Design and reliability of a didactic inphographic rubric assessment

• Main Authors: Yunuen Ixchel GUZMÁN-CEDILLO, Natalia LIMA-VILLEDA, José Manuel MEZA-CANO
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca 2017-12-01
• Series: Enseñanza & Teaching
• Subjects: infografía; rúbrica; evaluación; infografía didáctica
• Online Access: https://revistas.usal.es/index.php/0212-5374/article/view/17484

<p>The objective of this study is to describe design, validity process and reliability of a rubric assessment to evaluate didactic infographics quality. Participants were fifteen judges who participate in different moments of elaboration rubric process; it was made in three process phases: design, settings and reliability determination. Content validity was obtained by percentage agreement between 3 judges by component of the rubric; likewise a Krippendorff’s alpha were applied <br /> (<span>a </span>= .710) in pilot assessment with 5 infographics in order to set possible writings contradictions between components and criteria of performance. The intern consistence was determined by Cronbach’s alpha (<span>? </span>= .806) in 22 infographics gradation. An Intraclass correlation coefficient icc (<span>a </span>= .909) was applied to 6 judges qualifications also a Krippendorff’s alpha (<span>a </span>= .538) both of them in ordinal levels. The rubric is composed by 9 components, 3 performance levels, definitions of each component and assignments how to use the rubric. Results suggest the rubric is valid and reliable to grade quality of didactic infographic.</p>