Sense of personal control: Can it be assessed culturally unbiased across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians?

In recent decades, several studies have emphasized sense of personal control as a prominent aspect of Aboriginal health. However, one limitation is that instruments available to measure personal control were originally developed in western countries and validation for Aboriginal Australians has not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago, Tine Nielsen, Rachel Roberts, Lisa Gaye Smithers, Lisa Jamieson, Karl Bang Christensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529283/?tool=EBI
id doaj-f56132009ebc4e00931f881395879043
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f56132009ebc4e00931f8813958790432020-11-25T03:56:52ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-011510Sense of personal control: Can it be assessed culturally unbiased across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians?Pedro Henrique Ribeiro SantiagoTine NielsenRachel RobertsLisa Gaye SmithersLisa JamiesonKarl Bang ChristensenIn recent decades, several studies have emphasized sense of personal control as a prominent aspect of Aboriginal health. However, one limitation is that instruments available to measure personal control were originally developed in western countries and validation for Aboriginal Australians has not been conducted. The aims of the current study were to evaluate whether the Sense of Personal Control Scale (SPCS) can be used to obtain culturally unbiased measurement of personal control across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians and to assess the psychometric properties of the SPCS for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australian. Methods: The current study utilized two Australian subsamples retrieved from the Teeth Talk Study (n = 317) and the National Survey of Adult Oral Health 2004–2006 (n = 3,857) in which the SPCS was included. Graphical Loglinear Rasch Models (GLLRM) were used to fulfill the aims of the study. Results: The Perceived Constraints subscale fitted a GLLRM for Aboriginal Australians after the exclusion of three items, while fit to any Rasch model (RM) or GLLRM model could not be found in the non-Aboriginal sample. The Mastery subscale fitted a GLLRM in the non-Aboriginal sample after the exclusion of one item. In the Aboriginal sample, two items of the Mastery subscale fitted the RM, however, two items cannot be considered as a scale. Conclusion: In the present study, we showed that the development of new items is crucial before the revised SPCS might constitute a valid and reliable measure of sense of personal control in both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australian populations, and it is possible to assess whether the SPCS can be measured without bias across these two populations.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529283/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago
Tine Nielsen
Rachel Roberts
Lisa Gaye Smithers
Lisa Jamieson
Karl Bang Christensen
spellingShingle Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago
Tine Nielsen
Rachel Roberts
Lisa Gaye Smithers
Lisa Jamieson
Karl Bang Christensen
Sense of personal control: Can it be assessed culturally unbiased across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago
Tine Nielsen
Rachel Roberts
Lisa Gaye Smithers
Lisa Jamieson
Karl Bang Christensen
author_sort Pedro Henrique Ribeiro Santiago
title Sense of personal control: Can it be assessed culturally unbiased across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians?
title_short Sense of personal control: Can it be assessed culturally unbiased across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians?
title_full Sense of personal control: Can it be assessed culturally unbiased across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians?
title_fullStr Sense of personal control: Can it be assessed culturally unbiased across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians?
title_full_unstemmed Sense of personal control: Can it be assessed culturally unbiased across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians?
title_sort sense of personal control: can it be assessed culturally unbiased across aboriginal and non-aboriginal australians?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description In recent decades, several studies have emphasized sense of personal control as a prominent aspect of Aboriginal health. However, one limitation is that instruments available to measure personal control were originally developed in western countries and validation for Aboriginal Australians has not been conducted. The aims of the current study were to evaluate whether the Sense of Personal Control Scale (SPCS) can be used to obtain culturally unbiased measurement of personal control across Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australians and to assess the psychometric properties of the SPCS for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australian. Methods: The current study utilized two Australian subsamples retrieved from the Teeth Talk Study (n = 317) and the National Survey of Adult Oral Health 2004–2006 (n = 3,857) in which the SPCS was included. Graphical Loglinear Rasch Models (GLLRM) were used to fulfill the aims of the study. Results: The Perceived Constraints subscale fitted a GLLRM for Aboriginal Australians after the exclusion of three items, while fit to any Rasch model (RM) or GLLRM model could not be found in the non-Aboriginal sample. The Mastery subscale fitted a GLLRM in the non-Aboriginal sample after the exclusion of one item. In the Aboriginal sample, two items of the Mastery subscale fitted the RM, however, two items cannot be considered as a scale. Conclusion: In the present study, we showed that the development of new items is crucial before the revised SPCS might constitute a valid and reliable measure of sense of personal control in both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Australian populations, and it is possible to assess whether the SPCS can be measured without bias across these two populations.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7529283/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrohenriqueribeirosantiago senseofpersonalcontrolcanitbeassessedculturallyunbiasedacrossaboriginalandnonaboriginalaustralians
AT tinenielsen senseofpersonalcontrolcanitbeassessedculturallyunbiasedacrossaboriginalandnonaboriginalaustralians
AT rachelroberts senseofpersonalcontrolcanitbeassessedculturallyunbiasedacrossaboriginalandnonaboriginalaustralians
AT lisagayesmithers senseofpersonalcontrolcanitbeassessedculturallyunbiasedacrossaboriginalandnonaboriginalaustralians
AT lisajamieson senseofpersonalcontrolcanitbeassessedculturallyunbiasedacrossaboriginalandnonaboriginalaustralians
AT karlbangchristensen senseofpersonalcontrolcanitbeassessedculturallyunbiasedacrossaboriginalandnonaboriginalaustralians
_version_ 1724463363700817920