Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study

The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anne Müller, Sarah Marie Mertens, Gerd Göstemeyer, Joachim Krois, Falk Schwendicke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/8/1612
id doaj-f29a8c7fa2dc45be830b9ba16721d522
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f29a8c7fa2dc45be830b9ba16721d5222021-04-10T23:02:06ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-04-01101612161210.3390/jcm10081612Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative StudyAnne Müller0Sarah Marie Mertens1Gerd Göstemeyer2Joachim Krois3Falk Schwendicke4Department of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Aßmannshauser Str. 4-6, 14197 Berlin, GermanyThe present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/snowball sampling). A questionnaire developed along the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations influencing Behaviors model (COM-B) was used to guide interviews. Mayring’s content analysis was employed to point out barriers and enablers. We identified 36 barriers, conflicting themes or enablers, covering nine of the fourteen domains of the TDF and all three determinants of behavior (COM). Both stakeholders emphasized chances and hopes for AI. A range of enablers for implementing AI in dental diagnostics were identified (e.g., the chance for higher diagnostic accuracy, a reduced workload, more comprehensive reporting and better patient–provider communication). Barriers related to reliance on AI and responsibility for medical decisions, as well as the explainability of AI and the related option to de-bug AI applications, emerged. Decision-makers and industry may want to consider these aspects to foster implementation of AI in dentistry.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/8/1612artificial intelligenceradiography dental digitalqualitative researchmodels psychologicalmodels theoretical
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anne Müller
Sarah Marie Mertens
Gerd Göstemeyer
Joachim Krois
Falk Schwendicke
spellingShingle Anne Müller
Sarah Marie Mertens
Gerd Göstemeyer
Joachim Krois
Falk Schwendicke
Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
Journal of Clinical Medicine
artificial intelligence
radiography dental digital
qualitative research
models psychological
models theoretical
author_facet Anne Müller
Sarah Marie Mertens
Gerd Göstemeyer
Joachim Krois
Falk Schwendicke
author_sort Anne Müller
title Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_short Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_full Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and Enablers for Artificial Intelligence in Dental Diagnostics: A Qualitative Study
title_sort barriers and enablers for artificial intelligence in dental diagnostics: a qualitative study
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2021-04-01
description The present study aimed to identify barriers and enablers for the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental, specifically radiographic, diagnostics. Semi-structured phone interviews with dentists and patients were conducted between the end of May and the end of June 2020 (convenience/snowball sampling). A questionnaire developed along the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivations influencing Behaviors model (COM-B) was used to guide interviews. Mayring’s content analysis was employed to point out barriers and enablers. We identified 36 barriers, conflicting themes or enablers, covering nine of the fourteen domains of the TDF and all three determinants of behavior (COM). Both stakeholders emphasized chances and hopes for AI. A range of enablers for implementing AI in dental diagnostics were identified (e.g., the chance for higher diagnostic accuracy, a reduced workload, more comprehensive reporting and better patient–provider communication). Barriers related to reliance on AI and responsibility for medical decisions, as well as the explainability of AI and the related option to de-bug AI applications, emerged. Decision-makers and industry may want to consider these aspects to foster implementation of AI in dentistry.
topic artificial intelligence
radiography dental digital
qualitative research
models psychological
models theoretical
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/8/1612
work_keys_str_mv AT annemuller barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy
AT sarahmariemertens barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy
AT gerdgostemeyer barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy
AT joachimkrois barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy
AT falkschwendicke barriersandenablersforartificialintelligenceindentaldiagnosticsaqualitativestudy
_version_ 1721531775354667008