Shadows of Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet black holes

We study the shadows of the fully non-linear, asymptotically flat Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet (EdGB) black holes (BHs), for both static and rotating solutions. We find that, in all cases, these shadows are smaller than for comparable Kerr BHs, i.e. with the same total mass and angular momentum und...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedro V.P. Cunha, Carlos A.R. Herdeiro, Burkhard Kleihaus, Jutta Kunz, Eugen Radu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-05-01
Series:Physics Letters B
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269317302071
id doaj-bf793ce7b4be4af8b67370ce9922bf4f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-bf793ce7b4be4af8b67370ce9922bf4f2020-11-24T23:14:48ZengElsevierPhysics Letters B0370-26931873-24452017-05-01768C37337910.1016/j.physletb.2017.03.020Shadows of Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet black holesPedro V.P. Cunha0Carlos A.R. Herdeiro1Burkhard Kleihaus2Jutta Kunz3Eugen Radu4Departamento de Física da Universidade de Aveiro and Centre for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), Campus de Santiago, 3810-183 Aveiro, PortugalDepartamento de Física da Universidade de Aveiro and Centre for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), Campus de Santiago, 3810-183 Aveiro, PortugalInstitute of Physics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, 26111, GermanyInstitute of Physics, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, 26111, GermanyDepartamento de Física da Universidade de Aveiro and Centre for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), Campus de Santiago, 3810-183 Aveiro, PortugalWe study the shadows of the fully non-linear, asymptotically flat Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet (EdGB) black holes (BHs), for both static and rotating solutions. We find that, in all cases, these shadows are smaller than for comparable Kerr BHs, i.e. with the same total mass and angular momentum under similar observation conditions. In order to compare both cases we provide quantitative shadow parameters, observing in particular that the differences in the shadows mean radii are never larger than the percent level. Therefore, generically, EdGB BHs cannot be excluded by (near future) shadow observations alone. On the theoretical side, we find no clear signature of some exotic features of EdGB BHs on the corresponding shadows, such as the regions of negative (Komar, say) energy density outside the horizon. We speculate that this is due to the fact that the Komar energy interior to the light rings (or more precisely, the surfaces of constant radial coordinate that intersect the light rings in the equatorial plane) is always smaller than the ADM mass, and consequently the corresponding shadows are smaller than those of comparable Kerr BHs. The analysis herein provides a clear example that it is the light ring impact parameter, rather than its “size”, that determines a BH shadow.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269317302071
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pedro V.P. Cunha
Carlos A.R. Herdeiro
Burkhard Kleihaus
Jutta Kunz
Eugen Radu
spellingShingle Pedro V.P. Cunha
Carlos A.R. Herdeiro
Burkhard Kleihaus
Jutta Kunz
Eugen Radu
Shadows of Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet black holes
Physics Letters B
author_facet Pedro V.P. Cunha
Carlos A.R. Herdeiro
Burkhard Kleihaus
Jutta Kunz
Eugen Radu
author_sort Pedro V.P. Cunha
title Shadows of Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet black holes
title_short Shadows of Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet black holes
title_full Shadows of Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet black holes
title_fullStr Shadows of Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet black holes
title_full_unstemmed Shadows of Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet black holes
title_sort shadows of einstein–dilaton–gauss–bonnet black holes
publisher Elsevier
series Physics Letters B
issn 0370-2693
1873-2445
publishDate 2017-05-01
description We study the shadows of the fully non-linear, asymptotically flat Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet (EdGB) black holes (BHs), for both static and rotating solutions. We find that, in all cases, these shadows are smaller than for comparable Kerr BHs, i.e. with the same total mass and angular momentum under similar observation conditions. In order to compare both cases we provide quantitative shadow parameters, observing in particular that the differences in the shadows mean radii are never larger than the percent level. Therefore, generically, EdGB BHs cannot be excluded by (near future) shadow observations alone. On the theoretical side, we find no clear signature of some exotic features of EdGB BHs on the corresponding shadows, such as the regions of negative (Komar, say) energy density outside the horizon. We speculate that this is due to the fact that the Komar energy interior to the light rings (or more precisely, the surfaces of constant radial coordinate that intersect the light rings in the equatorial plane) is always smaller than the ADM mass, and consequently the corresponding shadows are smaller than those of comparable Kerr BHs. The analysis herein provides a clear example that it is the light ring impact parameter, rather than its “size”, that determines a BH shadow.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269317302071
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrovpcunha shadowsofeinsteindilatongaussbonnetblackholes
AT carlosarherdeiro shadowsofeinsteindilatongaussbonnetblackholes
AT burkhardkleihaus shadowsofeinsteindilatongaussbonnetblackholes
AT juttakunz shadowsofeinsteindilatongaussbonnetblackholes
AT eugenradu shadowsofeinsteindilatongaussbonnetblackholes
_version_ 1725593393191452672