Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues

This study aimed to explore the psychophysical bases of multisensory surface stickiness perception by investigating how sensitively humans perceive different levels of stickiness intensity conveyed by auditory, tactile, and visual cues. First, we sorted five different sticky stimuli by perceived int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hyungeol Lee, Eunsil Lee, Jiye Jung, Junsuk Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02135/full
id doaj-c4e96985d1a440e7b7c5ad33ef107704
record_format Article
spelling doaj-c4e96985d1a440e7b7c5ad33ef1077042020-11-25T01:27:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-09-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.02135471990Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual CuesHyungeol Lee0Eunsil Lee1Jiye Jung2Junsuk Kim3Junsuk Kim4Department of Philosophy, Sogang University, Seoul, South KoreaDepartment of Psychology, Duksung Women’s University, Seoul, South KoreaDepartment of Psychology, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South KoreaCenter for Neuroscience Imaging Research, Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, South KoreaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South KoreaThis study aimed to explore the psychophysical bases of multisensory surface stickiness perception by investigating how sensitively humans perceive different levels of stickiness intensity conveyed by auditory, tactile, and visual cues. First, we sorted five different sticky stimuli by perceived intensity in ascending order for each modality separately and evaluated the discrimination sensitivities of each participant using a fitted psychometric curve. Results showed that perceptual intensity orders were not identical to physical intensity order and that the sequential order of perceived intensities for different modalities was inconsistent. Moreover, estimated perceptual sensitivities to surface stickiness indicated that auditory cues result in better discrimination sensitivity than tactile and visual cues. Second, we calculated the relative perceptual distances of stickiness intensities using multidimensional scaling. A follow-up statistical test demonstrated that the perceptual mapping of vision and touch are similar but that auditory perception is different. These results suggest that the discriminability of stickiness intensity is best served by auditory cues and that texture information processing in the auditory domain is distinctive from that of other modalities.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02135/fulltexture perceptionsurface stickinessauditory cuestactile cuesvisual cues
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hyungeol Lee
Eunsil Lee
Jiye Jung
Junsuk Kim
Junsuk Kim
spellingShingle Hyungeol Lee
Eunsil Lee
Jiye Jung
Junsuk Kim
Junsuk Kim
Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues
Frontiers in Psychology
texture perception
surface stickiness
auditory cues
tactile cues
visual cues
author_facet Hyungeol Lee
Eunsil Lee
Jiye Jung
Junsuk Kim
Junsuk Kim
author_sort Hyungeol Lee
title Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues
title_short Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues
title_full Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues
title_fullStr Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues
title_full_unstemmed Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues
title_sort surface stickiness perception by auditory, tactile, and visual cues
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-09-01
description This study aimed to explore the psychophysical bases of multisensory surface stickiness perception by investigating how sensitively humans perceive different levels of stickiness intensity conveyed by auditory, tactile, and visual cues. First, we sorted five different sticky stimuli by perceived intensity in ascending order for each modality separately and evaluated the discrimination sensitivities of each participant using a fitted psychometric curve. Results showed that perceptual intensity orders were not identical to physical intensity order and that the sequential order of perceived intensities for different modalities was inconsistent. Moreover, estimated perceptual sensitivities to surface stickiness indicated that auditory cues result in better discrimination sensitivity than tactile and visual cues. Second, we calculated the relative perceptual distances of stickiness intensities using multidimensional scaling. A follow-up statistical test demonstrated that the perceptual mapping of vision and touch are similar but that auditory perception is different. These results suggest that the discriminability of stickiness intensity is best served by auditory cues and that texture information processing in the auditory domain is distinctive from that of other modalities.
topic texture perception
surface stickiness
auditory cues
tactile cues
visual cues
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02135/full
work_keys_str_mv AT hyungeollee surfacestickinessperceptionbyauditorytactileandvisualcues
AT eunsillee surfacestickinessperceptionbyauditorytactileandvisualcues
AT jiyejung surfacestickinessperceptionbyauditorytactileandvisualcues
AT junsukkim surfacestickinessperceptionbyauditorytactileandvisualcues
AT junsukkim surfacestickinessperceptionbyauditorytactileandvisualcues
_version_ 1725106306940928000