UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research

This study reviews the most recent literature on UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology) and UTAUT 2(Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology) 2 by focusing on the findings and recommended future research. The papers, proceedings and dissertations included in the analy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Andreas Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bina Nusantara University 2012-09-01
Series:Journal the Winners
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/winners/article/view/656
id doaj-dee607ca626b4e85a2876e33ecf626ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dee607ca626b4e85a2876e33ecf626ee2021-01-13T04:25:04ZengBina Nusantara UniversityJournal the Winners1412-12122541-23882012-09-011321011410.21512/tw.v13i2.656506UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future ResearchAndreas Chang0Binus UniversityThis study reviews the most recent literature on UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology) and UTAUT 2(Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology) 2 by focusing on the findings and recommended future research. The papers, proceedings and dissertations included in the analysis were identified technology acceptance as the focus of their studies. This search was supplemented various websites which host scientific journals such as Emerald, Science Direct and Google Scholar. The initial search produced 65 papers. The studies examined works which employed UTAUT and UTAUT 2 by focusing on findings on the core constructs of UTAUT to predict Behavioral Intentions. The results confirmed previous studies that the four constructs of UTAUT contributed to Behavioral Intention even though PE seemed to be the most significant contributors. Findings also suggest UTAUT 2 has been more explanatory and list the suggestions for future works. The immediate implications are for researchers who wish to examine behavioral intentions, and managers who wish to ensure the acceptance and use of a new system or technology. This study bears a number of limitations. Number of papers examined is one of them. It would be more accurate to increase the number of paper examined. The other limitation is the ability to draw a statistical conclusion each research examined. This is due to a great variety of research topics, methods, constructs and contexts.https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/winners/article/view/656behavioral intentiontechnology acceptancetechnology useutaut and utaut 2
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andreas Chang
spellingShingle Andreas Chang
UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
Journal the Winners
behavioral intention
technology acceptance
technology use
utaut and utaut 2
author_facet Andreas Chang
author_sort Andreas Chang
title UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
title_short UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
title_full UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
title_fullStr UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
title_full_unstemmed UTAUT and UTAUT 2: A Review and Agenda for Future Research
title_sort utaut and utaut 2: a review and agenda for future research
publisher Bina Nusantara University
series Journal the Winners
issn 1412-1212
2541-2388
publishDate 2012-09-01
description This study reviews the most recent literature on UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology) and UTAUT 2(Unified Theory of Acceptance, and Use of Technology) 2 by focusing on the findings and recommended future research. The papers, proceedings and dissertations included in the analysis were identified technology acceptance as the focus of their studies. This search was supplemented various websites which host scientific journals such as Emerald, Science Direct and Google Scholar. The initial search produced 65 papers. The studies examined works which employed UTAUT and UTAUT 2 by focusing on findings on the core constructs of UTAUT to predict Behavioral Intentions. The results confirmed previous studies that the four constructs of UTAUT contributed to Behavioral Intention even though PE seemed to be the most significant contributors. Findings also suggest UTAUT 2 has been more explanatory and list the suggestions for future works. The immediate implications are for researchers who wish to examine behavioral intentions, and managers who wish to ensure the acceptance and use of a new system or technology. This study bears a number of limitations. Number of papers examined is one of them. It would be more accurate to increase the number of paper examined. The other limitation is the ability to draw a statistical conclusion each research examined. This is due to a great variety of research topics, methods, constructs and contexts.
topic behavioral intention
technology acceptance
technology use
utaut and utaut 2
url https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/winners/article/view/656
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaschang utautandutaut2areviewandagendaforfutureresearch
_version_ 1724339439029714944