P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity

Our study aims to contrast the neural temporal features of early stage of decision making in the context of risk and ambiguity. In monetary gambles under ambiguous or risky conditions, 12 participants were asked to make a decision to bet or not, with the event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded mean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lei Wang, Jiehui Zheng, Shenwei Huang, Haoye Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/108417
id doaj-f6b5a444f7bc4015bcaa9992f4fe71a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-f6b5a444f7bc4015bcaa9992f4fe71a12020-11-24T22:18:53ZengHindawi LimitedComputational Intelligence and Neuroscience1687-52651687-52732015-01-01201510.1155/2015/108417108417P300 and Decision Making under Risk and AmbiguityLei Wang0Jiehui Zheng1Shenwei Huang2Haoye Sun3Department of Management Science and Engineering, School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaDepartment of Management Science and Engineering, School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaOur study aims to contrast the neural temporal features of early stage of decision making in the context of risk and ambiguity. In monetary gambles under ambiguous or risky conditions, 12 participants were asked to make a decision to bet or not, with the event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded meantime. The proportion of choosing to bet in ambiguous condition was significantly lower than that in risky condition. An ERP component identified as P300 was found. The P300 amplitude elicited in risky condition was significantly larger than that in ambiguous condition. The lower bet rate in ambiguous condition and the smaller P300 amplitude elicited by ambiguous stimuli revealed that people showed much more aversion in the ambiguous condition than in the risky condition. The ERP results may suggest that decision making under ambiguity occupies higher working memory and recalls more past experience while decision making under risk mainly mobilizes attentional resources to calculate current information. These findings extended the current understanding of underlying mechanism for early assessment stage of decision making and explored the difference between the decision making under risk and ambiguity.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/108417
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lei Wang
Jiehui Zheng
Shenwei Huang
Haoye Sun
spellingShingle Lei Wang
Jiehui Zheng
Shenwei Huang
Haoye Sun
P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity
Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
author_facet Lei Wang
Jiehui Zheng
Shenwei Huang
Haoye Sun
author_sort Lei Wang
title P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity
title_short P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity
title_full P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity
title_fullStr P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity
title_full_unstemmed P300 and Decision Making under Risk and Ambiguity
title_sort p300 and decision making under risk and ambiguity
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience
issn 1687-5265
1687-5273
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Our study aims to contrast the neural temporal features of early stage of decision making in the context of risk and ambiguity. In monetary gambles under ambiguous or risky conditions, 12 participants were asked to make a decision to bet or not, with the event-related potentials (ERPs) recorded meantime. The proportion of choosing to bet in ambiguous condition was significantly lower than that in risky condition. An ERP component identified as P300 was found. The P300 amplitude elicited in risky condition was significantly larger than that in ambiguous condition. The lower bet rate in ambiguous condition and the smaller P300 amplitude elicited by ambiguous stimuli revealed that people showed much more aversion in the ambiguous condition than in the risky condition. The ERP results may suggest that decision making under ambiguity occupies higher working memory and recalls more past experience while decision making under risk mainly mobilizes attentional resources to calculate current information. These findings extended the current understanding of underlying mechanism for early assessment stage of decision making and explored the difference between the decision making under risk and ambiguity.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/108417
work_keys_str_mv AT leiwang p300anddecisionmakingunderriskandambiguity
AT jiehuizheng p300anddecisionmakingunderriskandambiguity
AT shenweihuang p300anddecisionmakingunderriskandambiguity
AT haoyesun p300anddecisionmakingunderriskandambiguity
_version_ 1725781006468775936