THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES

Despite growing interest in Open Access (OA) to scholarly literature, there is an unmet need for large-scale, up-to-date, and reproducible studies assessing the prevalence and characteristics of OA. We address this need using oaDOI, an open online service that determines OA status for 67 million art...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. Piwowar, J. Priem, V. Larivière, J. P. Alperin, L. Matthias, B. Norlander, A. Farley, J. West, S. Haustein
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: National Electronic Information Consortium (NEICON) 2020-01-01
Series:Наука и научная информация
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.neiconjournal.com/jour/article/view/71
id doaj-de581652c0b44270971b6ae53283f0ea
record_format Article
spelling doaj-de581652c0b44270971b6ae53283f0ea2021-07-28T13:19:24ZrusNational Electronic Information Consortium (NEICON)Наука и научная информация2658-31432020-01-012422824710.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-4-228-24734THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLESH. Piwowar0J. Priem1V. Larivière2J. P. Alperin3L. Matthias4B. Norlander5A. Farley6J. West7S. Haustein8ImpactstoryImpactstoryÉcole de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l’information, Université de Montréal; Observatoire des Sciences et des Technologies (OST), Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur la Science et la Technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à MontréalCanadian Institute for Studies in Publishing, Simon Fraser University; Public Knowledge ProjectScholarly Communications Lab, Simon Fraser UniversityInformation School, University of Washington; FlourishOAInformation School, University of Washington; FlourishOAInformation School, University of WashingtonObservatoire des Sciences et des Technologies (OST), Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur la Science et la Technologie (CIRST), Université du Québec à Montréal; School of Information Studies, University of OttawaDespite growing interest in Open Access (OA) to scholarly literature, there is an unmet need for large-scale, up-to-date, and reproducible studies assessing the prevalence and characteristics of OA. We address this need using oaDOI, an open online service that determines OA status for 67 million articles. We use three samples, each of 100,000 articles, to investigate OA in three populations: (1) all journal articles assigned a Crossref DOI, (2) recent journal articles indexed in Web of Science, and (3) articles viewed by users of Unpaywall, an open-source browser extension that lets users find OA articles using oaDOI. We estimate that at least 28% of the scholarly literature is OA (19M in total) and that this proportion is growing, driven particularly by growth in Gold and Hybrid. The most recent year analyzed (2015) also has the highest percentage of OA (45%). Because of this growth, and the fact that readers disproportionately access newer articles, we find that Unpaywall users encounter OA quite frequently: 47% of articles they view are OA. Notably, the most common mechanism for OA is not Gold, Green, or Hybrid OA, but rather an under-discussed category we dub Bronze: articles made free-to-read on the publisher website, without an explicit Open license. We also examine the citation impact of OA articles, corroborating the so-called open-access citation advantage: accounting for age and discipline, OA articles receive 18% more citations than average, an effect driven primarily by Green and Hybrid OA. We encourage further research using the free oaDOI service, as a way to inform OA policy and practice.https://www.neiconjournal.com/jour/article/view/71open accessopen sciencescientometricspublishinglibrariesscholarly communicationbibliometricsscience policy
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author H. Piwowar
J. Priem
V. Larivière
J. P. Alperin
L. Matthias
B. Norlander
A. Farley
J. West
S. Haustein
spellingShingle H. Piwowar
J. Priem
V. Larivière
J. P. Alperin
L. Matthias
B. Norlander
A. Farley
J. West
S. Haustein
THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES
Наука и научная информация
open access
open science
scientometrics
publishing
libraries
scholarly communication
bibliometrics
science policy
author_facet H. Piwowar
J. Priem
V. Larivière
J. P. Alperin
L. Matthias
B. Norlander
A. Farley
J. West
S. Haustein
author_sort H. Piwowar
title THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES
title_short THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES
title_full THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES
title_fullStr THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES
title_full_unstemmed THE STATE OF OA: A LARGE-SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE AND IMPACT OF OPEN ACCESS ARTICLES
title_sort state of oa: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of open access articles
publisher National Electronic Information Consortium (NEICON)
series Наука и научная информация
issn 2658-3143
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Despite growing interest in Open Access (OA) to scholarly literature, there is an unmet need for large-scale, up-to-date, and reproducible studies assessing the prevalence and characteristics of OA. We address this need using oaDOI, an open online service that determines OA status for 67 million articles. We use three samples, each of 100,000 articles, to investigate OA in three populations: (1) all journal articles assigned a Crossref DOI, (2) recent journal articles indexed in Web of Science, and (3) articles viewed by users of Unpaywall, an open-source browser extension that lets users find OA articles using oaDOI. We estimate that at least 28% of the scholarly literature is OA (19M in total) and that this proportion is growing, driven particularly by growth in Gold and Hybrid. The most recent year analyzed (2015) also has the highest percentage of OA (45%). Because of this growth, and the fact that readers disproportionately access newer articles, we find that Unpaywall users encounter OA quite frequently: 47% of articles they view are OA. Notably, the most common mechanism for OA is not Gold, Green, or Hybrid OA, but rather an under-discussed category we dub Bronze: articles made free-to-read on the publisher website, without an explicit Open license. We also examine the citation impact of OA articles, corroborating the so-called open-access citation advantage: accounting for age and discipline, OA articles receive 18% more citations than average, an effect driven primarily by Green and Hybrid OA. We encourage further research using the free oaDOI service, as a way to inform OA policy and practice.
topic open access
open science
scientometrics
publishing
libraries
scholarly communication
bibliometrics
science policy
url https://www.neiconjournal.com/jour/article/view/71
work_keys_str_mv AT hpiwowar thestateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT jpriem thestateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT vlariviere thestateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT jpalperin thestateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT lmatthias thestateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT bnorlander thestateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT afarley thestateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT jwest thestateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT shaustein thestateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT hpiwowar stateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT jpriem stateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT vlariviere stateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT jpalperin stateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT lmatthias stateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT bnorlander stateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT afarley stateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT jwest stateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
AT shaustein stateofoaalargescaleanalysisoftheprevalenceandimpactofopenaccessarticles
_version_ 1721275691233705984