Evaluation of Recommended Water Sample Collection Methods and the Impact of Holding Time on <i>Legionella</i> Recovery and Variability from Healthcare Building Water Systems

Water safety and management programs (WSMP) utilize field measurements to evaluate control limits and monitor water quality parameters including <i>Legionella</i> presence. This monitoring is important to verify that the plan is being implemented properly. However, once it has been deter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marisa B. Hirsh, Julianne L. Baron, Sue M. Mietzner, John D. Rihs, Mohamed H. Yassin, Janet E. Stout
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/11/1770
id doaj-dcd30913b008445887e20bca84575fe4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dcd30913b008445887e20bca84575fe42020-11-25T04:06:14ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072020-11-0181770177010.3390/microorganisms8111770Evaluation of Recommended Water Sample Collection Methods and the Impact of Holding Time on <i>Legionella</i> Recovery and Variability from Healthcare Building Water SystemsMarisa B. Hirsh0Julianne L. Baron1Sue M. Mietzner2John D. Rihs3Mohamed H. Yassin4Janet E. Stout5Special Pathogens Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USASpecial Pathogens Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USASpecial Pathogens Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USASpecial Pathogens Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USADepartment of Infection Control, UPMC Mercy Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USASpecial Pathogens Laboratory, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USAWater safety and management programs (WSMP) utilize field measurements to evaluate control limits and monitor water quality parameters including <i>Legionella</i> presence. This monitoring is important to verify that the plan is being implemented properly. However, once it has been determined when and how to sample for <i>Legionella</i>, it is important to choose appropriate collection and processing methods. We sought to compare processing immediate and flushed samples, filtration of different volumes collected, and sample hold times. Hot water samples were collected immediately and after a 2-min flush. These samples were plated directly and after filtration of either 100 mL, 200 mL, or 1 L. Additionally, unflushed samples were collected and processed immediately and after 1, 24, and 48 h of hold time. We found that flushed samples had significant reductions in <i>Legionella</i> counts compared to immediate samples. Processing 100 mL of that immediate sample both directly and after filter concentration yielded the highest concentration and percent sample positivity, respectively. We also show that there was no difference in culture values from time 0 compared to hold times of 1 h and 24 h. At 48 h, there were slightly fewer <i>Legionella</i> recovered than at time 0. However, <i>Legionella</i> counts were so variable based on sampling location and date that this hold time effect was minimal. The interpretation of <i>Legionella</i> culture results depends on the sample collection and processing methods used, as these can have a huge impact on the success of sampling and the validation of control measures.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/11/1770<i>Legionella</i>sample collectionsample processingenvironmental water samplesculturehold time
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marisa B. Hirsh
Julianne L. Baron
Sue M. Mietzner
John D. Rihs
Mohamed H. Yassin
Janet E. Stout
spellingShingle Marisa B. Hirsh
Julianne L. Baron
Sue M. Mietzner
John D. Rihs
Mohamed H. Yassin
Janet E. Stout
Evaluation of Recommended Water Sample Collection Methods and the Impact of Holding Time on <i>Legionella</i> Recovery and Variability from Healthcare Building Water Systems
Microorganisms
<i>Legionella</i>
sample collection
sample processing
environmental water samples
culture
hold time
author_facet Marisa B. Hirsh
Julianne L. Baron
Sue M. Mietzner
John D. Rihs
Mohamed H. Yassin
Janet E. Stout
author_sort Marisa B. Hirsh
title Evaluation of Recommended Water Sample Collection Methods and the Impact of Holding Time on <i>Legionella</i> Recovery and Variability from Healthcare Building Water Systems
title_short Evaluation of Recommended Water Sample Collection Methods and the Impact of Holding Time on <i>Legionella</i> Recovery and Variability from Healthcare Building Water Systems
title_full Evaluation of Recommended Water Sample Collection Methods and the Impact of Holding Time on <i>Legionella</i> Recovery and Variability from Healthcare Building Water Systems
title_fullStr Evaluation of Recommended Water Sample Collection Methods and the Impact of Holding Time on <i>Legionella</i> Recovery and Variability from Healthcare Building Water Systems
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Recommended Water Sample Collection Methods and the Impact of Holding Time on <i>Legionella</i> Recovery and Variability from Healthcare Building Water Systems
title_sort evaluation of recommended water sample collection methods and the impact of holding time on <i>legionella</i> recovery and variability from healthcare building water systems
publisher MDPI AG
series Microorganisms
issn 2076-2607
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Water safety and management programs (WSMP) utilize field measurements to evaluate control limits and monitor water quality parameters including <i>Legionella</i> presence. This monitoring is important to verify that the plan is being implemented properly. However, once it has been determined when and how to sample for <i>Legionella</i>, it is important to choose appropriate collection and processing methods. We sought to compare processing immediate and flushed samples, filtration of different volumes collected, and sample hold times. Hot water samples were collected immediately and after a 2-min flush. These samples were plated directly and after filtration of either 100 mL, 200 mL, or 1 L. Additionally, unflushed samples were collected and processed immediately and after 1, 24, and 48 h of hold time. We found that flushed samples had significant reductions in <i>Legionella</i> counts compared to immediate samples. Processing 100 mL of that immediate sample both directly and after filter concentration yielded the highest concentration and percent sample positivity, respectively. We also show that there was no difference in culture values from time 0 compared to hold times of 1 h and 24 h. At 48 h, there were slightly fewer <i>Legionella</i> recovered than at time 0. However, <i>Legionella</i> counts were so variable based on sampling location and date that this hold time effect was minimal. The interpretation of <i>Legionella</i> culture results depends on the sample collection and processing methods used, as these can have a huge impact on the success of sampling and the validation of control measures.
topic <i>Legionella</i>
sample collection
sample processing
environmental water samples
culture
hold time
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/11/1770
work_keys_str_mv AT marisabhirsh evaluationofrecommendedwatersamplecollectionmethodsandtheimpactofholdingtimeonilegionellairecoveryandvariabilityfromhealthcarebuildingwatersystems
AT juliannelbaron evaluationofrecommendedwatersamplecollectionmethodsandtheimpactofholdingtimeonilegionellairecoveryandvariabilityfromhealthcarebuildingwatersystems
AT suemmietzner evaluationofrecommendedwatersamplecollectionmethodsandtheimpactofholdingtimeonilegionellairecoveryandvariabilityfromhealthcarebuildingwatersystems
AT johndrihs evaluationofrecommendedwatersamplecollectionmethodsandtheimpactofholdingtimeonilegionellairecoveryandvariabilityfromhealthcarebuildingwatersystems
AT mohamedhyassin evaluationofrecommendedwatersamplecollectionmethodsandtheimpactofholdingtimeonilegionellairecoveryandvariabilityfromhealthcarebuildingwatersystems
AT janetestout evaluationofrecommendedwatersamplecollectionmethodsandtheimpactofholdingtimeonilegionellairecoveryandvariabilityfromhealthcarebuildingwatersystems
_version_ 1724431832313757696