpz.unizg.hr/traffic/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/316microsimulationCORSIMS-Paramicscalibration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dražen Cvitanić
Deana Breški
Ivan Lovrić
spellingShingle Dražen Cvitanić
Deana Breški
Ivan Lovrić
Possibility of Microsimulation Models Calibration – Case Study in the City of Split
Promet (Zagreb)
microsimulation
CORSIM
S-Paramics
calibration
author_facet Dražen Cvitanić
Deana Breški
Ivan Lovrić
author_sort Dražen Cvitanić
title Possibility of Microsimulation Models Calibration – Case Study in the City of Split
title_short Possibility of Microsimulation Models Calibration – Case Study in the City of Split
title_full Possibility of Microsimulation Models Calibration – Case Study in the City of Split
title_fullStr Possibility of Microsimulation Models Calibration – Case Study in the City of Split
title_full_unstemmed Possibility of Microsimulation Models Calibration – Case Study in the City of Split
title_sort possibility of microsimulation models calibration – case study in the city of split
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences
series Promet (Zagreb)
issn 0353-5320
1848-4069
publishDate 2012-05-01
description The paper presents a comparison of the possibility and complexity of the calibration process of two microsimulation models. The first model CORSIM is simple for use while the second named S-Paramics is more complex software. For research purposes, a model of street network with defined geometry (number, width and purpose of lanes) has been made. The volume and distribution of traffic as well as the data about traffic signals were input in the models. Numerous simulations were performed, first with the default parameters of models, and then with the calibrated parameters. Both programs have resulted in very good prediction of the intersection capacity and discharge volumes. However, for the calibration of speed more time and effort have been made in S-Paramics in which the average speed may be higher than the defined free-flow speed. This can present a problem in determining the level of service and comparing the S-Paramics results with other simulation models and analytical method results. On the other hand S-Paramics has greater capabilities than CORSIM (roundabouts modelling, dynamic traffic assignment, opportunity to interact with traffic signals...). Thus, for each specific task, one should carefully choose an appropriate program which would result in necessary and reliable output data with minimum effort and time consumed.
topic microsimulation
CORSIM
S-Paramics
calibration
url http://www.fpz.unizg.hr/traffic/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/316
work_keys_str_mv AT drazencvitanic possibilityofmicrosimulationmodelscalibrationcasestudyinthecityofsplit
AT deanabreski possibilityofmicrosimulationmodelscalibrationcasestudyinthecityofsplit
AT ivanlovric possibilityofmicrosimulationmodelscalibrationcasestudyinthecityofsplit
_version_ 1725916123455553536