How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States

We sought to describe how revenues from sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise taxes in 7 U.S. cities are being allocated, who is benefiting from these investments, and whether allocations are consistent with the original intent of tax legislation. We collected information from public documents and k...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Krieger, Kiran Magee, Tayler Hennings, John Schoof, Kristine A. Madsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-09-01
Series:Preventive Medicine Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335521000784
id doaj-f4ebdd95bb294d82abc2dab5f52f1689
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f4ebdd95bb294d82abc2dab5f52f16892021-08-14T04:29:51ZengElsevierPreventive Medicine Reports2211-33552021-09-0123101388How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United StatesJames Krieger0Kiran Magee1Tayler Hennings2John Schoof3Kristine A. Madsen4University of Washington, Department of Health Services, USACommunity Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USACommunity Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USAUniversity of Washington, Department of Epidemiology, USABerkeley Food Institute and the Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA; Corresponding author.We sought to describe how revenues from sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise taxes in 7 U.S. cities are being allocated, who is benefiting from these investments, and whether allocations are consistent with the original intent of tax legislation. We collected information from public documents and key informants about allocations in the most recent fiscal year available (ranging from 2018 to 2021). Across the 7 U.S. cities with taxes, the average annual revenue from SSB taxes totaled $133.9 M. In the fiscal year studied, cities allocated a total of $133.2 M in SSB tax revenues. Human and community capital investments totaled $89.6 M (67% of all allocations) funding early childhood development, community infrastructure improvements, and youth and workforce development. Health-related investments totaled $36.9 M (28% of total allocations), funding access to healthy foods and beverages; support for physical activity opportunities; promotion of overall physical, mental or social health and wellbeing; health and nutrition education; chronic-disease prevention and management; and reducing SSB consumption. In the 3 cities that specified how tax revenues would be spent, allocations were consistent with promised uses of revenues. In addition, 85% of aggregated revenues ($112.9 M) were targeted to support work and programs in impacted communities (communities that experience health inequities, discrimination and exclusion). SSB tax revenues are supporting initiatives to improve community health, develop human and community capital, and advance equity. These investments may yield additional health benefits beyond those resulting from lower SSB consumption. Consistent tracking and public reporting on revenue allocations would increase transparency and accountability.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335521000784Sugar-sweetened beveragesTaxesRevenue allocationEquityHealth policy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James Krieger
Kiran Magee
Tayler Hennings
John Schoof
Kristine A. Madsen
spellingShingle James Krieger
Kiran Magee
Tayler Hennings
John Schoof
Kristine A. Madsen
How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States
Preventive Medicine Reports
Sugar-sweetened beverages
Taxes
Revenue allocation
Equity
Health policy
author_facet James Krieger
Kiran Magee
Tayler Hennings
John Schoof
Kristine A. Madsen
author_sort James Krieger
title How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States
title_short How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States
title_full How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States
title_fullStr How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States
title_full_unstemmed How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States
title_sort how sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the united states
publisher Elsevier
series Preventive Medicine Reports
issn 2211-3355
publishDate 2021-09-01
description We sought to describe how revenues from sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) excise taxes in 7 U.S. cities are being allocated, who is benefiting from these investments, and whether allocations are consistent with the original intent of tax legislation. We collected information from public documents and key informants about allocations in the most recent fiscal year available (ranging from 2018 to 2021). Across the 7 U.S. cities with taxes, the average annual revenue from SSB taxes totaled $133.9 M. In the fiscal year studied, cities allocated a total of $133.2 M in SSB tax revenues. Human and community capital investments totaled $89.6 M (67% of all allocations) funding early childhood development, community infrastructure improvements, and youth and workforce development. Health-related investments totaled $36.9 M (28% of total allocations), funding access to healthy foods and beverages; support for physical activity opportunities; promotion of overall physical, mental or social health and wellbeing; health and nutrition education; chronic-disease prevention and management; and reducing SSB consumption. In the 3 cities that specified how tax revenues would be spent, allocations were consistent with promised uses of revenues. In addition, 85% of aggregated revenues ($112.9 M) were targeted to support work and programs in impacted communities (communities that experience health inequities, discrimination and exclusion). SSB tax revenues are supporting initiatives to improve community health, develop human and community capital, and advance equity. These investments may yield additional health benefits beyond those resulting from lower SSB consumption. Consistent tracking and public reporting on revenue allocations would increase transparency and accountability.
topic Sugar-sweetened beverages
Taxes
Revenue allocation
Equity
Health policy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335521000784
work_keys_str_mv AT jameskrieger howsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxrevenuesarebeingusedintheunitedstates
AT kiranmagee howsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxrevenuesarebeingusedintheunitedstates
AT taylerhennings howsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxrevenuesarebeingusedintheunitedstates
AT johnschoof howsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxrevenuesarebeingusedintheunitedstates
AT kristineamadsen howsugarsweetenedbeveragetaxrevenuesarebeingusedintheunitedstates
_version_ 1721207945118613504