Komparasi Evaluasi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi

The study aimed to test the difference between ethical evaluation, ethical intentions, and ethical orientation based on gender and discipline-based differences. Multivariate analysis of covariance (Mancova) is used as research method. The result shows that there is no difference between different et...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nikmatuniayah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Brawijaya 2013-04-01
Series:Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jamal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jamal/article/view/232/214
id doaj-c344cf967f5c47328facbba6499a0380
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c344cf967f5c47328facbba6499a03802020-11-24T22:38:54ZengUniversity of BrawijayaJurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma2086-76032089-58792013-04-0141136148Komparasi Evaluasi Etis Mahasiswa AkuntansiNikmatuniayah0Politeknik Negeri SemarangThe study aimed to test the difference between ethical evaluation, ethical intentions, and ethical orientation based on gender and discipline-based differences. Multivariate analysis of covariance (Mancova) is used as research method. The result shows that there is no difference between different ethical orientation which is relativism, justice, and egoism between two gender and different educational background. Furthermore, there is no difference in ethical intentions and ethical evaluation between men and women, yet there is difference between different academic disciplines. Finally, there is a difference between the respondent that had and had not Ethic subject in college regarding ethical orientation, intentions and evaluation.http://jamal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jamal/article/view/232/214evaluasi etisintensi etisorientasi etisgenderdisiplin ilmu
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikmatuniayah
spellingShingle Nikmatuniayah
Komparasi Evaluasi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi
Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma
evaluasi etis
intensi etis
orientasi etis
gender
disiplin ilmu
author_facet Nikmatuniayah
author_sort Nikmatuniayah
title Komparasi Evaluasi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi
title_short Komparasi Evaluasi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi
title_full Komparasi Evaluasi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi
title_fullStr Komparasi Evaluasi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi
title_full_unstemmed Komparasi Evaluasi Etis Mahasiswa Akuntansi
title_sort komparasi evaluasi etis mahasiswa akuntansi
publisher University of Brawijaya
series Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma
issn 2086-7603
2089-5879
publishDate 2013-04-01
description The study aimed to test the difference between ethical evaluation, ethical intentions, and ethical orientation based on gender and discipline-based differences. Multivariate analysis of covariance (Mancova) is used as research method. The result shows that there is no difference between different ethical orientation which is relativism, justice, and egoism between two gender and different educational background. Furthermore, there is no difference in ethical intentions and ethical evaluation between men and women, yet there is difference between different academic disciplines. Finally, there is a difference between the respondent that had and had not Ethic subject in college regarding ethical orientation, intentions and evaluation.
topic evaluasi etis
intensi etis
orientasi etis
gender
disiplin ilmu
url http://jamal.ub.ac.id/index.php/jamal/article/view/232/214
work_keys_str_mv AT nikmatuniayah komparasievaluasietismahasiswaakuntansi
_version_ 1725711287748395008