The Costs of Environmental Regulation in a Concentrated Industry

The typical cost analysis of an environmental regulation consists of an engineering estimate of the compliance costs. In industries where fixed costs are an important determinant of market structure, this static analysis ignores the dynamic effects of the regulation on entry, investment, and market...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ryan, Stephen (Contributor)
Other Authors: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics (Contributor)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2012-10-04T16:11:34Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01606 am a22001813u 4500
001 73601
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ryan, Stephen  |e author 
100 1 0 |a Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Ryan, Stephen  |e contributor 
100 1 0 |a Ryan, Stephen  |e contributor 
245 0 0 |a The Costs of Environmental Regulation in a Concentrated Industry 
260 |b John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,   |c 2012-10-04T16:11:34Z. 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73601 
520 |a The typical cost analysis of an environmental regulation consists of an engineering estimate of the compliance costs. In industries where fixed costs are an important determinant of market structure, this static analysis ignores the dynamic effects of the regulation on entry, investment, and market power. I evaluate the welfare costs of the 1990 Amendments to the Clean Air Act on the U.S. Portland cement industry, accounting for these effects through a dynamic model of oligopoly in the tradition of Ericson and Pakes (1995). Using the two-step estimator of Bajari, Benkard, and Levin (2007), I recover the entire cost structure of the industry, including the distributions of sunk entry costs and capacity adjustment costs. My primary finding is that the Amendments have significantly increased the sunk cost of entry, leading to a loss of between $810M and $3.2B in product market surplus. A static analysis misses the welfare penalty on consumers, and obtains the wrong sign of the welfare effects on incumbent firms. 
546 |a en_US 
655 7 |a Article 
773 |t Econometrica