Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol

Abstract Background Mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) experience profound communication impairment, placing them at risk for poor physical and psychological outcomes. Patient communication strategies such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and voice r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Istanboulian, Louise Rose, Yana Yunusova, Franklin Gorospe, Craig Dale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-12-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1232-0
id doaj-e84d3dff5d8c4216b080435592818c54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e84d3dff5d8c4216b080435592818c542020-12-06T12:10:06ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532019-12-01811710.1186/s13643-019-1232-0Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocolLaura Istanboulian0Louise Rose1Yana Yunusova2Franklin Gorospe3Craig Dale4Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of TorontoFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s CollegeDepartment of Speech and Language Pathology, University of TorontoLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of TorontoLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of TorontoAbstract Background Mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) experience profound communication impairment, placing them at risk for poor physical and psychological outcomes. Patient communication strategies such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and voice restorative devices are recommended to facilitate communication. These strategies, however, are inconsistently adopted in ICU practice signaling utilization barriers. Our objective is to map and synthesize the current evidence-base for stakeholder-reported barriers and facilitators to patient communication strategy utilization for adults with an advanced airway in the ICU. Methods and analysis We will use Arskey and O’Malley’s recommended methods to conduct a scoping review using a rapid review framework to streamline the process. A single reviewer will conduct a search and an initial screen of titles and abstracts from five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], and PsychInfo) from 1990 to present to identify English language peer-reviewed studies. Subsequently, two reviewers will independently screen a shorter list of studies for inclusion. We will also search the reference lists of eligible studies. Two reviewers will independently extract study characteristics, communication strategy, and stakeholder reported barriers and facilitators. We will code and categorize the extracted barriers and facilitators according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), an integrative framework of behavior change. Discussion To our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to map and synthesize reported barriers and facilitators to communication strategy utilization in the adult ICU using a theoretical framework. The results of this scoping review will help to identify trends and gaps in the current evidence-base and support recommendations for improving patient-centered practice, policy, and research related to successfully establishing ICU patient communication.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1232-0CommunicationCritical careAugmentative and alternative communicationBarriers and facilitatorsTheoretical Domains Framework
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Istanboulian
Louise Rose
Yana Yunusova
Franklin Gorospe
Craig Dale
spellingShingle Laura Istanboulian
Louise Rose
Yana Yunusova
Franklin Gorospe
Craig Dale
Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
Systematic Reviews
Communication
Critical care
Augmentative and alternative communication
Barriers and facilitators
Theoretical Domains Framework
author_facet Laura Istanboulian
Louise Rose
Yana Yunusova
Franklin Gorospe
Craig Dale
author_sort Laura Istanboulian
title Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_short Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_full Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
title_sort barriers to and facilitators for use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative devices in the adult intensive care unit: a scoping review protocol
publisher BMC
series Systematic Reviews
issn 2046-4053
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Abstract Background Mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) experience profound communication impairment, placing them at risk for poor physical and psychological outcomes. Patient communication strategies such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and voice restorative devices are recommended to facilitate communication. These strategies, however, are inconsistently adopted in ICU practice signaling utilization barriers. Our objective is to map and synthesize the current evidence-base for stakeholder-reported barriers and facilitators to patient communication strategy utilization for adults with an advanced airway in the ICU. Methods and analysis We will use Arskey and O’Malley’s recommended methods to conduct a scoping review using a rapid review framework to streamline the process. A single reviewer will conduct a search and an initial screen of titles and abstracts from five electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature [CINAHL], and PsychInfo) from 1990 to present to identify English language peer-reviewed studies. Subsequently, two reviewers will independently screen a shorter list of studies for inclusion. We will also search the reference lists of eligible studies. Two reviewers will independently extract study characteristics, communication strategy, and stakeholder reported barriers and facilitators. We will code and categorize the extracted barriers and facilitators according to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), an integrative framework of behavior change. Discussion To our knowledge, this will be the first scoping review to map and synthesize reported barriers and facilitators to communication strategy utilization in the adult ICU using a theoretical framework. The results of this scoping review will help to identify trends and gaps in the current evidence-base and support recommendations for improving patient-centered practice, policy, and research related to successfully establishing ICU patient communication.
topic Communication
Critical care
Augmentative and alternative communication
Barriers and facilitators
Theoretical Domains Framework
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1232-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lauraistanboulian barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol
AT louiserose barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol
AT yanayunusova barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol
AT franklingorospe barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol
AT craigdale barrierstoandfacilitatorsforuseofaugmentativeandalternativecommunicationandvoicerestorativedevicesintheadultintensivecareunitascopingreviewprotocol
_version_ 1724399256548147200