Improving Critical Reading with E-Texts: A Controlled Study in a Collegiate Philosophy Course

This project investigated the impact of incorporating e-reader texts and annotation tools in an upper level philosophy course. This project adds to the body of literature that assesses gains/losses in conventional measures of performance (e.g., scores on graded assignments) and changes in student at...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mark Jensen, Lauren Scharff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals-playground/index.php/josotl/article/view/23978
id doaj-e8abe877db2b469a89cbeb61bedc8cd2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e8abe877db2b469a89cbeb61bedc8cd22020-11-25T00:25:37ZengIndiana University Office of Scholarly PublishingJournal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1527-93162019-01-0119310.14434/josotl.v19i2.23978Improving Critical Reading with E-Texts: A Controlled Study in a Collegiate Philosophy CourseMark Jensen0Lauren Scharff1United States Air Force AcademyUnited States Air Force AcademyThis project investigated the impact of incorporating e-reader texts and annotation tools in an upper level philosophy course. This project adds to the body of literature that assesses gains/losses in conventional measures of performance (e.g., scores on graded assignments) and changes in student attitudes as reported in questionnaires. However, this project was unique in that it focused on training students to use e-reader tools for critical reading practices and it included assessment of student annotations and their relationship with the performance measures. We tested the hypothesis that, with intentional training and a course-design that provided multiple opportunities for practice and feedback, students using e-readers for critical engagement with their reading assignments would demonstrate (a) deeper understanding of the content of the texts, (b) improvement in their use of critical reading practices, and (c) improvement in their attitudes toward the use of e-readers for academic work. While we did not observe significant gains in graded assignments compared with control groups using printed texts, we found no evidence of losses for students using e-readers. At the same time, we found evidence of improvement in students’ critical reading practices, especially when paired with modeling and practice throughout the term. We also observed significant positive changes in student attitudes toward the use of e-readers for academic work, compared with controls. Our findings suggest that achieving the benefits of e-readers for the development of critical reading skills requires a course with design elements that are specifically tailored to this purpose.https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals-playground/index.php/josotl/article/view/23978critical readinge-texte-booke-readerannotationcourse design
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mark Jensen
Lauren Scharff
spellingShingle Mark Jensen
Lauren Scharff
Improving Critical Reading with E-Texts: A Controlled Study in a Collegiate Philosophy Course
Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
critical reading
e-text
e-book
e-reader
annotation
course design
author_facet Mark Jensen
Lauren Scharff
author_sort Mark Jensen
title Improving Critical Reading with E-Texts: A Controlled Study in a Collegiate Philosophy Course
title_short Improving Critical Reading with E-Texts: A Controlled Study in a Collegiate Philosophy Course
title_full Improving Critical Reading with E-Texts: A Controlled Study in a Collegiate Philosophy Course
title_fullStr Improving Critical Reading with E-Texts: A Controlled Study in a Collegiate Philosophy Course
title_full_unstemmed Improving Critical Reading with E-Texts: A Controlled Study in a Collegiate Philosophy Course
title_sort improving critical reading with e-texts: a controlled study in a collegiate philosophy course
publisher Indiana University Office of Scholarly Publishing
series Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
issn 1527-9316
publishDate 2019-01-01
description This project investigated the impact of incorporating e-reader texts and annotation tools in an upper level philosophy course. This project adds to the body of literature that assesses gains/losses in conventional measures of performance (e.g., scores on graded assignments) and changes in student attitudes as reported in questionnaires. However, this project was unique in that it focused on training students to use e-reader tools for critical reading practices and it included assessment of student annotations and their relationship with the performance measures. We tested the hypothesis that, with intentional training and a course-design that provided multiple opportunities for practice and feedback, students using e-readers for critical engagement with their reading assignments would demonstrate (a) deeper understanding of the content of the texts, (b) improvement in their use of critical reading practices, and (c) improvement in their attitudes toward the use of e-readers for academic work. While we did not observe significant gains in graded assignments compared with control groups using printed texts, we found no evidence of losses for students using e-readers. At the same time, we found evidence of improvement in students’ critical reading practices, especially when paired with modeling and practice throughout the term. We also observed significant positive changes in student attitudes toward the use of e-readers for academic work, compared with controls. Our findings suggest that achieving the benefits of e-readers for the development of critical reading skills requires a course with design elements that are specifically tailored to this purpose.
topic critical reading
e-text
e-book
e-reader
annotation
course design
url https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals-playground/index.php/josotl/article/view/23978
work_keys_str_mv AT markjensen improvingcriticalreadingwithetextsacontrolledstudyinacollegiatephilosophycourse
AT laurenscharff improvingcriticalreadingwithetextsacontrolledstudyinacollegiatephilosophycourse
_version_ 1725347851374952448