Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND:The comparison between long acting insulin analogues (LAIA) and human insulin (NPH) has been investigated for decades, with many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews giving mixed results. This overlapping and contradictory evidence has increased uncertainty on covera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fernanda O Laranjeira, Keitty R C de Andrade, Ana C M G Figueiredo, Everton N Silva, Mauricio G Pereira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5896894?pdf=render
id doaj-e9d125e1edef4ebb872734ff342fa459
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e9d125e1edef4ebb872734ff342fa4592020-11-24T21:37:04ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01134e019480110.1371/journal.pone.0194801Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Fernanda O LaranjeiraKeitty R C de AndradeAna C M G FigueiredoEverton N SilvaMauricio G PereiraBACKGROUND:The comparison between long acting insulin analogues (LAIA) and human insulin (NPH) has been investigated for decades, with many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews giving mixed results. This overlapping and contradictory evidence has increased uncertainty on coverage decisions at health systems level. AIM:To conduct an overview of systematic reviews and update existing reviews, preparing new meta-analysis to determine whether LAIA are effective for T1D patients compared to NPH. METHODS:We identified systematic reviews of RCTs that evaluated the efficacy of LAIA glargine or detemir, compared to NPH insulin for T1D, assessing glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and hypoglycemia. Data sources included Pubmed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and hand-searching. The methodological quality of studies was independently assessed by two reviewers, using AMSTAR and Jadad scale. We found 11 eligible systematic reviews that contained a total of 25 relevant clinical trials. Two reviewers independently abstracted data. RESULTS:We found evidence that LAIA are efficacious compared to NPH, with estimates showing a reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia episodes (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57; 0.76) and A1C (95% CI 0.23; 0.12). No significance was found related to severe hypoglycemia (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.71; 1.24). CONCLUSION:This study design has allowed us to carry out the most comprehensive assessment of RCTs on this subject, filling a gap in diabetes research. Our paper addresses a question that is important not only for decision makers but also for clinicians.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5896894?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fernanda O Laranjeira
Keitty R C de Andrade
Ana C M G Figueiredo
Everton N Silva
Mauricio G Pereira
spellingShingle Fernanda O Laranjeira
Keitty R C de Andrade
Ana C M G Figueiredo
Everton N Silva
Mauricio G Pereira
Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Fernanda O Laranjeira
Keitty R C de Andrade
Ana C M G Figueiredo
Everton N Silva
Mauricio G Pereira
author_sort Fernanda O Laranjeira
title Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_short Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_fullStr Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_full_unstemmed Long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
title_sort long-acting insulin analogues for type 1 diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description BACKGROUND:The comparison between long acting insulin analogues (LAIA) and human insulin (NPH) has been investigated for decades, with many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews giving mixed results. This overlapping and contradictory evidence has increased uncertainty on coverage decisions at health systems level. AIM:To conduct an overview of systematic reviews and update existing reviews, preparing new meta-analysis to determine whether LAIA are effective for T1D patients compared to NPH. METHODS:We identified systematic reviews of RCTs that evaluated the efficacy of LAIA glargine or detemir, compared to NPH insulin for T1D, assessing glycated hemoglobin (A1C) and hypoglycemia. Data sources included Pubmed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and hand-searching. The methodological quality of studies was independently assessed by two reviewers, using AMSTAR and Jadad scale. We found 11 eligible systematic reviews that contained a total of 25 relevant clinical trials. Two reviewers independently abstracted data. RESULTS:We found evidence that LAIA are efficacious compared to NPH, with estimates showing a reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia episodes (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.57; 0.76) and A1C (95% CI 0.23; 0.12). No significance was found related to severe hypoglycemia (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.71; 1.24). CONCLUSION:This study design has allowed us to carry out the most comprehensive assessment of RCTs on this subject, filling a gap in diabetes research. Our paper addresses a question that is important not only for decision makers but also for clinicians.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5896894?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandaolaranjeira longactinginsulinanaloguesfortype1diabetesanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT keittyrcdeandrade longactinginsulinanaloguesfortype1diabetesanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT anacmgfigueiredo longactinginsulinanaloguesfortype1diabetesanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT evertonnsilva longactinginsulinanaloguesfortype1diabetesanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mauriciogpereira longactinginsulinanaloguesfortype1diabetesanoverviewofsystematicreviewsandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
_version_ 1725938418528026624