Exploring variation in the use of feedback from national clinical audits: a realist investigation
yes === Background National Clinical Audits (NCAs) are a well-established quality improvement strategy used in healthcare settings. Significant resources, including clinicians’ time, are invested in participating in NCAs, yet there is variation in the extent to which the resulting feedback stimula...
Main Authors: | Alvarado, Natasha, McVey, Lynn, Greenhalgh, J., Dowding, D., Mamas, M., Gale, C., Doherty, P., Randell, Rebecca |
---|---|
Language: | en |
Published: |
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10454/18002 |
Similar Items
-
Exploring variation in the use of feedback from national clinical audits: a realist investigation
by: Natasha Alvarado, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Institutional use of National Clinical Audits by healthcare providers
by: McVey, Lynn, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Clinical performance comparators in audit and feedback: a review of theory and evidence
by: Wouter T. Gude, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
How, in what contexts, and why do quality dashboards lead to improvements in care quality in acute hospitals? Protocol for a realist feasibility evaluation
by: Randell, Rebecca, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Hidden labour: the skilful work of clinical audit data collection and its implications for secondary use of data via integrated health IT
by: Lynn McVey, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)