Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). Materials and Methods: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2020-08-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/3226 |
id |
doaj-ce36c07692284ebfa7e5b6df44a4e1ca |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ce36c07692284ebfa7e5b6df44a4e1ca2020-11-25T04:08:33ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesFrontiers in Dentistry2676-296X2020-08-011710.18502/fid.v17i1.39653226Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical TrialAmirreza Rokn0Hadi Zare1Pardis Haddadi2Dental Implant Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, IranDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). Materials and Methods: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized gingiva bilaterally around mandibular premolars. The 6-month width of keratinized tissue, periodontal parameters (preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively), color match, pain, and total surgical time were measured. Results: The mean dimensional change of keratinized gingiva 6 months postoperatively was 4.1±0.7 mm for FGG and 8±1.7 mm for CM. Periodontal parameters were not affected in the two groups. The CM group had a significantly lower pain, experienced less surgery time, and gained better aesthetics compared to the FGG group. Conclusion: CM appears to be a suitable substitute for FGG in procedures designed to increase keratinized tissue around teeth. It has remarkable benefits, such as acceptable keratinized tissue gain, less pain, less surgical chair time, and better aesthetics. https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/3226GingivaMucograftTissue Transplantation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Amirreza Rokn Hadi Zare Pardis Haddadi |
spellingShingle |
Amirreza Rokn Hadi Zare Pardis Haddadi Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Frontiers in Dentistry Gingiva Mucograft Tissue Transplantation |
author_facet |
Amirreza Rokn Hadi Zare Pardis Haddadi |
author_sort |
Amirreza Rokn |
title |
Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_short |
Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full |
Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr |
Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial |
title_sort |
use of mucograft collagen matrix® versus free gingival graft to augment keratinized tissue around teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial |
publisher |
Tehran University of Medical Sciences |
series |
Frontiers in Dentistry |
issn |
2676-296X |
publishDate |
2020-08-01 |
description |
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG).
Materials and Methods: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized gingiva bilaterally around mandibular premolars. The 6-month width of keratinized tissue, periodontal parameters (preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively), color match, pain, and total surgical time were measured.
Results: The mean dimensional change of keratinized gingiva 6 months postoperatively was 4.1±0.7 mm for FGG and 8±1.7 mm for CM. Periodontal parameters were not affected in the two groups. The CM group had a significantly lower pain, experienced less surgery time, and gained better aesthetics compared to the FGG group.
Conclusion: CM appears to be a suitable substitute for FGG in procedures designed to increase keratinized tissue around teeth. It has remarkable benefits, such as acceptable keratinized tissue gain, less pain, less surgical chair time, and better aesthetics.
|
topic |
Gingiva Mucograft Tissue Transplantation |
url |
https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/3226 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT amirrezarokn useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT hadizare useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial AT pardishaddadi useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial |
_version_ |
1724425112579473408 |