THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: The Battle for the Future of Food

First paragraphs: We are in the midst of a battle for the future of our food systems. In spite of persistent denials, today’s so-called modern food system simply cannot be sustained for much longer. Mounting evidence of the negative impacts of today’s dominant systems of food production on the n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John Ikerd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems 2018-08-01
Series:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/619
id doaj-e2cdd2d4e9aa45eda9ad997b89524a50
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2cdd2d4e9aa45eda9ad997b89524a502020-11-25T02:57:49ZengThomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food SystemsJournal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development2152-08012018-08-018310.5304/jafscd.2018.083.006619THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: The Battle for the Future of FoodJohn Ikerd First paragraphs: We are in the midst of a battle for the future of our food systems. In spite of persistent denials, today’s so-called modern food system simply cannot be sustained for much longer. Mounting evidence of the negative impacts of today’s dominant systems of food production on the natural environment, public health, animal welfare, and the quality of rural life is becoming difficult to deny or ignore.  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) consistently identifies agriculture as the leading nonpoint source of pollution of rivers and streams and a major contributor to pollution of lakes, wetlands, estuaries, and groundwater (U.S. EPA, n.d.). Massive “dead zones,” such as those in the Gulf of Mexico and Chesapeake Bay, devel­oped with the industrialization of American agri­culture (National Geographic Society, 2011). Agriculture has also been identified as a major contributor to global climate change. Experts disagree, but an emerging consensus seems to be that agriculture globally contributes about 15% of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions—about the same as transportation (Nahigyan, 2016). Animal agriculture is a major contributor, and environmentalists have joined animal welfare advocates in calling for an end to industrial animal agriculture.... https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/619Industrial AgriculturePollutionIndustrial OrganicAgroecology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John Ikerd
spellingShingle John Ikerd
THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: The Battle for the Future of Food
Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Industrial Agriculture
Pollution
Industrial Organic
Agroecology
author_facet John Ikerd
author_sort John Ikerd
title THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: The Battle for the Future of Food
title_short THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: The Battle for the Future of Food
title_full THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: The Battle for the Future of Food
title_fullStr THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: The Battle for the Future of Food
title_full_unstemmed THE ECONOMIC PAMPHLETEER: The Battle for the Future of Food
title_sort economic pamphleteer: the battle for the future of food
publisher Thomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
series Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
issn 2152-0801
publishDate 2018-08-01
description First paragraphs: We are in the midst of a battle for the future of our food systems. In spite of persistent denials, today’s so-called modern food system simply cannot be sustained for much longer. Mounting evidence of the negative impacts of today’s dominant systems of food production on the natural environment, public health, animal welfare, and the quality of rural life is becoming difficult to deny or ignore.  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) consistently identifies agriculture as the leading nonpoint source of pollution of rivers and streams and a major contributor to pollution of lakes, wetlands, estuaries, and groundwater (U.S. EPA, n.d.). Massive “dead zones,” such as those in the Gulf of Mexico and Chesapeake Bay, devel­oped with the industrialization of American agri­culture (National Geographic Society, 2011). Agriculture has also been identified as a major contributor to global climate change. Experts disagree, but an emerging consensus seems to be that agriculture globally contributes about 15% of human-caused greenhouse gas emissions—about the same as transportation (Nahigyan, 2016). Animal agriculture is a major contributor, and environmentalists have joined animal welfare advocates in calling for an end to industrial animal agriculture....
topic Industrial Agriculture
Pollution
Industrial Organic
Agroecology
url https://www.foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/619
work_keys_str_mv AT johnikerd theeconomicpamphleteerthebattleforthefutureoffood
AT johnikerd economicpamphleteerthebattleforthefutureoffood
_version_ 1724709387567628288