Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). Materials and Methods: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amirreza Rokn, Hadi Zare, Pardis Haddadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2020-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/3226
id doaj-ce36c07692284ebfa7e5b6df44a4e1ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ce36c07692284ebfa7e5b6df44a4e1ca2020-11-25T04:08:33ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesFrontiers in Dentistry2676-296X2020-08-011710.18502/fid.v17i1.39653226Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical TrialAmirreza Rokn0Hadi Zare1Pardis Haddadi2Dental Implant Research Center, Dentistry Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, IranDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). Materials and Methods: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized gingiva bilaterally around mandibular premolars. The 6-month width of keratinized tissue, periodontal parameters (preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively), color match, pain, and total surgical time were measured. Results: The mean dimensional change of keratinized gingiva 6 months postoperatively was 4.1±0.7 mm for FGG and 8±1.7 mm for CM. Periodontal parameters were not affected in the two groups. The CM group had a significantly lower pain, experienced less surgery time, and gained better aesthetics compared to the FGG group. Conclusion: CM appears to be a suitable substitute for FGG in procedures designed to increase keratinized tissue around teeth. It has remarkable benefits, such as acceptable keratinized tissue gain, less pain, less surgical chair time, and better aesthetics. https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/3226GingivaMucograftTissue Transplantation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amirreza Rokn
Hadi Zare
Pardis Haddadi
spellingShingle Amirreza Rokn
Hadi Zare
Pardis Haddadi
Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Frontiers in Dentistry
Gingiva
Mucograft
Tissue Transplantation
author_facet Amirreza Rokn
Hadi Zare
Pardis Haddadi
author_sort Amirreza Rokn
title Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_short Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Use of Mucograft Collagen Matrix® versus Free Gingival Graft to Augment Keratinized Tissue Around Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
title_sort use of mucograft collagen matrix® versus free gingival graft to augment keratinized tissue around teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Frontiers in Dentistry
issn 2676-296X
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mucograft collagen matrix (CM) to increase keratinized tissue around teeth compared to free gingival graft (FGG). Materials and Methods: The present double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial studied 12 patients who had 2 mm or less keratinized gingiva bilaterally around mandibular premolars. The 6-month width of keratinized tissue, periodontal parameters (preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively), color match, pain, and total surgical time were measured. Results: The mean dimensional change of keratinized gingiva 6 months postoperatively was 4.1±0.7 mm for FGG and 8±1.7 mm for CM. Periodontal parameters were not affected in the two groups. The CM group had a significantly lower pain, experienced less surgery time, and gained better aesthetics compared to the FGG group. Conclusion: CM appears to be a suitable substitute for FGG in procedures designed to increase keratinized tissue around teeth. It has remarkable benefits, such as acceptable keratinized tissue gain, less pain, less surgical chair time, and better aesthetics.
topic Gingiva
Mucograft
Tissue Transplantation
url https://fid.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/3226
work_keys_str_mv AT amirrezarokn useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT hadizare useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT pardishaddadi useofmucograftcollagenmatrixversusfreegingivalgrafttoaugmentkeratinizedtissuearoundteetharandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
_version_ 1724425112579473408