Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature

We report two cases of retrocaval ureter that were successfully treated by a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach. Presentation of both these cases was with flank pain. Ureteroureterostomy using an intracorporeal suture technique was performed for one, and pyelopyelostomy for the other case. Operat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Singh Onkar, Gupta Shilpi, Hastir Ankur, Arvind Nand Kishore
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2010;volume=6;issue=2;spage=53;epage=55;aulast=Singh
id doaj-ddf7a94bf346413f84406c01cf0c13cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ddf7a94bf346413f84406c01cf0c13cc2020-11-24T23:35:24ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212010-01-01625355Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literatureSingh OnkarGupta ShilpiHastir AnkurArvind Nand KishoreWe report two cases of retrocaval ureter that were successfully treated by a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach. Presentation of both these cases was with flank pain. Ureteroureterostomy using an intracorporeal suture technique was performed for one, and pyelopyelostomy for the other case. Operative time was 120 min and 110 min, respectively. Pyelopyelostomy was technically easier to perform than ureteroureterostomy that required an extra fourth port insertion to facilitate dissection. With increasing experience with the intracorporeal suturing laparoscopic technique of either pyelopyelostomy or ureteroureterostomy should be the first choice for retrocaval ureter.<b> </b> http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2010;volume=6;issue=2;spage=53;epage=55;aulast=SinghRetrocaval ureterlaparoscopypyelopyelostomyureteroureterostomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Singh Onkar
Gupta Shilpi
Hastir Ankur
Arvind Nand Kishore
spellingShingle Singh Onkar
Gupta Shilpi
Hastir Ankur
Arvind Nand Kishore
Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Retrocaval ureter
laparoscopy
pyelopyelostomy
ureteroureterostomy
author_facet Singh Onkar
Gupta Shilpi
Hastir Ankur
Arvind Nand Kishore
author_sort Singh Onkar
title Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature
title_short Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature
title_full Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature
title_fullStr Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: Report of two cases and review of the literature
title_sort laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelopyelostomy and ureteroureterostomy of retrocaval ureter: report of two cases and review of the literature
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
issn 0972-9941
1998-3921
publishDate 2010-01-01
description We report two cases of retrocaval ureter that were successfully treated by a laparoscopic transperitoneal approach. Presentation of both these cases was with flank pain. Ureteroureterostomy using an intracorporeal suture technique was performed for one, and pyelopyelostomy for the other case. Operative time was 120 min and 110 min, respectively. Pyelopyelostomy was technically easier to perform than ureteroureterostomy that required an extra fourth port insertion to facilitate dissection. With increasing experience with the intracorporeal suturing laparoscopic technique of either pyelopyelostomy or ureteroureterostomy should be the first choice for retrocaval ureter.<b> </b>
topic Retrocaval ureter
laparoscopy
pyelopyelostomy
ureteroureterostomy
url http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2010;volume=6;issue=2;spage=53;epage=55;aulast=Singh
work_keys_str_mv AT singhonkar laparoscopictransperitonealpyelopyelostomyandureteroureterostomyofretrocavalureterreportoftwocasesandreviewoftheliterature
AT guptashilpi laparoscopictransperitonealpyelopyelostomyandureteroureterostomyofretrocavalureterreportoftwocasesandreviewoftheliterature
AT hastirankur laparoscopictransperitonealpyelopyelostomyandureteroureterostomyofretrocavalureterreportoftwocasesandreviewoftheliterature
AT arvindnandkishore laparoscopictransperitonealpyelopyelostomyandureteroureterostomyofretrocavalureterreportoftwocasesandreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1725526390783082496