Status of Robots in Moral and Legal Systems
David J. Gunkel in his latest book Robot Rights presents the opportunities and challenges of integrating robots into moral and legal systems. The research question asked by the author is “Can and should robots have rights”? Following the Humean distinction between “is” and “ought”, Gunkel creates f...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Adam Mickiewicz University
2019-10-01
|
Series: | Ethics in Progress |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/view/19970 |
id |
doaj-f60c13db368c4de2acea55fab6ca23b4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-f60c13db368c4de2acea55fab6ca23b42020-11-25T03:28:54ZdeuAdam Mickiewicz UniversityEthics in Progress2084-92572019-10-0110210.14746/eip.2019.2.318380Status of Robots in Moral and Legal SystemsKatarzyna Ginszt0Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin David J. Gunkel in his latest book Robot Rights presents the opportunities and challenges of integrating robots into moral and legal systems. The research question asked by the author is “Can and should robots have rights”? Following the Humean distinction between “is” and “ought”, Gunkel creates four statements that either opt for or against incorporating robots into legal discourse. The four modalities group contrasting opinions developed by different scholars on the subject of the eponymous robot rights. The author provides readers with yet another alternative approach to the question of legal recognition of robots which is based on Levinasian philosophy. http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/view/19970robot rightstechnological developmentAImoral systemlegal systemroboethics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Katarzyna Ginszt |
spellingShingle |
Katarzyna Ginszt Status of Robots in Moral and Legal Systems Ethics in Progress robot rights technological development AI moral system legal system roboethics |
author_facet |
Katarzyna Ginszt |
author_sort |
Katarzyna Ginszt |
title |
Status of Robots in Moral and Legal Systems |
title_short |
Status of Robots in Moral and Legal Systems |
title_full |
Status of Robots in Moral and Legal Systems |
title_fullStr |
Status of Robots in Moral and Legal Systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Status of Robots in Moral and Legal Systems |
title_sort |
status of robots in moral and legal systems |
publisher |
Adam Mickiewicz University |
series |
Ethics in Progress |
issn |
2084-9257 |
publishDate |
2019-10-01 |
description |
David J. Gunkel in his latest book Robot Rights presents the opportunities and challenges of integrating robots into moral and legal systems. The research question asked by the author is “Can and should robots have rights”? Following the Humean distinction between “is” and “ought”, Gunkel creates four statements that either opt for or against incorporating robots into legal discourse. The four modalities group contrasting opinions developed by different scholars on the subject of the eponymous robot rights. The author provides readers with yet another alternative approach to the question of legal recognition of robots which is based on Levinasian philosophy.
|
topic |
robot rights technological development AI moral system legal system roboethics |
url |
http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/eip/article/view/19970 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT katarzynaginszt statusofrobotsinmoralandlegalsystems |
_version_ |
1724582066069176320 |